Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I don't see the point in subsidies. I'd gut them all. EV's are here. Govt subsidies at this point only serve to protect weak OEMs that need to fail. At this point many OEMs have to fail in some manner. Either through mergers, bankruptcy, etc. They need to fail.
Só long as fossil fuels are subsidized so should be BEV. Better none at all, but good luck eliminating depletion allowances, for example
 
Só long as fossil fuels are subsidized so should be BEV. Better none at all, but good luck eliminating depletion allowances, for example
You are conflating ICE/EV decisions with fossil fuel/renewables. The benefit to the average ICE owner (of fossil fuel subsidies) is marginal, the normal swings and falls and rises of oil pricing overshadow all the fossil fuel subsidies (which should go- I agree) they have impacts and are a subsidy to EV owners as well (as long as natural gas and oil provides grid power). The benefit to GM or Toyota of a $10k tax credit is huge, literally moves the argument - thus the bolt/volt series from GM. EV transition is going to require that many OEMs disappear, it's going to be a very difficult political and social transition, thus eliminating subsidies for EVs will at this time ensure that the OEM is committed to success no blindly relying on govt subsidies. It is time to let capitalism weed out the weak from the best producers.

For the same reason I feel that subsidies for renewable generation have some merit.
 
In all the discussion of the possible share price consequences from a investment grade rating all the comments seem to be oriented to mutual funds, mostly indexed ones. The two largest instructional investor classes have never been mentioned AFAIK.

The largest single investor class in public equities is pension funds
The second one is insurance companies
Third comes mutual funds
Various classes of trust companies, banks, etc also are represented in part by the first three, but also are massive investors on their own.
Hedge funds and investment managers sometimes are distinct categories.
Then there is Black Rock, little known but the World’s largest investment manager with >10 trillion dollars managed)


until nowI have referred to Institutional investors, not realizing many of us do not understand. these categories. Many of them adopt a ‘prudent investor’ rule by law or choice that limits investments below ‘investment grade’ by rating agencies.

In TSLA, the interest savings from investment grade is ‘de minimus’ because Tesla has little debt. The real consequence would be to massively open the worldwide institutional investor community to TSLA. If share price rise, lowered volatility and reduced influence of speculators are goals, the higher rating is important.

Probably the quickest way to get to a higher rating is to issue new debt that would, coincidentally, have Tesla pay rating agencies. The APPL approach has worked well, using long and medium term borrowing to reduce FX volatility. Tesla needs that now that Shanghai and Berlin are beginning and both sales and supplies are becoming important sources of FX volatility.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I also noted the lack of loading docks.

One thing to consider is the economics, both Tesla and SpaceX need at lot of specialised cold-rolled Stainless Steel, even with a bulk supply contact, that might be expensive, especially if a highly-specialised formula, or process is needed.

Cybertruck needs to hit the production cost target price, and there is a lot of Stainless Steel in each body.

Hypothetically what might be needed are electric-arc furnaces, some sort of mixing facility, then the facility to do the cold-rolling. Perhaps the denial from SDI may have been cleverly worded, they seem to deny Stainless Steel shipments, but didn't necessarily rule out supplying Tesla with steel or other metals.

I'm speculating on a long shot here, it isn't that likely, but one way or another, Tesla needs to get a lot of Stainless Steel at a good price.
(out of interest, is it CRNGO or CRGO ?)

SDI said they would have 3 million tons/yr capacity.

Just for illustrative purposes, say Tesla Austin makes 500k Cybertrucks/yr and each consumes 500kg, that is 250,000 tonnes/yr of stainless.

Yes Starship will use a noticeable quantity, but not that much !

So SDI aren't exactly betting the farm on Tesla, important though Tesla may be.

 
(out of interest, is it CRNGO or CRGO ?)

SDI said they would have 3 million tons/yr capacity.

Just for illustrative purposes, say Tesla Austin makes 500k Cybertrucks/yr and each consumes 500kg, that is 250,000 tonnes/yr of stainless.

Yes Starship will use a noticeable quantity, but not that much !

So SDI aren't exactly betting the farm on Tesla, important though Tesla may be.

See yesterday’s Tesla Daily podcast on Youtube. SDI has publicly stated they have nothing to do with Tesla.
 
You are conflating ICE/EV decisions with fossil fuel/renewables. The benefit to the average ICE owner (of fossil fuel subsidies) is marginal, the normal swings and falls and rises of oil pricing overshadow all the fossil fuel subsidies (which should go- I agree) they have impacts and are a subsidy to EV owners as well (as long as natural gas and oil provides grid power). The benefit to GM or Toyota of a $10k tax credit is huge, literally moves the argument - thus the bolt/volt series from GM. EV transition is going to require that many OEMs disappear, it's going to be a very difficult political and social transition, thus eliminating subsidies for EVs will at this time ensure that the OEM is committed to success no blindly relying on govt subsidies. It is time to let capitalism weed out the weak from the best producers.

For the same reason I feel that subsidies for renewable generation have some merit.
1. No I am not. I did say "for example" because the structure of direct subsidies, tax benefits, and so on for all fossil fuels is hugely complex and opaque. What is the actual cost of protecting the Arabian peninsula fossil fuel sources? What is the cost fo protecting Russian gas supplies to Western Europe?

For renewables we can quite easily quantify all those factors because the adoption and advances have been happening primarily in the least two decades.

2. Yes, I do conflate them because energy source and energy use are inextricably intertwined. They can be arbitrarily separated for some purposes. One major example of inevitable confusion is financing of construction and maintenance for roads and other vehicular services. In many places around the world that has been done by allocation of motor fuel taxes. Should BEV have a free ride?

So I do admit that I can give both answers truthfully depending on the level of vision. Almost all of us, including me, are prone to oversimplify the issues.

Thus, we need to watch Norway closely. They are first significant economy in the world to face all those issues today. Even for them, mass adoption has been the easy part. Now watch all those gasoline taxes diminish. What next? There is no easy answer.
 
I would wager you are correct. It makes no sense for Tesla to roll the steel themselves, the vendor should do that. It also would be VERY difficult to flatten the this particular SS after it had been coiled. So, yes - I agree, likely the SS for the body panels will come as precut blanks/sheets of appropriate sizes.
Do you have a strong idea how they'll source the "precut blanks/sheets" and how easy/cheap transporting them might be?

I have a single reference point from thirty years ago when buying blanks and shipping across oceans was cheaper and easier than rolls. IIRC the avoidance of processing rolls was essential because shipping and handling rolls was difficult enough, but have the capacity to prove finished products was overwhelming expensive. At that time producing blanks at production site was 'relatively easy' in comparison.

Have we an idea how SpaceX handles that issue? Obviously that is tiny volume compared with Cybertruck.

These questions probably demand another thread, They seem to me to be central to the economics of Cybertruck construction. This, unless they have some major technological breakthrough, this seems rather a giant leap, does it not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Samsung Electro-Mechanics is expected to win more orders this year than before as Tesla is expected to procure camera modules from more suppliers to cut unit prices, the source said.

The US EV maker is expected to ship up to 2 million units of EVs this year, they said.
 
You're missing one important piece: NFLX is guiding for only 10M new subs for 2022. That's a YOY growth of only 4%. I believe this is what's tanking the stock. Nobody wants a 40 PE stock that only guides for 4% growth.

Yep.
And the rate of growth continues to slow as well.

NFLX is at the top of its S curve while TSLA is at the bottom.

As I’ve said earlier this week I think macros are going to drag the market as a whole down medium term and maybe TSLA with it. Get powder ready if you can.
 
Last edited:
TSLA just traded below 983 USD = 866 EUR in Berlin.
Tradegate_2022-01-21 14-32-30.png

Anybody waiting for 2 * 420 = 840 EUR (953 USD) today?
 
Hard to imagine that the FED is hawkish next week. I'm hoping they tell everyone to chill out and we get a relief rally.


The problem is that wage growth is now well below inflation, and the economy is inevitably going to stall if the purchasing power of its workers is declining. Stagflation.

The fed printed too much money, and lockdowns made the supply/inflation problem even worse. Now the fed is looking at a large market drop or stagflation.
 
The problem is that wage growth is now well below inflation, and the economy is inevitably going to stall if the purchasing power of its workers is declining. Stagflation.
Which is confusing because labor is in huge demand. The FED is in a tough spot, and for some reason (gee I wonder) our government is relying on monetary policy to fix everything. I still believe that most of our price increases are due to lack of supply but it's going to be bumpy either way.
 
I'm not sure using the internet to ask people who don't have internet if they need internet is "at his best"

I love Elon, but there's actually memes about people doing this very thing.
Yeah yeah, but Tonga has already replied.
I propose using ships with dual ground stations to bounce the connection to the nearest backbone.
Edit: because the laser link sat to sat system is not fully functional/ high enough density .

 
Last edited: