TN Mtn Man
Member
Elon Musk=John GaltPlease don't deify Elon. He is not god.
God v2? Maybe ...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Elon Musk=John GaltPlease don't deify Elon. He is not god.
God v2? Maybe ...
I do worry about these things. As the transition starts to significantly impact petro-profits, what will the reaction be? So far, (we speculate) it has consisted of rather covert media and stock market manipulation -FUD and damage to company and personnel reputations.You really don't even need the movie. Big oil did the following, quite blatantly and obviously:
1. - Deposed democratically elected Mohammed Mossadegh, Premier of Iran because he had the audacity to nationalize The British oil holdings.
As this shows Kermit Roosevelt led the final solution. FWIW Kermit Was later an emissary to some Gulf States from The Chase Manhattan Bank.64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup
New documents reveal how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate…foreignpolicy.com
David Rockefeller, Chairman of Chase at the time wandered the Gulf States.
The young Shah became deeply connected with the Rockefeller family and US oil interests.64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup
New documents reveal how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate…foreignpolicy.com
2.- while the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia officially is dated from 1932, the discovery of oil by Chevron which established a joint venture called Aramco. From that day forward deep involvement in Saudi political affairs was driven by Aramco. Much of that has been rewritten for public consumption.
The list goes on.
Any modestly inquisitive person during the 1960's and 1970's who also lived in the Gulf, Iran or the levant anywhere has tons of personal stories about those events.
Not much of the reality has ever been publicly reported except in fictionalized versions.
FWIW, the very creation of Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria were all post World Wa II spoils distribution. That included putting a foreigner with no connection to what was named Iraq, another one in what became Jordan. At the time the connection to the massively expanding oilfields were driving forces.
As we consider the resistance to Tesla just think that these forces stop at nothing to maintain the status quo, even selling 'clean' hydrogen extracted from natural gas. There is much more powerful opposition to clean energy than we really can imagine.
my apologies. I really try to avoid these discussions. They are, however front and center behind Tesla opposition.
The fundamental value of TSLA to your average large fund was always much lower [than $1,200]
This may be old, and not that relevant to the stock price, but it will amuse The Terminator worriers. When I taught Biology I did the normal "What is Life?" lecture. Reproduce and Repair itself were two of the requirements.It just dawned on me…bots making bots is the ultimate “machine that builds the machine”. Mind blown.
He's not John Galt and he's not Tony Stark, and political commentary doesn't belong in this thread.Elon Musk=John Galt
...This is the closest thing to the "shortzies/bear raid" nonsense I think actually exists.
Post's like this are why I vacillate between unbridled optimism....and looming despair.You really don't even need the movie. Big oil did the following, quite blatantly and obviously:
1. - Deposed democratically elected Mohammed Mossadegh, Premier of Iran because he had the audacity to nationalize The British oil holdings.
As this shows Kermit Roosevelt led the final solution. FWIW Kermit Was later an emissary to some Gulf States from The Chase Manhattan Bank.64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup
New documents reveal how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate…foreignpolicy.com
David Rockefeller, Chairman of Chase at the time wandered the Gulf States.
The young Shah became deeply connected with the Rockefeller family and US oil interests.64 Years Later, CIA Finally Releases Details of Iranian Coup
New documents reveal how the CIA attempted to call off the failing coup — only to be salvaged at the last minute by an insubordinate…foreignpolicy.com
2.- while the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia officially is dated from 1932, the discovery of oil by Chevron which established a joint venture called Aramco. From that day forward deep involvement in Saudi political affairs was driven by Aramco. Much of that has been rewritten for public consumption.
The list goes on.
Any modestly inquisitive person during the 1960's and 1970's who also lived in the Gulf, Iran or the levant anywhere has tons of personal stories about those events.
Not much of the reality has ever been publicly reported except in fictionalized versions.
FWIW, the very creation of Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, and Syria were all post World Wa II spoils distribution. That included putting a foreigner with no connection to what was named Iraq, another one in what became Jordan. At the time the connection to the massively expanding oilfields were driving forces.
As we consider the resistance to Tesla just think that these forces stop at nothing to maintain the status quo, even selling 'clean' hydrogen extracted from natural gas. There is much more powerful opposition to clean energy than we really can imagine.
my apologies. I really try to avoid these discussions. They are, however front and center behind Tesla opposition.
Humans literally exist to be a test dummy for a "new" computer code to see if it can survive under current situations and conditions. And to create "new code" for the next experiment. PERIOD.That is exactly the question. The real costs are more though, to Amazon that robot replaces a worker with a 10% absentee rate, a high rate of workers injury claim, and probably $22/hour so a real costs of $35 an hour probably. Of course Robots break down and have issues. Lots of people ignore those challenges and sometimes the uptime is far less with robots than good employees. Then you need scale, you want repetitive activity that can be trained but over time the NNs might make the robot more competitive.
Amazon has spent billions automating factories, they continue to look. They just haven't, to date, had someone in a silly suit dancing on stage.
I think having a robot bot would be great for many menial task and for helping monitor elderly and assist elderly with household chores, etc. I don't see a bot as necessarily a great replacement for many tasks. Tactile issues, which are a big deal, are dismissed by many posters that don't understand how hard that is. In this regard, Tesla/EM statements on FSD are coming back to the fore. It's always been next year. Well as far as I know noone has really solved the critical tactile challenges with humanoid robots. It doesn't matter what the NN can instruct if the mechanical bot can't perform. Humanoid bodies are amazing, it's going to be much harder to replace than some here believe.
Or they know something about robotics and understand that nobody has solved the fundamental problem of replicating humanoid robots and that is the human hand. The entire market is down and has most techs have been getting crushed for a while. So when the CEO sort of ignores the glowing success of the last year and starts ...again...talking about FSD (where Tesla has failed to deliver) and then further doubles down on another unproven revenue source (bots) that might cause some to take some profits as well. In particular when the plans for 2025-2030 are much less clear today than they might have hoped.So enquiring (and gambling) minds wanna know: What will TSLA do next week?
The answer may depend on what caused last week's stock behavior. I've seen two competing explanations for the price plunge after earnings:
1) According to Gary Black and others, institutional portfolio managers are short-term thinkers who need hard numbers to plug into their spreadsheets. All of Elon's talk about FSD and Optimus scared them, because they can't assign a valuation to those pie-in-the-sky future products. They want to see Tesla focused on auto production.
2) According to @Artful Dodger and others, the stock plunge was a pre-planned bear raid by stock manipulators to profit from naive call buyers. Everyone knew the ER would beat estimates, and the manipulators knew naive investors had bet on the stock going up. So they crashed the price and profited from shorting and expiration of the calls they had sold.
So who is right? Or is it both? I lean toward #2 for the following reasons:
Managers of big money may be short-term focused and ignorant about engineering, but I doubt they are dumb. They have seen the track record of Elon's companies in delivering innovative products and services, from the best cars in the world to rockets that land on barges. They know that Tesla's demand is off the charts, and new products are not needed soon for Tesla's growth, and they heard Zach and Elon say the growth will be "comfortably" over 50 percent per year. Only a fool would bet against Elon's juggernaut now. I doubt they are all fools.
And maybe the portfolio managers knew a bear raid was coming, or helped it, and held off from buying because they expected to get in lower after the bear raid.
So how do we determine which explanation is correct? If #2 is correct, I'd expect the PMs to wait until they think the raid is over, playing chicken with each other, then start buying with a vengeance, shooting up the stock price. And I would expect the same pattern to occur after every ER this year, since each one is likely to beat published street estimates.
I won't get fooled again.
I refer you to the currently unfolding case of Daimler. Now rebranding purely to Mercedes-Benz, going “fully electric”, and a CEO who just talks about increasing their multiple (who cares about execution right Mary?). All after carving out their profitable truck business.This has been mentioned by other members but maybe worth pointing out again. If the EV business gains traction at OEMs and they get to a point where the ICE business is creating a drag on their business, the OEMs might spin-out the EV business as a separate company.
Let's say Ford stock is at $20/share. After a spin-out, a shareholder would be holding FORD at say $10/share and Fordev at say $10/share.
Today, cash flow from legacy sales will fund EVs but later after a spin-off, the EV business may be able to go to the capital markets for cash injections.
FORD may run down to $0/share while FORDev could run up to $100/share.
Back in my CPA years, I had an audit client that did just this. The client was a conglomerate in 7 different industries. They took their 4 losing divisions and carved them out into a separate company, leaving their 3 winners in the current company.
$1,201 discounted back 12 months at your chosen discount rate (likely 11-12% right now). So about $1,070.so the fact that more than a dozen of price targets of WS analysts average out at $1,201 or so is indicative of ...?
He's not John Galt and he's not Tony Stark, and political commentary doesn't belong in this thread.
And Ayn Rand died drunk and alone, on Social Security.
Or they know something about robotics and understand that nobody has solved the fundamental problem of replicating humanoid robots and that is the human hand. The entire market is down and has most techs have been getting crushed for a while. So when the CEO sort of ignores the glowing success of the last year and starts ...again...talking about FSD (where Tesla has failed to deliver) and then further doubles down on another unproven revenue source (bots) that might cause some to take some profits as well. In particular when the plans for 2025-2030 are much less clear today than they might have hoped.
So many posts on the investor forum about bots and how great they will be. NOBODY has solved the problem of replicating the hand. Self healing, replicating tactile surface is proving very very hard to replicate. Not MIT, not Boston Dynamics, not any one of dozens of leading edge Korea robotic companies. The NN is neat, super. Those are done in labs already. Replicating that mechanically is a challenge. Not to dump ice water on people's dreams but c'mon. Look at FSD where Tesla was hardly in a leadership position, discounted the difficulty, and has still failed to provide a solution that would get close to L4 capability. That's still some time away. That's with something that is technically challenging but within Teslas wheelhouse (cars). Boston Dynamics has been working trying to figure out the hand for a while and ..nada. My last statement on this: Tesla has no special competency or differentiator when it comes to robotics. None. Why someone would think it is going to drive huge revenue is beyond me. Teslas track record on solving hard to solve issues is sort of spotty. Octovalve was the biggest success so far. Maybe someone in Tesla will one day figure out skin. Who knows?
Indeed.Over and over people imagine that there is no need for smaller cars than Model 3 and/or Elon has said there will not be any such vehicle and/or small means cheap and low margin. If my memory is correct every single opinion along these liens comes from somebody in North America.
Major auto markets such as India, Brazil, all of Europe and Africa plus almost all of Asia has strong preference for smaller vehicles, whether cheap or expensive.ts a
..... Bluntly, Tesla can easily quadruple sales without hampering margins once there are smaller models available using Tesla design and construction technologies.
In this post I am not repeating any of the data that has already been posted periodically by several of us. I will offer some obvious hints:
.....
Note 1: I apologize if my tone seems strident. It becomes a bit tiresome to keep seeing the same reasoning over and over.
Note 2: These comments are in part driven my my habit of buying 'hot hatches' over the years, invariably with ASP of roughly twice the base model.
I live in Italy so I absolutely understand your concerns.Indeed.
Here is a typical street in a European town. It is my street in my town, and the fact that it is in Europe would probably surprise 52% of voters, but that's not my concern. Inhabitants range from pensioners to surgeons, via electricians, engineers, teachers, drug-addicts, chemists. About half are house-owners, half renting. The average house price in this street is precisely the same as the national average. In short this is an utterly average town street. Go into a European (or Asian) large city and it gets a lot more congested.
This is mid-day, mid-week, mid-winter. The street doesn't get any emptier than this all year. All the 3-4 bed terraced houses on the right have a 5m frontage and rely entirely on street parking. Many are 2-car households but the average is probably 1.5 cars/house as some houses have no cars. The houses on the left are 5-7 bed and have off-street parking for ~4 cars each. The streets in this area are absolutely at capacity for parking.
I've drawn a 5m frontage on the wall. The Skoda Roomster with the hidden number plate (not mine) is 4.2m long. A VW Golf mk IV is 4.2m long. A Peugot 107 is 3.4m long. A Tesla 3 is 4.7m long, and a Tesla Y is also 4.7m long. So too is my VW Passat 4.7m long and it is very much more difficult for me to find a parking space in the evening than when I drove a Golf - the extra 0.5m makes for an enormous reduction in the number of available parking space options.
The first Tesla was purchased in this street last month. The owner sold a 3-year old Audi SUV for more than they paid for it, and bought a Tesla model 3. Their commute used to cost them £15 (USD 20) in fuel, now it costs them £1.50. They are fortunate as they own one of the houses with off-street parking and own their garden so can run a cable to their charger - very few people in this street can do this (most either rent their homes and/or are on-street parkers). Doubly fortunate as the nearest Tesla Supercharger is 60-miles away (120-mile round-trip).
Nobody in this street has a 'truck'. The full-size vans are those of visiting trades working on jobs. It would probably be socially unacceptable to try to park a truck (or a full size van) here routinely overnight unless one had a real good reason. The trades who live in the street only park small vans here overnight (4.5m length) though the issue is not just the length but also the width. (Cybertruck is 5.9m long x 2.0m wide.) Trying to get home for supper is no fun if the only parking space is 3m long and you are in a 6m vehicle.
>> Tesla will do a car that is smaller than a 3/Y, if only because their own employees will demand it in Europe/Asia as otherwise they can't park.
>>Tesla will need to massively expand the Supercharger network, if only because their own employees will demand it in Europe/Asia as otherwise they can't charge.
View attachment 762187
So many posts on the investor forum about bots and how great they will be. NOBODY has solved the problem of replicating the hand. Self healing, replicating tactile surface is proving very very hard to replicate. Not MIT, not Boston Dynamics, not any one of dozens of leading edge Korea robotic companies. The NN is neat, super.
LOL, but character assassination does? And what bearing does John Galt have to do with this threadthose things have on the John Galt discussion?
Elon liked this tweet from @avoigt about 45 minutes ago:
As an aside, my stupid meme from Friday went viral on Twitter over the weekend, and was liked by none other than Maye Musk herself!