Oh brother. I'll let you ponder why it is you're absolutely wrong about the seals but I'll spend this and only this post on cryptos.Your baby seal analogy does not work. Disposing of the baby seal skins will use energy but it will not kill more seals. Selling bitcoin triggers transactional processes that consume as much, or more energy, as purchasing those bitcoins. The most environmentally safe thing Tesla can do is hold those Bitcoin without generating any new transactions until the transaction process is greatly improved or running on renewal energy.
This company and its charismatic, iconoclastic leader are unimaginably powerful influencers. As they do, so do hundreds of thousands or millions of others. The sole environmentally responsible course of action is to perform a complete 180º turn on their crypto policy or stance. Half measures - such as holding - don't do it. It was a wrong act to begin with, and completely against stated goals; cutting the cord now - even at the cost of a short-term increase in energy consumption - is the only way out.
On edit: there is a reason there is not any green typeface in the above post. That means that anyone who has a differing view on the matter is encouraged to present his or her thoughts, arguments or counterarguments. This is called "discourse" - and it is why this thread and this forum exists.
Emplacing a thumbs down icon isn't discourse. Laziness never is becoming.
Last edited: