You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All tech stocks being lifted by NFLX and ADBE. Bodes well for TSLA.....big if of courseWhat's with the AH stock price on TSLA? Up $4 and change.
It's a reasonable concern to have if you're not familiar with China. Am I saying it's impossible? No. I just think it's very unlikely.
I do not think i have been this excited for an earnings call in a while...okay, i lied, i am always excited for earnings calls. Good luck to us all!
LOL.Plus, it wouldn't work. What is being suggested is illegal blackmail and Elon would have no other choice but to tell the blackmailers that he has a legal obligation to his Twitter shareholders and can't take Tesla into consideration. The Chinese government knows and understands this and wouldn't even try because it would discredit them badly.
Of all the things to worry about this one seems awfully unrealistic and contrived.
Doing this to Elon would be equivalent to doing this to the USA. They don't have that leverage and Musk would be required to immediately report this to the government because of, at minimum, his security clearance.LOL.
China does this with entire COUNTRIES.
I have no doubt they wouldn’t hesitate to do it to one individual who put himself in such a position that he happened to own both one of the worlds largest social media platforms AND also had a large holding with a different company that has a substantial manufacturing base in China.
Wait, something doesn't seem right. Are we sure those are Tesla Semis? Because if you expand the view of the posted Google Maps link, and look at nearby Giga Nevada's roof, it has hardly any solar panels. If I'm right, it suggests this is an old photo and those are standard ICE trucks. I'd love this to be true, but doubt it now.24 Tesla Semis Spotted at Giga Nevada, Possibly Preparing for First Deliveries
The first deliveries of the Tesla Semi are approaching and will take place in early December. 24 Semis were spotted at Giga Nevada, possibly in preparation for deliveries to customers.www.tesmanian.com
View attachment 865202
I think he's talking about the US doing it to Elon, not China...Doing this to Elon would be equivalent to doing this to the USA. They don't have that leverage and Musk would be required to immediately report this to the government because of, at minimum, his security clearance.
Pressuring current Twitter execs/employees, and paying them to do their bidding, would be easier than bending Musk's arm. It's pretty easy to come up with a reason for suspension, if you try hard enough. If you mean to think China would have the power to go so far as to try to get Musk to ban, say, a US govt official...you should just stop having opinions on this topic at all. I'm not trying you be rude, and I know you didn't say that.
The "LOL" does not help your case. It makes me more convinced you're thinking emotionally and are way out of your domain of expertise. Pressuring small, weak, corrupt countries is not at all on the same scale of what you're suggesting.
Interesting... sure looks like the old view from Google Maps. Oh Eva...Wait, something doesn't seem right. Are we sure those are Tesla Semis? Because if you expand the view of the posted link, and look at Giga Nevada's roof, it has hardly any solar panels. If I'm right, it suggests this is an old photo and those are standard ICE trucks. I'd love this to be true, but doubt it now.
View attachment 865211
Giga Nevada last September (from video in a Teslerati article):
View attachment 865210
So….did you feint left and go to NYC, or feint right and head to Connecticut? Sly move, whichever one is rightYes - I gave my chart to someone on Twitter who posted it.
btw - I am now on Twitter trying to fight the good fight. My account is CPAinNYC
If so, then maybe I'm having a stroke right now. Because it seemed pretty clear that he was talking about China gaining leverage over Elon.I think he's talking about the US doing it to Elon, not China...
He referenced US politicians in his second sentence and the post doesn't make sense if it's not the US. China can't punish a US company in the US, but the US certainly can.If so, then maybe I'm having a stroke right now. Because it seemed pretty clear that he was talking about China gaining leverage over Elon.
Happy to continue this in a more appropriate thread, if there is one.
I dont know what you are referring to as small, weak, corrupt countries - china exerts massive influence over all its trading partners. Even the USA doesn‘t fully recognize Taiwan as an independent country. Every country bows to China for access to its markets,, to different degrees. Any company operating their also do.Doing this to Elon would be equivalent to doing this to the USA. They don't have that leverage and Musk would be required to immediately report this to the government because of, at minimum, his security clearance.
Pressuring current Twitter execs/employees, and paying them to do their bidding, would be easier than bending Musk's arm. It's pretty easy to come up with a reason for suspension, if you try hard enough. If you mean to think China would have the power to go so far as to try to get Musk to ban, say, a US govt official...you should just stop having opinions on this topic at all. I'm not trying you be rude, and I know you didn't say that.
The "LOL" does not help your case. It makes me more convinced you're thinking emotionally and are way out of your domain of expertise. Pressuring small, weak, corrupt countries is not at all on the same scale of what you're suggesting.
He referenced US politicians in his second sentence and the post doesn't make sense if it's not the US. China can't punish a US company in the US, but the US certainly can.
Wait, something doesn't seem right
I dont know what you are referring to as small, weak, corrupt countries - china exerts massive influence over all its trading partners. Even the USA doesn‘t fully recognize Taiwan as an independent country. Every country bows to China for access to its markets,, to different degrees. Any company operating their also do.
For example, there is a reason you never see Disney or Apple leadership criticize Beijing/China policies.
I will agree to disagree with anyone who doesn’t see this as an obvious pain point if Elon does in fact take ownership of Twitter.
I fully understand what you're arguing and respectfully disagree as someone who has worked in topics very pertinent to this in particular. Elon does not criticize BJ/China. That does not mean he's beholden to them now or will be if he acquires Twitter. And it seems like you're lacking some critical points on US law and geopolitics re: all of this.To clear up any confusion:
I think the following is the risk:
1. China asks Elon/Twitter to moderate posts/users in a certain way on a particular topic on twitters global platform.
2. Elon refuses (Just as Twitter would today).
3. In response, China make things “difficult“ for tesla operations in China In whatever way they wish.
Twitter today would not do anything that the China government asked. China has zero leverage over twitter.
That all changes the moment twitter is owned by Elon. At that point China has a very big stick to hit Elon with.
I think Musk already answered this. Free speech to the extend as it allows it by LAW. So free speech is illegal in China, Elon will respect that.I am curious about how Elon is going to deal with his Twitter free speech ambitions and the Chinese government, which has a huge stick to wield over Tesla if it wants.
If it becomes a choice between Chinese government “requests” to moderate something on Twitter Vs. Facing disruptions to GigaShanghai, which does Elon hold most dear: Free Speech on Twitter or Tesla operations in China?
In my opinion that is the single biggest new risk Elons ownership of Twitter brings to Tesla (And a good reason for him to get rid of it as soon as practical, be it as a merger or re-float)