Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I want to preface my remarks that for what it's worth, I voted yes. But if the nos have it and Elon leaves, I won't cry. It was one thing when he was advocating for electric vehicles and Mars, but after COVID hit, his true libertarian side began to show. I don't blame him for being anti-government. Most corporate leaders are also. But his use of X as a personal hype machine overemphasizes his views on a multitude of hot button topics. My guess is that the next Tesla CEO will be more like other CEOs. The most visible of the lot are people like Buffett and Dimon and they rarely pontificate at the levels that Elon Musk does. What Tesla needs is a quiet, sensible leader, not a loose cannon.
the day Elon leaves will be the day TSLA reclaims its leadership... among the meme stocks. It will drop so hard Kathy Wood will be bigger than Roaring Kitty.
 
Here's a video from the Electric Viking who says CATL has a new very high power density cell. Tesla is set to partner with CATL. Does this board have insight into whether these numbers are real and if Tesla will benefit from the tech? We seem to have never gotten the full benefit of the Battery day presentation. Where does this leave us?
Thank you @Thumper for mentioning this Video. In the video there is a mix up from W/kg instead of Wh/kg. Therefore I tried to find other sources for my (super fast) analysis. Actually I didn‘t watch the video but used AI to summarize it, just to be transparent. He showes the picture of an airplane in his video which lowers the credibility of this source for me - but thats just my style, trying to be objective. The Electric Viking is helpful and I liked former videos from him very much.

The Electric Viking seems to relate to the Shenxing PLUS Battery, announced in this press release on April 24th, 2024:

CATL Unveils Shenxing PLUS, Enabling 1,000-km Range and 4C Superfast Charging​


The old generation was Shenxing and was announced on August 16th, 2023:

CATL Launches Superfast Charging Battery Shenxing, Opens Up Era of EV Superfast Charging​


From my web-research Shengxing is currently used in a variant of the Zeekr 001 from Geely (major chinese car manufacturer). A recent news article from April 2nd, 2024 claims a charging time from 10 % to 80 % in 11 min 28s for this car with a 95 kWh battery:

The range of this version seems to be about 650 km, i think its WLTP. The Model 3 LR AWD in the Teslas English Hongkong Webshop claims 629 km WLTP, with a much smaller battery of about 78 kWh from my memory.

The car from Geely car is probably available today in China for about 37‘500 - 40‘000 USD.

CATL‘s new generation Shenxing PLUS claims a 7 % improvement in packing density. From this I would expect a car with fast charging capability within less than 1 year from today available to buy from a major chinese car manufacturer in major markets excluding the US with a WLTP range of almost 700 km (WLTP is always optimistic) for less than 40‘000 USD.

I assume that Tesla will be able to buy these improved LFP batteries from CATL. I think the examples I used in this post do show that there are very strong players in China both in battery manufacturing and car manufacturing. This should be really nothing new. Sandy Munro predicted this like 4 years ago. But yeah, I can understand Elon that he puts the 4680 program under pressure and is defensive in committing major CAPEX in this program. I expected anyway no investment from Tesla in new 4680 battery plants until after the US election.

I think what we see here is a development Tony Seba predicted many years ago and I personnaly would‘t had commit my own money in Tesla mid 2018 without his videos. CATL‘s Shenxing PLUS battery is a sign for me that ICE‘s are not going to survive in the long term. I remember his expression: „Cost curves are like gravity“. There are many many serial S-Curves and the Shenxing PLUS technology is just another one. From my point of view it allows CATL to produce a better battery for the same price. Geely and Tesla and others will be able to offer more compelling cars in the near future using CATL‘s newest LFP Battery technology.



Now to some Ideas I wanted to share for some weeks now (but didn‘t had a reason to start with). The current super charging technology from Tesla seems to be too slow in expansion of charging points. Elons vison is like to move a big portion of personal transport to his robotaxi network in a few years. The current super chargers are not going to support this. Super chargers were the right technology for the past and is still the right technology for the present. But the present doesn‘t matter. You need to skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been (Wanye Gretzky). Robotaxis need easy to scale slower charging points which can easily be installed by the vehicle owners, like 11 kW, wireless. This is just my guess, I think we will hear about it on 8/8. With future batteries which can charge extremely fast (C-rate wise), you don‘t need a big battery for a robotaxi anymore. It is obvious to me that a head of a super charging expansion organization is not able to survive under Elon if he is not able to anticipate this. The long term solution will clearly not be using a robot to put the carging cable into the charging port. I think this was just a lack of intelligence of this head. To survive under a hyper-intelligent Elon which is under pressure because of multiple concurrent developments I covered in this post, you need a high level of intelligence and of anticipation. To say Elon that you are not going to reduce the cost/head count by the requested 20 % because it is a stupid idea and implying robotaxis are not going to happen was just a stupid move under a Elon under pressure. What did this deparement head expect? That Elon will cancel his request without hearing any valid arguments? Elon does just not has time for long discussions and this was the message he sent out by laying of the whole organization. If Elon would behave like other CEO’s, he would only be so much more effective like other CEO’s.

What we are going to observe here is likely a transformation of humanity like the introduction of telecommunication. Millions of people will be jobless within a decade because of automation of transport. He just has no time to think about the workers he just laid of. I think Elon is acting with with this level of urgency because he sees no other, likely outcome for the survival of humanity on earth (than robotaxi). And so do I.
Elon acted here to maximize the probability of success. I just wanted to offer an explanation for the layoffs in this section of the post, which were also for me a surprise in the first place.
 
Anyone that's invested in TSLA for the long term and is voting no for Elon's compensation is a total moron.


No Elon means no Optimus which means no trillion dollar+ market cap with TSLA.


Emotions have distorted morons logical thoughts. Unreal.


Imagine what happens to the stock if Elon leaves. Stock drops significantly. Tesla stays just a car company and Optimus develops probably at xAI.



Again, anyone voting no is a total moron. Just sell your shares now because you're infected with a mind virus.


Go invest in Fisker and Lucid instead. Their CEO's land rockets on drone ships in the ocean and bought Twitter to preserve free speech for all.


Oh... wait....
 
Imagine what happens to the stock if Elon leaves. Stock drops significantly. Tesla stays just a car company and Optimus develops probably at xAI.

IMO this definitely happens:-

Imagine what happens to the stock if Elon leaves. Stock drops significantly

---------------------------------------------------------
And this probably doesn't happen:-

Tesla stays just a car company and Optimus develops probably at xAI.

I think FSD and Optimus will be reasonably successful at Tesla even without Elon.

But for moral and pragmatic reasons, including self-interest, I think shareholders should vote - Yes.
 
IMO this definitely happens:-



---------------------------------------------------------
And this probably doesn't happen:-



I think FSD and Optimus will be reasonably successful at Tesla even without Elon.

But for moral and pragmatic reasons, including self-interest, I think shareholders should vote - Yes.
Optimus will probably go to xAI, as will FSD, because, you know, IP theft is not a crime and its not security fraud when a CEO treats companys properties as if they were his own. Totally normal. Thats some logical thought for ya.
 
No Elon means no Optimus which means no trillion dollar+ market cap with TSLA.
What is so interesting about Optimus? Seriously. It seems like the product where Tesla has the least competitive advantage. There are several other companies doing the exact same approach as Tesla is doing with Optimus, so what's Tesla got here that's special?

This is in contrast to FSD: Tesla has a unique approach (vision-only) and unique access to data (huge fleet of cars). But Optimus has neither of those things. Sure, Tesla's a bigger company than many of the other robotics companies, but they're also late to the game and we don't know how much they're devoting to Optimus specifically.
 
IMO this definitely happens:-



---------------------------------------------------------
And this probably doesn't happen:-



I think FSD and Optimus will be reasonably successful at Tesla even without Elon.

But for moral and pragmatic reasons, including self-interest, I think shareholders should vote - Yes.

Elon is NOT motivated by money.

There is zero chance that he will abandon Tesla.

There is every chance that he will iterate, test, fail, repeat until he reaches his goal.
 
Optimus will probably go to xAI, as will FSD, because, you know, IP theft is not a crime and its not security fraud when a CEO treats companys properties as if they were his own. Totally normal. Thats some logical thought for ya.

I was wondering maybe Elon , if he loses comp vote , splitsTesla into , car & storage company , FSD/Bot company . Thus enabling him to have a larger shareholding in fsd/Bot compaany and therefore control
 
I was wondering maybe Elon , if he loses comp vote , splitsTesla into , car & storage company , FSD/Bot company . Thus enabling him to have a larger shareholding in fsd/Bot compaany and therefore control
and he will split the company with what controlling interest? Stuff of that magnitude will always be subject to shareholder approval.
 
I didn’t pick the 40k out of the blue. That’s what Tesla advertised. Yes, I know inflation, etc and I don’t plan on seeing this number. However, with a tax credit, it might be achievable. The model 3 has certainly been a good price near the original advertised of 35k even with inflation.

I remember watching several CT YT videos at the initial announcement and some petrol heads were “ho hum” until they saw the 39,900 price. That perked their ears.
There will be a $60k CT by 2027, the $40k version won't come until 2030 - CT Shanghai, CT Berlin, CT Austin all at full ramp.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: Doggydogworld
please remember Elon doesn’t like getting bullied, and taking what is his is like bullies taking his lunch money

I don't see anyone bullying him, other than a Delaware judge.

This vote is but one of several ways to resolve this issue. If it succeeds that would be great, if not, move on to the next option.

Another way to resolve it would be a successful appeal in Delaware. This could reinstate the original contract, regardless of the vote.

Beyond that, Elon and the board will figure out a way. They aren't bullying him either. Though, inclusive of the Musk brothers, the Tesla Board is a very clever group who can be trusted to come up with a viable solution.

Maybe the vote, and all the publicity it generates, will enlighten some of those who could be called to serve on the jury for an appeal in Delaware?
 
Like we have been saying...
"Tesla is one of the most crowded stocks for short selling. Tesla ranked second in the April Hazeltree Shortside Crowdedness Report with a score of 97 out of a possible 99. The score ranked Tesla second among all large-cap stocks. with a perfect score of 99."