You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the EQC specs so far:
Fully Charged Test Drives Mercedes-Benz EQC: VideoAny of this might be sandbagged, but especially the top speed, acceleration and WLTP range of this 2.5 ton SUV doesn't sound all that exciting - and even "DC fast charging" is slow compared to the 2016 design of Tesla.
- range of 417 km (259 miles) (WLTP)
- range of 445-471 km (277-293 miles) (NEDC)
- energy consumption at 20.8 - 19.7 kWh/100 km (NEDC)
- 80 kWh battery pack (384 cells)
- battery pack weight of 625 kg
- 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 5.1 seconds
- top speed of 180 km/h (112 mph)
- dual motor all-wheel drive (two asynchronous motors)
- system output 300 kW (408 HP) and 760 Nm of torque
- AC charging takes 11 hours (7.4 kW single-phase on-board charger)
- DC fast charging takes around 40 minutes (10-80% SOC)
- Length/width (incl. mirrors)/height: 4,761/1,884 (2,096) /1,623 mm
- Kerb weight (EC)/perm. GVW/payload (EC): 2,495/2,940/445 kg
- Luggage compartment (depending on equipment fitted): approx. 500 l
It certainly doesn't even come close to Tesla beating categories - and the messaging so far that emphasizes 'luxury', 'quiet ride' and various amenities suggest that Mercedes is aware of this. If that's the game plan then the I-PACE and the E-Tron mostly failed with the "more luxurious than a Tesla" messaging, not sure how much it will work for Mercedes.
(I also suspect that Tesla is waiting a bit with further announcements/enhancements until the Taycan and the EQC are out and become known quantities as well.)
Paraphrased: This is not the car for driving from Norway to Southern Europe. But the car is very comfortable and seems very solid. It's suitable for driving internally in Norway. Perfect for driving to your cabin.
- High consumption. But not as bad as e-Tron.
- Slow acceleration. You need a longer stretch to pass other cars. I had expected more from a 400hp car even if it's heavy. Fast enough for drivers used to fossils.
- Must be in Sports Mode to have full power. Pushing the pedal past the "click" point is not enough.
- Low top speed for track driving.
- Auto steering does not work well in curves. And it's vague on who is in control.
- HIgh center of gravity and large movements of the suspension - not suitable for crazy driving through corners.
- No 12V socket in front.
- No USB in the car. Only USB C.
- Lots of work and tapping on the pad to get to the menu you want. The software is not very user friendly.
- The touch screen is to far from the driver so you must lean forward to reach it.
- Range comparable to e-Tron and i-Pace. Less than Tesla, Kona, e-Niro and Ampera (aka Bolt in the US I belive).
- The SOC display is not linear. Dropping very fast the last third and does not match reality. I belive they can fix this with a software update.
- Settings for Driving Mode and Regen is reset when the car has been off.
The news feed on the Apple Stocks app is coming from Yahoo, content is nothing to do with Apple. I would assume there is a similar app on Android devices, does Google filter the news stories there?
In any case, I took a look and didn't see anything too FUDdy - which surprised me, TBH - just the German rental headline, really. In fact scroll down the stories a bit and you see these, which are rather positive, no?
View attachment 443707
Got a jpeg screenshot of points a guy named Thomas made after test driving the EQC. Since in Norwegian I'll try to translate:
I belive this was the same car Bjørn Nyland has been driving recently. So the weird SOC display might have been just this car. Or maybe not.
Sept 4th is supposed Tycan release ...
Should read as "First Taycan goes on sale Sept 4th, next Taycan will be produced and sold Oct 4th.....and so on"
And wasn't that exactly how some other tester did it, by extrapolating from a short trip? Rodent smell.Wait, so now we have two reports of that highly nonlinear SoC behavior?
That's starting to look increasingly like a cheat. There's no more obvious way to artificially inflate your car's range and efficiency than to hide all of the loss of range near the bottom of the charge cycle and hope that people don't drain it down that far.
But it could just be a bug / defect.
Wait, so now we have two reports of that highly nonlinear SoC behavior?
That's starting to look increasingly like a cheat. There's no more obvious way to artificially inflate your car's range and efficiency than to hide all of the loss of range near the bottom of the discharge cycle and hope that people don't drain it down that far.
But it could just be a bug / defect.
Bjørn Nyland said something the other day about the EQC surprising him with its efficiency. It'll be interesting to see what his results were. One of the main things that's totaled the I-Pace and E-Tron are their horrible inefficiencies. That said, I'm not sure how efficient it can be with a NEDC range that should translate to a little over 200 miles EPA (maybe up to 220 if they're lucky?), on an 80kWh pack. It doesn't have the sort of shape required for being particularly efficient, either. Also it starts tapering at under 120kW at 40% SoC (under 90 EPA miles).
I bet you haven't seen the movie, Ex Machina. When you lose, you won't even notice it.
Interesting, your feed is different than mine.
I get mostly (22 of 42) articles from Business Insider.
You do have different content. Carry on, nothing to see...
Expectations, hmm. Operational mistakes in European M3's "expansion" cannot be excluded either, possibly leading to departure of Jan Oehmicke, then Vice President of Tesla Europe, managing finance, sales and operations for the greater Europe region.I'm not sure what the actual biggest mistake around poor Q1 guidance was.
...
So perhaps the biggest mistake was believing the difficult M3 delivery expansion outside North America was going to come off without a hitch and not leave thousands of cars produced in Q1 undelivered by end of quarter. Of course unrealistically over optimistic expectations of how well difficult efforts will go according to plan has IMO been the root cause of most of the biggest mistakes made the past few years.
Back on topic.....I just almost threw my back out. Tried to bend over and pick up a big chest and the right lower side of my back seized up.
Straightened myself okout and took 4 Advil. After 10 minutes was able to get onto my bed with no pain. Still mild tightness, but I feel like I could get up and walk around. Did I dodge a bullet?
Hydrating like crazy and letting the Advil take effect for 40 mins. Am I ok to get up if I feel just minimal tightness or should I just lock it down for the day?