I found the Sandy Munroe interview to be interesting, but at the same time I had to wonder a bit. I was watching at 1.5x speed so maybe I missed something, though it didn't seem like it.
- FCA called out as the legacy manufacturer who is trying to actually develop in-house expertise
- somehow Tesla came in slightly behind iPace on power train. Given the high cost and poor efficiency that one is really hard to fathom
- BYD called out as making their own batteries for their own cars
- he thinks super capacitors are the future for EVs ("not just dry electrode, but super caps") because of using them as a buffer for regen and discharge. Talk about lack of repeatability, and you lose too much battery for a small buffer when a larger battery improves your regen & discharge rates w/ anecdote about a factory robot that did this (ignoring that the constraints are entirely different than with automotive). In other words, using super caps accentuates the problem. I guess maybe if your convinced that you must use them it becomes sort of self-fulfilling.
- the Model 3 is overdesigned to the point where it isn't any safer, it is just heavier (maybe he's right, but he's a cost engineer, not a safety engineer; then he goes on about "tanks are safe but poor efficiency" -- what, he thinks Tesla has sandbagged and could be far more efficient if only they stopped making it too heavy? He goes on to make other claims that might be true and might just be strawmen, there's no direct example or justification, just handwaving)
- worth its own point: I have often heard (doesn't make it true) that heavier vehicles fare better in accidents. And that really is the gist of his tank story. But then he goes on to say that having weight makes the vehicle less safe in an accident. I suppose if you added dark matter just for giggles, but if the weight was applied to structural integrity it might, you know, have a benefit? He then claims F1 cars are light for safety (as opposed to, say, for acceleration). When it comes to safety it really seems that Sandy Munroe just doesn't get it.
- Tesla should have used a "standard ordinary body" for the Model 3. Right... If it weighs more than a 328i then Tesla obviously did it wrong
- Model 3 margins should be much better and this is harming investors (he doesn't even try to connect the dots on this one)
- any design shop (he names two) could keep the exterior, keep the safety results, and be better cheaper. Tesla should be spending money on outsourcing!
well, that's it for the first half. I'm losing respect for Sandy.