schonelucht
Well-Known Member
Tesla advertises by getting in the news. The top headlines bleed, but that is understood. Nevertheless this will give Tesla a megaphone to proclaim that unlike those outside supplier produced panels installed years ago by an independent SolarCity, Tesla is now manufacturing its own safe solar panels and beautiful roofs.
That would be an insane message. "Hey, we used to install fire hazards but don't worry, what we will install going forward is ok". How is that not opening your business to follow up claims from home-owners with such older installation to get rid of these things (at the very least)?
No, should it be really true that the Walmart case has merit and really true that SolarCity's installations didn't follow electrical code/relevant regulations and really so that documentation generated by SolarCity on their former installations is not trustworthy, how could you not have a responsibility as the owner of SolarCity to review practices on all the other of your former installations? Juridically but also morally? Is it conscionable to let people live in homes that are at an avoidable, known and increased fire risk?