dgodfrey
Member
OTThis is only true under the assumption that all charging is done at fast charging stations. In reality most people, will use slow chargers where they park their car, work, home etc. Basically 90% of the revenue of a gas station is gone because people will slow charge majority of their driving needs. Electricity is 1/3 cost per mile compared to oil; therefore roughly 97% of gas station revenue is gone excluding merchandise sale. This is the reason I believe third party superchargers are not growing as fast. They need a gigantic fleet to break even. The cost of a supercharger must be included in the cost of the car. This where the business model is fundamentally different from oil/gas station. For traditional OEMs, this is a chicken and egg problem. Unless they sell huge number of EV cars, they cannot embark on building a gigantic network of fast chargers and they do not want to sell a large number for EVs.
I believe this is why Tesla started building Superchargers themselves because they realized that in the new EV world an OEM will also have to provide charging needs. Remember, a supercharger costs substantially lesser than a gas station.
Can't speak to the OP but my read on that wasn't contingent on the bulk of charging would need to be done outside the home to justify fast charging at convenience stores can be profitable. Granted, the vast majority of charging is done at home but there is still a huge market of away from home charging as supercharger use demonstrates.
There's a financial incentive for Sheetz and WaWa and Stewarts (convenience stores that sell gas as a lure) to transition to fast charging. If nobody used the fast chargers at these locations as you're argument seems to lead, then you would be correct. However, it's irrelevant where most charging is done if enough of it is done away from home where you are required to use public/private charging.
I believe his point was purely time based loitering at a captive necessity with temptations that after 30 minutes, that corn dog's been calling my name long enough. If I pay at the pump and can't leave the pump while pumping, gas sales that convert to corn dog sales are probably quite rare.
Where I think the public charger network has a huge disadvantage is a number of things:
- Fractured players vying for a small segment of drivers
- Disfunction of software and hardware due to numerous manufacturers specs all independent of each other, i.e. lack of homologation
- Outside of the EA penance, third party providers are not a charity. Decisions are made based on profitability either now or sometime in the future. Locations are not based on how best to serve the customer
- Related to 3, eventually, the promulgation of DCFC could end up similar to how gas stations evolved. You could have one on each corner of a busy intersection with a guy in a chicken suit waving you to come in cuz corn dogs are 2/$1 on Tuesdays. This adds to the head count of portals but doesn't add any value to interstate traveling where it's needed most.
- Peak demand charges destroy the business model. Using battery storage, some are realizing the only way to expect any profitability is to lessen the demand charges with battery and even better, solar along with it. Tesla is much better positioned to pull this off.
- Two way communication between charging stations and car. Tesla rules at this because they control the entire ecosystem.
- Vehicles with peak charging rates of 55 kW bogarting a station while the Taycan has to wait an hour for his 15 minute fill up.