Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I've been doing some investigating of Amprius. The only definite use of their silicon nanowire anodes I can find is in the Airbus Zephyr 8 (Airbus Zephyr - Wikipedia), this uses 28 kg of Amprius cells, which are probably 435 Wh/kg (Tesla's 2170 cells are about 250 Wh/kg in comparison) and very costly. (Airbus Partners with Amprius, Leader in High Energy Density Battery Technology, Amprius' Silicon Nanowire Lithium Ion Batteries Power Airbus Zephyr S HAPS Solar Aircraft). Airbus have invested in Amprius.

There are a few other companies associated with Amprius (Amprius Technologies Hosts Amprius Forum 2020), but none of these seem to be using the batteries to any great extent.

It looks like to be useful for Tesla production of the silicon nanowire anodes needs to be increased by 5 orders of magnitude and (I'm guessing here) cost reduced by 3 orders of magnitude.

Amprius also have a China design center and manufacturing site (安普瑞斯(无锡)有限公司), really hard to tell how active they are as no customers are mentioned, just potential applications of their pouch cell batteries. They also seem to be using silicon coated graphite anodes in China.

Tesla, Panasonic and NASA have all been mentioned in relation to Amprius, but not recently.
 
This is astonishing, someone as experienced as Cramer bowing to Rob is just, wow.

Congrats to Rob for what he's achieved, congrats to Jim for listening.
I think Tesla is stock that requires the focus of specialists to really appreciate the full value. Rob is a Tesla specialist, while Jim is a generalist. It's hard to be a good generalist too, but a good generalist knows how to listen to the right specialists. Jim is actually very good at explaining how generalists can misunderstand the value of a Tesla, as a genuinely disruptive innovator. So congrats to both for this enlightening conversation!
 
Last edited:
Well don't we all have our own postulation and calculation?
Mine would surely be different than any other here.

I guess you missed the context in which the OP mistakenly used Musk's 50% CAGR to apply to stock price instead of vehicle deliveries, admitted that was wrong, edited the post but kept the calculation nonetheless.

You can have your own opinions, but you can't have your own facts.
 
Fool has somehow gotten worse. Basically seeking derpa now.

Why Tesla Stock Pulled Back Today | The Motley Fool

Consider: Calling for Tesla stock to shoot up another 71% on the back of "robust and stronger than expected" demand would seem a bit irrationally exuberant in light of last week's news that registrations of Chinese-built Teslas fell 24% in July. Predicting a "perfect storm of demand" when demand just declined would seem to fly in the face of reality.

These guys have zero credibility based on this one paragraph (assuming they had any). Anyone following Tesla knows this is a common, and invariably BS argument.

Well, remember that their name is "Motley Fool." They publish articles and have recommendations in different services from different authors. Sometimes they agree, sometimes they don't. If you follow this link to the same story, but on Motley Fool's site, you can scroll down to see previous articles of varying support for the company.

This is like Seeking Alpha, except Motley Fool vets their authors more thoroughly and attracts fewer crazy people. Just MHO anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abasile
I've been doing some investigating of Amprius. The only definite use of their silicon nanowire anodes I can find is in the Airbus Zephyr 8 (Airbus Zephyr - Wikipedia), this uses 28 kg of Amprius cells, which are probably 435 Wh/kg (Tesla's 2170 cells are about 250 Wh/kg in comparison) and very costly. (Airbus Partners with Amprius, Leader in High Energy Density Battery Technology, Amprius' Silicon Nanowire Lithium Ion Batteries Power Airbus Zephyr S HAPS Solar Aircraft). Airbus have invested in Amprius.

There are a few other companies associated with Amprius (Amprius Technologies Hosts Amprius Forum 2020), but none of these seem to be using the batteries to any great extent.

It looks like to be useful for Tesla production of the silicon nanowire anodes needs to be increased by 5 orders of magnitude and (I'm guessing here) cost reduced by 3 orders of magnitude.

Amprius also have a China design center and manufacturing site (安普瑞斯(无锡)有限公司), really hard to tell how active they are as no customers are mentioned, just potential applications of their pouch cell batteries. They also seem to be using silicon coated graphite anodes in China.

Tesla, Panasonic and NASA have all been mentioned in relation to Amprius, but not recently.

Nice research, although we can likely put it to rest with the nanowire anode hype. Seebelow tweet, she's a well known researcher closely related to Teslas battery development

https://twitter.com/YingShirleyMen1/status/1297216103890862080?s=20
 
View attachment 580258
“It blows my mind, and I know it” - Elon
https://twitter.com/thirdrowtesla/status/1223850150864523264?lang=en
View attachment 580261



Are we gonna be seeing 500+ Wh/kg?

A thought, maybe Tesla will launch a few different batteries with different Wh/kg and $/Wh. LFP for Model 3/Y SR+, Maxwell for LR S/X/3/Y/Cybertruck/Semi and Amperius Silicon for Roadster/Plaid/EVTOL?!


Yes I think so. Or at least close.

Elon did not bring up EVTOL for no reason.

Not that they are going to do EVTOL, but that they have the battery capability to do it now.
 
Well, remember that their name is "Motley Fool." They publish articles and have recommendations in different services from different authors. Sometimes they agree, sometimes they don't. If you follow this link to the same story, but on Motley Fool's site, you can scroll down to see previous articles of varying support for the company.

This is like Seeking Alpha, except Motley Fool vets their authors more thoroughly and attracts fewer crazy people. Just MHO anyway.
I lost Motley's respect since they started posting so much BS about Tesla valuation. I guess its only just the authors, that don't fully comprehend Tesla. but what the hell.
 
Posting a video I just did explaining Tesla's undisclosed partnership with Amprius (a battery company that just moved next to Tesla's roadrunner facility). Hopefully it's helpful.


Nice job. Where was the old headquarters?

I don't think I can make it until Battery Day. I've never been this excited for a Tesla event before.
 
Yes I think so. Or at least close.

Elon did not bring up EVTOL for no reason.

Not that they are going to do EVTOL, but that they have the battery capability to do it now.
I agree with this. Elon woulnt bring it up for no reason. Should mean that they got the technology. Maybe it is still very expensive. But so what. They could sell S/X at twice the current price (150k Dollars) and easily slap a range of more than 500Miles or more. Important to remember, lighter the battery (most heaviest part of the car) is, less weight it has to drag around, in turn helping the range.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: UkNorthampton
I lost Motley's respect since they started posting so much BS about Tesla valuation. I guess its only just the authors, that don't fully comprehend Tesla. but what the hell.

Note that Tesla has been an active recommendation in at least one Motley Fool service since 2012, and has been recommended by other services offered by them as well during the past several years.
 
Can I interest you gentlemen in a fresh batch of afternoon hopium?
S&P 500® - S&P Dow Jones Indices
No? I'll show myself out then. :oops:

Hopium is the best drug in town yo yo. I think S and P would be stupid to not include Tesla before Battery day, especially because even us here (Tesla junkies with a crazy addiction) do not know what alien technology Elon is talking about. If I was in the commitee, It would be a crazy risk to wait until after Battery day to announce the inclusion. But then again, traditional analysts don't understand Tesla the way we do. Maybe they are still too stuck up on the profitability not exactly stemming from strong fundamentals and bla bla .