Is it possible that tweet was in reference to not needing carbon credit sales to show profits? He should have all the Q3 numbers by now
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Q3 still 22.5 days to goIs it possible that tweet was in reference to not needing carbon credit sales to show profits? He should have all the Q3 numbers by now
Well according to Karen's analysis, $NKLA are effectively paying $GM $2.7b - above my pay-grade to understand it all:
https://twitter.com/enn_nafnlaus/status/1303309538444152832
If the S&P index committee was trying to punish Tesla/TSLA by not including them in the index at this point because they did not understand or agree with their success, would this be legal? Effectively unlawful market manipulation? Not sure the SEC would be interested to look around.
Would make sense to at least see if any members of the S&P index committee, their families, friends, and any of their contacts made trades connected to advanced/insider knowledge of the committee not following their own guidelines.
Legal -- Stock Market -- SEC --- S & P
Those words definitely do not belong in the same sentence.
If you believe that Trevor and the major shareholders are just pumping the stock to cash out big time, then it makes total sense.I'm not sure how this is in any way a good deal for NKLA.
https://twitter.com/vincent13031925/status/1303407750836174848?s=20
Tesla China Achieves Production of 12,714 Units with 11,811 Units Sold in August 2020
That sounds pretty good to me. What am I missing? I heard some rumblings that were dancing around the D word up thread.
If you believe that Trevor and the major shareholders are just pumping the stock to cash out big time, then it makes total sense.
Well, we haven’t had a short week, big bear raid in a while.There's nothing wrong with "gambling" on S&P inclusion IMO. It's a perfectly understandable event where shares must be purchased. Believing the SP is going to go up due to lack of available shares is sound fundamental market thinking.
The casino feel is at least half caused by small retail investors who want to invest in Tesla regardless of price. We can call that foolish, but it's not really gambling. Nikola on the other hand......
True. Tesla can use carbon credits, but does not need them.Is it possible that tweet was in reference to not needing carbon credit sales to show profits? He should have all the Q3 numbers by now
If you mean material is in moving the needle for profits yeah probably not, but if you mean it as something real then I disagree. I'm certain we will be seeing a functional battery line. It would take some time to scale that to anything more than just handling perhaps the Plaid S/Roadster and maybe Semi.I'm surprised there's no discussion about Panasonic's expansion in GF1. This might indicate that whatever Battery Day brings, is not going to be anything immediately material. If they already had it all figured out with the new Tesla battery line production, there'd be no reason for another 3 years of more Panasonic cells. Or maybe this simply means they can gobble up all the cells they can find and still sell for a profit.
Rob have cautioned us whenever Tesla talks about run rate or capacity or whatever. It is probably using some arbitrary burst rate annualized with some "hope" built in. We have gone through this during the Model 3 ramp.I think some of us were thinking that Tesla China was already at a 200k run rate. Monthly that would be 16,700 vehicles. Looks like the run rate is closer to 150k annually. So still some ramping up yet to go.
The war against whom or what?
Shorts?
Climate?
Indexes?
Human extinction?
OEMs?
Better if not more accurate.I saw someone elsewhere suggest GM is locked into the dealer model via franchise agreements regarding direct sales of EVs, but by essentially doing 99% of the work to sell EV stuff under another companies name they can capture more of the $.
I don't care enough to check, but it's at least a better idea than "GM was drunk when they signed this deal"
“This is what happens to successful companies and successful stocks,” Carlson wrote. “If you want to earn big returns in the stock market, expect to live with big losses to get there.”