You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As further growth in revenue and FCF is expected for Q4, it is quite likely they will pay off most/all of the remaining debt in Q4.
Safe space for super bulls here:If you look back through the history of this thread, collectively we have been consistently too bearish on average. Those of us in the top 20% of bullishness made the highest returns. Collectively, we would be billions of dollars richer if we were all as bullish of as the most bullish 20%. There were bulls who lost a lot of money but that was due to short time horizons. To my way of thinking, a highly leveraged short-term call option far out of the money is not super-bullish, it's simply gambling. Being super bullish means one has a very high conviction that Tesla will succeed and prosper excessively in the long term, not that you know where the share price will be in a month.
Since 2018, I have consistently argued that Tesla is a gob-smackingly good long term investment even though I have no strong opinion as to where the share price would be next week or next month and, when it does take off, to be very careful about selling too soon. Even though I include myself in the most bullish 20% of this so-called bubble we are allegedly in (I call it reality), I would have made even more had I been even more bullish, to the point of recklessness even. As it was, I broke every traditional investment rule in the book about being over-concentrated and still I was too conservative.
I will admit that now that TSLA has increased more than 20 fold in 2 1/4 years, I'm much less bullish than I was previously. Yet I still cannot find an investment that I think has a better risk/reward ratio longer term. I would much rather see someone be too bullish than too bearish. The majority of people in the world are too bearish as evidenced by the fact that they see no compelling reason to save money and invest in productive companies.
In short, I'm baffled by those who focus on the small minority who they think are too bullish and try to paint it as if most people here tend to be too bullish. It doesn't align with the facts.
In the longer terms, Tesla will have to continually build at least a few more giga factories to meet the 20M cars per year goal. Not sure if they can achieve that without debts. Frankly, it's not necessary to focus on zero debt either. I know your statements are for fun discussion hereSo in Q3 Tesla paid off $1.5B debt, leaving only $2.1B left. As further growth in revenue and FCF is expected for Q4, it is quite likely they will pay off most/all of the remaining debt in Q4. THEN, when they no longer have any debt left and no real need to take on any more since they are printing money (lots of profit and plenty of cash on hand), will likely receive "investment grade" debt rating. How useful
Boy isn't that the truth.And Tesla has just started. In fact, it is hard to imagine its run in full scope.
You hurt S&P's feelings who is up a whole .05% today!!!$TSLA up double digits while Nas takes a huge dump? Say it aint so.....
Indeed, even the most bullish of us had not dared hope in 2019 that we would be here at $4500 presplit by 2021. Sometimes, mindbogglingly wonderful things happen to the well-prepared Tesla investor. At the darkest days of March 2020 I did not expect TSLA to go to the moon before the end of the year, but I thought it wise to prepare for a best-case scenario by at least buying two 3x out of the money March 2021 calls for a bit of my winnings of the early 2020 runup. Amazingly those two ended up going well over 100x each, worth a good number of annual incomes, life-changing really. Wild success is possible only if you've positioned yourself to take advantage of it.If you look back through the history of this thread, collectively we have been consistently too bearish on average. Those of us in the top 20% of bullishness made the highest returns. Collectively, we would be billions of dollars richer if we were all as bullish of as the most bullish 20%. There were bulls who lost a lot of money but that was due to short time horizons. To my way of thinking, a highly leveraged short-term call option far out of the money is not super-bullish, it's simply gambling. Being super bullish means one has a very high conviction that Tesla will succeed and prosper excessively in the long term, not that you know where the share price will be in a month.
Since 2018, I have consistently argued that Tesla is a gob-smackingly good long term investment even though I have no strong opinion as to where the share price would be next week or next month and, when it does take off, to be very careful about selling too soon. Even though I include myself in the most bullish 20% of this so-called bubble we are allegedly in (I call it reality), I would have made even more had I been even more bullish, to the point of recklessness even. As it was, I broke every traditional investment rule in the book about being over-concentrated and still I was too conservative.
I will admit that now that TSLA has increased more than 20 fold in 2 1/4 years, I'm much less bullish than I was previously. Yet I still cannot find an investment that I think has a better risk/reward ratio longer term. I would much rather see someone be too bullish than too bearish. The majority of people in the world are too bearish as evidenced by the fact that they see no compelling reason to save money and invest in productive companies.
In short, I'm baffled by those who focus on the small minority who they think are too bullish and try to paint it as if most people here tend to be too bullish. It doesn't align with the facts.
I really don’t understand the need to say “I live or die with Tesla”. Who is trying to impress with that statement?
I really don’t understand the need to say “I live or die with Tesla”. Who is trying to impress with that statement?
ConFession: In November of 2019 I was unmotivated so I had youtube opened and I saw Tesla was going to debut their truck. I thought, "What the hell'" and clicked on it.Indeed, even the most bullish of us had not dared hope in 2019 that we would be here at $4500 presplit by 2021. Sometimes, mindbogglingly wonderful things happen to the well-prepared Tesla investor. At the darkest days of March 2020 I did not expect TSLA to go to the moon before the end of the year, but I thought it wise to prepare for a best-case scenario by at least buying two 3x out of the money March 2021 calls for a bit of my winnings of the early 2020 runup. Amazingly those two ended up going well over 100x each, worth a good number of annual incomes, life-changing really. Wild success is possible only if you've positioned yourself to take advantage of it.
If Tesla succeeds then Climate Disruption reversal may save our life or the fossil fuels addicts will continue to destroy our livable environment who show how unethical and greedy they have become.I really don’t understand the need to say “I live or die with Tesla”. Who is trying to impress with that statement?
Plus the new chargers are the 250 kW ones and the new batteries can sustain a higher C-rate. So in terms of total fleetwide mph charging capacity, which is the real metric of concern, it's more like a 5-10x increase.
OMG! You’re all making this more difficult. I’ll stick to long math to figure out how many duffel bags I’m going to need.Sorry... FTFY:
10^7 = 10*10*10*10*10*10*10 = 10,000,000
10^8 = 10*10*10*10*10*10*10*10 = 100,000,000
e is a number, e≈2.718 so you can see what you wrote above doesn´t make sense.
Sometimes 10^7 is written as 10e7 (10 with an exponent of 7), I guess this is where you´re coming from.
Is this really true? I thought someone tested a Model 3 or Y with v2 and v3 Superchargers and found pretty minimal difference because it only sustained a high charge rate for a pretty short period of time... so adding a boost to the first 5-10 minutes of charging only saves a minute or two in total, it doesn't cut a 30min session to 20min like you'd expect if told you're going from 150 kW to 250 kW. (Though, not sharing power with adjacent stalls can itself be a big improvement -- particularly with drivers who don't know that's a thing at v2 stations.)
If the "new" batteries are better at maintaining a high charge rate, how new do the cars have to be to see a significant improvement in total charge time?
Thanks. If a moderator would kindly move these posts to its own thread, I would love to have an ongoing discussion of social bubbles. Like you, this is a matter that confronts me personally on many levels, even straining certain family relationships. I think it helpful each of us to first accept that we our already in certain bubbles. The next step is to understand why we are in these bubbles and what biases and limitations they may impose on us. And ultimately I think we want ways to challenge and the limits of our bubbles and find constructive ways to help others along. I definitely don't have the answers, but it is good to sit with the questions and to engage others along the way.