Won't this force Moodys to make an upgrade...?Possible buyback initiation or extra buffer for factories?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Won't this force Moodys to make an upgrade...?Possible buyback initiation or extra buffer for factories?
In the last 4 quarters automotive GM% has reduced from 33% to 26%, almost 2% down per quarter.Nope.
1.3*0.77 = flat so 23% ASP cut or 20% ASP cut and 25% growth.
Which is all ignoring the reality that cost of revenue does not increase at the same rate as production. Flat revenue on higher volume would still mean more gross and operating profit.
I don’t understand. Why do they need this with so much cash in the bank?
We all did expect Berlin/Texas/4680s to be a drag on margins. Add in a little bit of FX and even rising ASP couldn't even prevent margins from going down.In the last 4 quarters automotive GM% has reduced from 33% to 26%, almost 2% down per quarter.
If it stabilises at 26% that is one thing, but if it carries on falling at a rate of 7% per year that is quite another thing.
We can take it as a given that Tesla will be working as hard as ever on the cost side of the equation. We also know from Musk's recent statements that they will adjust prices to keep the expanding production capacity full. So the next few years are very much a real world experiment in what the early mass market buyers think is a tolerable price.
I hope Tesla tells us what the problem was with 4680, or at least some clarity on the issue. Maybe it wasn't a breakthrough, just incremental improvements and yields, relaxed specs, who knows.I took the opportunity to see the photos of Tesla 2 years ago:
Q4 2020:
View attachment 899802
View attachment 899803
Now:
View attachment 899804
View attachment 899806
View attachment 899808
I don’t understand. Why do they need this with so much cash in the bank?
Precautionary incase of liquidity crunch from the broader market. Tesla paid off their debts, now they have opened up an equity line of credit. It's the smart thing to do vs doing share offering diluting shareholders IF liquidity crunch happens, some major bank collapses or WW3 happens.I don’t understand. Why do they need this with so much cash in the bank?
Unwinding of the waveOnly negative news I've caught so far is the excess of production over deliveries. Excess vehicles for Q4 were 35k, up sharply from 22k in Q3. This is a clear sign of waning demand at the old price levels, IMO.
I don’t understand. Why do they need this with so much cash in the bank?
LOL. Troy is the most accurate
1.18 vs actual of 1.19.
1. Back out reg creditsIn the last 4 quarters automotive GM% has reduced from 33% to 26%, almost 2% down per quarter.
If it stabilises at 26% that is one thing, but if it carries on falling at a rate of 7% per year that is quite another thing.
We can take it as a given that Tesla will be working as hard as ever on the cost side of the equation. We also know from Musk's recent statements that they will adjust prices to keep the expanding production capacity full. So the next few years are very much a real world experiment in what the early mass market buyers think is a tolerable price.
Yeah, according to one set of figures I've compiled, Model Y IS already the top selling vehicle in the world. See here.In the midst of all the excitement over Q4 earnings, myself, @MartinAustin , and @Gigapress found time for a tiny Tesla Investor meetup in Austin last evening. In true Tesla fashion, we supped near a Tesla showroom, with at least one of us parked at the Superchargers nearby.
Much was discussed, including but not limited to the oft-undervalued longevity of Tesla vehicles, and demonstrated by MartinAustin's 2013 Model S with well over 250k miles on it - original battery and all. A lot of discussion about the possible and expected synergy with Boring Loop(s) and Tesla's lead in autonomy, combining with their lowest-cost-per-mile solution and all that implies about the future of *clean and cheap* city mobility and who might dominate it. For humor, there was some (only semiserious) gnashing of teeth over my partner's buying the "discounted" 2022 Model Y, 2 weeks before the big Jan price drop. Hey - she did her part for Q4, still excited about the free SC miles.
We all expected Model Y to be best selling car on earth shortly-- possibly there already by TTM measurement. Further discussion of the excellent, low-debt high-cash-flow financial condition of the company and the discovery of the exciting news about Giga Nevada implying a LOT more 4680's in our future helped to round out the fine and rewarding conversation.
Martin and Giga, please feel free to add your own touches.
IMO : HODL FTW (NotInvestmentAdvice)
FCF is separate from that.So what is the 4.3 billion under the “purchase of investments” about?
That seems to be the primary reason for the low FCF
Lock in on interest rates perhaps? (despite being up there already)Possible buyback initiation or extra buffer for factories?