You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2023?I think June will be good to us HODLers...
The standards group that came up with CCS is PISSED about the Ford/Tesla deal.
Sounds like GM or someone like them wrote that response.
My response to this - if there is a next time, don't build such a crappy standard when a better one already exists.
I doubt oil or gas prices are going anywhere until we see real traction in the global economy.
Plus, I don't see where anyone is measuring, but the BEV sales are starting to have a real impact. It is going to be a tough slog for OPEC to spike prices without what some people might categorize as 'unimaginable' cuts to production. And finally, cuts are all talk. SA is trying to lead by example and take one for the team. We'll see how that goes.
Capped at 220.![]()
He resembles, in some respects, Herbert Diess. Excessive candor can be debilitating if union, supplier and bureaucratic resistance coincide.I just finished this interview, it's really very good. I like Farley a lot, seems brutally honest and straightforward even about the bad stuff.
Speaking of which, has anyone else noticed that all (maybe almost) GM commercials currently on TV are for ICE vehicles? Until recently they were all for Cadillac BEV's that didn't yet exist...ugh GM ... they have 0 interest in building BEVs... this time could be the end for GM ... I certainly hope so ... they have hade enough chances
Plus, I don't see where anyone is measuring, but the BEV sales are starting to have a real impact.
To be clear, GM never had much to do with CharIN. The 'committee' was dominated by electric utilities and equipment suppliers when the CCS standard first was made. There were OEMs there, but all the OEMs bought all their equipment from the vendors who led the rule making. OEM involvement was typically rather like VAG's approach to any components, i.e. let the Tier One suppliers figure out the details and we'll assemble their products in our vehicles.The standards group that came up with CCS is PISSED about the Ford/Tesla deal.
![]()
CharIN is not thrilled about the Ford/Tesla charging deal - Charged EVs
Ford and Tesla recently reached an agreement that will give Ford EV customers access to Tesla’s network of 12,000 North American Superchargers starting in 2024. What’s more, Ford says it will equip future EVs with Tesla’s NACS charging port starting in 2025. The deal is the talk of the EV...chargedevs.com
Sounds like GM or someone like them wrote that response.
My response to this - if there is a next time, don't build such a crappy standard.
Just the regularly scheduled MMD.MM's apparently woke up and ordered the walkdown
We should celebrate though, as $TSLA did reach a 26 week high![]()
Like a market making front runner I get all the meaty information before the rest of you do.
They adopt NACS as CCS Type 3 and all their arguments go away. Even if the reliability issues get somehow solved no one can argue a CCS connecter is better. It's clunky and difficult to insert and remove.The standards group that came up with CCS is PISSED about the Ford/Tesla deal.
![]()
CharIN is not thrilled about the Ford/Tesla charging deal - Charged EVs
Ford and Tesla recently reached an agreement that will give Ford EV customers access to Tesla’s network of 12,000 North American Superchargers starting in 2024. What’s more, Ford says it will equip future EVs with Tesla’s NACS charging port starting in 2025. The deal is the talk of the EV...chargedevs.com
Sounds like GM or someone like them wrote that response.
My response to this - if there is a next time, don't build such a crappy standard.
They adopt NACS as CCS Type 3 and all their arguments go away. Even if the reliability issues get somehow solved no one can argue a CCS connecter is better. It's clunky and difficult to insert and remove.