Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
(if I had not needed the endorphin "fix" of the casino of trading, and just DCA'd, i would have 20x the number of shares) :(
If we had not trimmed our TSLA positions before the splits we would have 53% more shares.

If we had not used the proceeds to invest in the “next Teslas” we would be a bit better off. (I don’t want to do the math on that one.)

If the dog hadn’t stopped to………rabbit.
 
$3B? We could have a whip-round hare and buy the company for that!
Factually, had we the credit lines we could buy the entire thing on margin and pay it off from dividends.
That would vastly increase my exposure to AAPL, but the increase in net worth could make several of us the world's wealthiest people by a huge margin. Elon would no longer be among the wealthiest, nor Arnault.
The capital gains alone could approach eliminating a national deficit or two.

I guess this is OT unless we could somehow buy TSLA for a similar discount from the present market price.
 
Check out this video showing thousands of BYD cars not being used. The creator of the video is extremely biased and talks a lot of unnecessary words, but good info point about how BYD got such a high number of EV's
There’s been enough anecdotal evidence for there to be at least a material chance that BYD is engaging in murky (channel stuffing their inventory and counting them as sales) to downright fraud (counting sales that they have of intention of ever actually selling). It's no secret that a good amount of their profit comes from government subsidies. They live off the Chinese governments teet.

Given the fact that BYD just the other day said openly they will not be entering the US market, sure you could take their word and say it's because of the IRA, but it could also be that they do not want to invite scrutiny. If their cost structure was so good, then even without the IRA, they should still be able to undercut a lot of legacy auto makers (who also aren't getting the IRA credit, or at least the full amount) and do decent sales.
 
There’s been enough anecdotal evidence for there to be at least a material chance that BYD is engaging in murky (channel stuffing their inventory and counting them as sales) to downright fraud (counting sales that they have of intention of ever actually selling). It's no secret that a good amount of their profit comes from government subsidies. They live off the Chinese governments teet.

Given the fact that BYD just the other day said openly they will not be entering the US market, sure you could take their word and say it's because of the IRA, but it could also be that they do not want to invite scrutiny.


Given they would remain a Chinese based company- what scrutiny do you image selling the US would bring that their selling in Europe does not, given the EU is certainly more highly regulated than the US?

If their cost structure was so good, then even without the IRA, they should still be able to undercut a lot of legacy auto makers (who also aren't getting the IRA credit, or at least the full amount) and do decent sales.

25% tariff on cars imported from China is a pretty massive hurdle to overcome even ignoring the IRA stuff.
 
I was at a birthday party at McDonalds (please don't ask... this what you've done to the world, US of A),
and a wild EV appeared.
This is the new Folgore, the EV from Maserati. Probably >200k€. This is the 94kWh version.
I was my son so I had to go, couldn't ask anything else.
WhatsApp Image 2023-06-15 at 20.05.07.jpeg
WhatsApp Image 2023-06-15 at 20.05.07(1).jpeg
WhatsApp Image 2023-06-15 at 20.05.05.jpeg
 

I’m glad they carved out an exception for automakers of exclusively electric vehicles, but it seems like that could be challenged by ICE manufacturers, (to allow for direct sales), or ICE dealers, to disallow direct sales of electric vehicles).

Don’t read the last paragraph, it is too political.
 

I’m glad they carved out an exception for automakers of exclusively electric vehicles, but it seems like that could be challenged by ICE manufacturers, (to allow for direct sales), or ICE dealers, to disallow direct sales of electric vehicles).

Don’t read the last paragraph, it is too political.
Incredibly bullish.
There was a time that Tesla had so little political clout that there would have been no carve-out for EVs.
It would appear ... that time is past.

Still working on my avatar. Intended to show Tesla, these last few months, as punching (biting?) well above its weight. Underestimate at your own peril.