I like it!Mod: A reminder that we have very little tolerance for attacks on other members. --grrrr.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like it!Mod: A reminder that we have very little tolerance for attacks on other members. --grrrr.
I hear ya, almost daily now (bullish FSD).Uh... what?
L5 doesn't need any approval, from anybody, to put on the road in at least a dozen US states.
Right now.
If you put an L5 car on the road in Nevada next week- which you can do with no government approval at all then it's still an L5 car even if it's not approved in California.
L4 vs L5 is about capability, not legality. CAN it safely drive anywhere a human can? If yes it's L5. Those don't exist today though.
If you want that L5 car to drive into OTHER states (or countries) that do NOT allow them, that's obviously different LEGALLLY-- but that's the same as an L3 car- or an L4 car- both of which could cross state and country borders, and has nothing to do with "L5 needs government approval" and that limit doesn't make it not L5.
There's not even a government agency to approval it federally in the US for example-- NHTSA does not regulate such things at this time- leaving that regulation entirely to US states... which is WHY it's already legal in a number of them without anyone needing to "approve" it.
It's baffling this keeps coming up and keeps needing correcting-- often of and by the same folks.
Explain to me how I can ride hail a robotaxi from Nevada to California today without regulatory approval?
I am not talking about the car capabilities but the robotaxi service that requires regulatory approval. If Elon wants the service to be avaliable with all routes enabled with zero geo fencing, then it requires regularly approval.Explain to me how you keep confusing SAE levels with local laws.
"regulatory approval" has nothing at all to do with a vehicle being L4 vs L5 as you suggested.
A car capable of driving anywhere a human can is L5. Even if not every where a human can legally allows that.
Further- such a car can be put on the road without any "regulatory approval" at all in a bunch of US states right now- and the fact there might be OTHER states it'd break the law to enter does not change the SAE Level of the system.
Are you carrying fruit or nuts?Explain to me how I can ride hail a robotaxi from Nevada to California today without regulatory approval?
I am not talking about the car capabilities but the robotaxi service that requires regulatory approval. If Elon wants the service to be avaliable with all routes enabled with zero geo fencing, then it requires regularly approval.
Both statement are true, Tesla's system is not good enough for RT, and go anywhere RT requires regulatory approval.Tesla not having a system they trust as an RT yet is, and "the regulators" is not a barrier to changing that.
Good news.... This is not possible in a Tesla. Door opens, you exit, it's in park automatically (as IIf only a wheel would have fallen off this loss could have been averted.Toyota bZ4X driver forgets to shift to Park, EV ends up going for tragic swim
As the driver left the Toyota bZ4X, the all-electric crossover started rolling towards the water. Efforts to save the EV were unsuccessful.www.teslarati.com
Good news.... This is not possible in a Tesla. Door opens, you exit, it's in park automatically (as Irecallremember, any 2 of 3 conditions met will put it in park (Door, Seat Belt, Seat Sensor). You couldn't even trick it if you climbed out the window. It's surprising that this wasn't addressed at Toyota, unless it was a malfunction... which is possibly even worse. This is not Poka-Yoke for the consumer side, and is unlike Japan. Maybe they're under pressure.
Now you´re making stuff up. He always compares his estimates to the real data once it comes out. You can ignore him all you want but please stop the nonsense Troy bashing here it is getting so tiresome.
Do agree though he is sometimes not clear on interpretation vs. facts in his theses, but please don´t mix that up with his numbers.
It's not correct (the Teslarati article), but we get the point. I can drive with my door open (Seat belt and weight engaged, just did it). This is handy for getting unstuck or backing up with a better view.That was mentioned in the Teslarati article. Sort of turned it into a Tesla ad.
Anywhere else, somebody would have been fired for writing that.
Troy's latest X post, He is suggesting Y id demand limited, I wonder what his evidence is for this, given it's the best selling car in the world I find this rather unintuitiuve.
If only a wheel would have fallen off, this loss could have been averted.Toyota bZ4X driver forgets to shift to Park, EV ends up going for tragic swim
As the driver left the Toyota bZ4X, the all-electric crossover started rolling towards the water. Efforts to save the EV were unsuccessful.www.teslarati.com
There's a lot of mixing of Robotaxi and FSD. They are obviously linked, but Robotaxi can obviously come before FSD is solved via a dedicated car that is geofenced. That is outside of the scope of solved FSD will work everywhere and doesn't need geofencing.
I said this in the V12 thread, but people confuse them because they assume Robotaxi will come to consumer vehicles. It's illogical to believe that would occur before Tesla owned Robotaxi vehicles.
The terms we should be using are supervised autonomy and full autonomy.
My guess is that it is because there are more people willing to buy than willing to sell on yesterday's price.Anyone care to explain (guess) why we have buying today, with Troy stuff, on Options Fri, and Max Pain at 185 still?
Somebody knows something...