Why can't all Americans be as intelligent as you? Why are there people in Wyoming?
Here's the thing -- Americans tend to place a ton of faith in their constitution and institutions. This faith is misplaced. The #1 thing protecting democracy is the people themselves. A democracy is only as healthy as its people themselves. #2 is the media, and #3 is the judiciary. Politicians are somewhere down the list. Trump is single handedly destroying these institutions, and his primary focus has been on #1 & #2. So when you say Republican politicians aren't standing on their morals you're correct, but neither are their constituents; they're just idiots for the most part. So for me the question becomes -- what happens to a democracy when the people aren't informed enough to understand what's good for them? This is where I think we are, and I think it's an insanely dangerous place.
Did you read about the two Russians connected to the Steele dossier that suddenly had fatal heart attacks within the week after the dossier was leaked?
Yes of course. The problem though is that in this situation is it's an open question whether Trump has co-opted enough institutions to make the rule of law irrelevant. We're not there yet, but we're definitely not far from it. The American Supreme Court has been completely co-opted. Trump is trying really hard, working his base of idiots. At that point the rule of law becomes the rule of law as it is in Russia and China, where money talks and poor people die in misery and anonymity.
This is best case scenario. I used to be 50/50 which way this would go, and I hoped for the best. I always thought.. "you know there's too many intelligent, non-bigoted people in New York & California for Trump to succeed", but lately I've become more pessimistic. The pillars of democracy are weakening, day by day.
This is the litmus test for me. I will not be at all surprised if, once re-elected, Trump immediately pivots to a discussion of removal of term limits, a la Putin. That will be the end if he does that.[/quote][/QUOTE]
I agree. What happened is that a few who opposed Trump were voted out. Trumps base made sure of that. After that, the choice for remaining Congressmen became easy. You either fall in line, keep your job, hold your nose, and help Trump implement his agenda, which for the most part is their agenda, b/c they vote on it... or you stand up for you principles, such as it is not ok to role model those things that the President does towards women etc. and start looking for a new job for yourself. Unfortunately, it does look like the majority of Republican congressmen either did not have principles or sold them out, probably justifying that sale in their mind by saying that getting things done is more important than the collateral damage, including to your own moral and to your family's and to the families of the rest of Americans.
Here's the thing -- Americans tend to place a ton of faith in their constitution and institutions. This faith is misplaced. The #1 thing protecting democracy is the people themselves. A democracy is only as healthy as its people themselves. #2 is the media, and #3 is the judiciary. Politicians are somewhere down the list. Trump is single handedly destroying these institutions, and his primary focus has been on #1 & #2. So when you say Republican politicians aren't standing on their morals you're correct, but neither are their constituents; they're just idiots for the most part. So for me the question becomes -- what happens to a democracy when the people aren't informed enough to understand what's good for them? This is where I think we are, and I think it's an insanely dangerous place.
Why? Leverage. Robert Steele's dossier was not disproven. In fact, some line items from it were confirmed by FBI. But most likely the witnesses who could confirm other line items are no longer around, taken care of by Putin.
Did you read about the two Russians connected to the Steele dossier that suddenly had fatal heart attacks within the week after the dossier was leaked?
What cannot be proven, cannot be used against Trump in the Court of Law.
Yes of course. The problem though is that in this situation is it's an open question whether Trump has co-opted enough institutions to make the rule of law irrelevant. We're not there yet, but we're definitely not far from it. The American Supreme Court has been completely co-opted. Trump is trying really hard, working his base of idiots. At that point the rule of law becomes the rule of law as it is in Russia and China, where money talks and poor people die in misery and anonymity.
I think that people get tired of status quo that doesn't work for them. So, once in a while they challenge the status quo and cause the pendulum of history to swing wildly. This time towards nationalism, protectionism, isolationism. I hope that it will not go too far and that Trump will serve us as a vaccination against Nazi Germany, not take us all the way there.
When significant portion of the population wants to probe that direction you can't just un-elect Trump back the next day. This exploration needs to run its course and, hopefully, peacefully.
Then the pendulum may swing in another direction and we'll have opposite problems to discuss.
This is best case scenario. I used to be 50/50 which way this would go, and I hoped for the best. I always thought.. "you know there's too many intelligent, non-bigoted people in New York & California for Trump to succeed", but lately I've become more pessimistic. The pillars of democracy are weakening, day by day.
I'm holding my fingers crossed against Trump's 2nd term - I'm hoping people had seen enough.
If not, life goes on and the only consolation is that there can't be more than 2 terms of Trump.
This is the litmus test for me. I will not be at all surprised if, once re-elected, Trump immediately pivots to a discussion of removal of term limits, a la Putin. That will be the end if he does that.[/quote][/QUOTE]
Last edited: