JRP3
Hyperactive Member
Hopefully in the next debate Obama can correct Mr. Romney with the facts about Tesla's success. A good point to make that a few failures are inevitable when pushing new technologies but the successes are worth it.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If my target is to break 100 how long would you guess it could take?
If my target is to break 100 how long would you guess it could take?
If my target is to break 100 how long would you guess it could take?
If Tesla sticks with the mission to accelerate the electric revolution, they will never rake in profits. All money will go into R&D or infrastructure projects. They have the Gen III platform and the worldwilde rollout of Supercharger network on their hands as the next thing. When Elon is done with cars, he might start development of electric planes and hyperloop system.
Tesla will never just make cars with 25% gross margin and pour the money over the shareholders. The remarkable thing will be a sustained R&D budget that grows along with the company and will exceed the efforts of major competitors perhaps in 2017.
Speaking of P/E... Qualcomm for example have P/E over 20 for ages. And have market capitalization bigger then Nissan and Daimler combined. Why invest into Qualcomm instead of Nissan or Daimler or even Intel? All three not just well established and profitable companies but they have P/E less then 10! But the way market see it, Qualcomm have HUGE potential for future grows. And because of that potential P/E could be on unsustainable level.Current market cap is ~$3bln. At a P/E of 10 that would imply ~$300mil/year in earnings (which do not exist yet). I suspect that Tesla needs to sell something close to ~20k/units per year to make that kind of scratch. Because 20k/units is Tesla's current yearly goal that is acts to support the stock at $30/share, at least to the extent that investors expect the company to be able to produce and sell that many cars.
Speaking of P/E... Qualcomm for example have P/E over 20 for ages. And have market capitalization bigger then Nissan and Daimler combined. Why invest into Qualcomm instead of Nissan or Daimler or even Intel? All three not just well established and profitable companies but they have P/E less then 10! But the way market see it, Qualcomm have HUGE potential for future grows. And because of that potential P/E could be on unsustainable level.
My point, it is not really required for Tesla to produce big enough profits to get P/E to around 10. Even half or 1/3 of those profits might be good enough to drive price of shares to $100/share level... As long as market would believe that Tesla have a potential for enormous grow. P/E could be well in the 20-30 range when $100 price will be reached.
If Tesla is able to become cash flow positive in November or December what is everyone's thoughts on what that will do to the stock? I would assume if all other indicators (incoming reservations, no recalls, more positive reviews) remain strong that the cash flow positive moment could be the potential turning point for the stock that we have all been anxiously awaiting. Would love to hear other investors thoughts on this.
Blake
- - - Updated - - -
Feature Flick: Tesla Model S Out-Drags BMW M5 - Rumor Central
it has to be seen as sustainable.
A combination of (a) cash-flow positive, (b) solid ramp-up in deliveries, and (c) continuing increases in reservation rates will make an enormous difference in the stock value. Point (a) alone won't be as powerful; it has to be seen as sustainable.
A combination of (a) cash-flow positive, (b) solid ramp-up in deliveries, and (c) continuing increases in reservation rates will make an enormous difference in the stock value. Point (a) alone won't be as powerful; it has to be seen as sustainable.