LOL. Apparently the rest of the world's introduction of the 3 isn't a thing that's going to happen, eh?
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
LOL. Apparently the rest of the world's introduction of the 3 isn't a thing that's going to happen, eh?
But you left out the details that he just wanted to re-short at a higher price: Gabe Hoffman on Twitter
So no change of heart.
OK Maybe you were talking about Richard Pearson/MoxReports: MoxReports on Twitter
But he sort of contradicts himself, as just 2 hours prior to that he said he wasn't long TSLA. And Tesla had already moved up the earnings release... Did it really take him that long to find out that Tesla announced a date?
Last edited:
Ok, I don't yet have C devices, but I understand you can use physical adapter between C and older peripherals, b/c underlying standards are compatible.
It's understandable when sometimes there's a jump in technology and you need to upgrade.
But if only one type of connection is considered at the start and others are not honoured that's a different scenario - you just can't use it if support for different adapters isn't there.
Why do some people put “not an advice” on their posts? Is there some sort of mandatory disclaimer for financial advisors posting on discussion boards? Also why not just say “not advice”. Sorry if this is a stupid question. * Not an apology.
@TrendTrader007 used to put that at the end of all his ridiculously bullish posts and some others followed, mostly as a joke.
humbaba
sleeping until $7000
I see where you are coming from. Where some of the difference in view comes in is that the legacy makers still haven't seemed to really get it (other than maybe VW). For example, the insistence on continuing to shoehorn an EV into an ICE design. This is part of the reason why the Tesla vehicles are the safest vehicles made. Even more, the legacy manufacturing expertise doesn't really apply to EVs. I mean, it does in some limited ways, but the overlap is much smaller than most people think. It is definitely smaller than what I thought it was before educating myself.
To me, the biggest risk for the legacy makers is collapsing sales preventing them from having the money to finally do it right and make a worthwhile EV. But as Mercedes, BMW and Daimler are already discovering, that ship may have already sailed. Ford still lives because it will take years for Tesla to make a truck, but they are already hurting, downsizing, restructuring, to try and save themselves. My fear is that it is too little, too late. Too much of Ford's brand identity is tied to coal rolling.
And I say fear because I am afraid. I don't like the economic impact of the legacy makers folding or hitting up the federal government for another bailout. It will cost jobs, and it will cost more jobs than if they had just manned up and accepted and pursued EV instead of stalling and trying to kill it. I'm looking squarely at GM, there. The company could die for all I care given the harm its done, but I have relatives who work there and that isn't fair to them or their families. GM should do the right thing.
So I'm not that concerned with the legacy makers ramping up their EVs, but I'm concerned with their offerings being generally meh and even the better ones not providing a compelling reason to purchase them. If the best you have is that you can buy it now rather than wait for a Tesla... that's a risky game of chicken to play with Tesla's aggressive growth plan.
sub
Active Member
Who’s laughing now bitch? Apparently he just learned to “read” as he stated a few times.
This clown has destroyed his credibility going forward, anyone choosing to follow him will be mocked. He comes off as surprisingly stupid, and I thought TSLA shorts were moronic to begin with.
disclaimer:I am far from an expert.
If you expect your shares to get called away, then couldn’t you buy different calls that you intend to execute. Instead of buying back the oct. 26 $295 at $15 you could buy some extremely DITM calls (like the 230’s or 240’s), if you can afford it, they will get you closer to not taking such a loss if your shares get called a way and if they do, you can then execute your new calls. I’m attaching a picture of the calls I’m talking about. I think you could get 40 of those at open tomorrow, not sure (of course this would cost about $400k).
I get your point, but you remember all of the difficulties Mercedes had with their first SUV's, the M models? It was major, and I foresee something similar with the battery vehicles as well. One of the reasons may very well be the batteries themselves. While some of these big OEM's may have had battery powered (or hybrid) cars previously, let's see how they compare using LG or other batteries. They may be farther ahead in manufacturing body parts and assemblies, but Tesla has them beat when it comes to battery assemblies and motors and lessons learned.
Time will tell my friend, that's for sure, but suffice it to say, it's going to be an interesting ride for the next few years and I think we've picked the right horse to bet on.
Fact Checking
Well-Known Member
More empathy please, that poor short just went through the biggest shell-shock of his life: a fellow believer just switched from "TSLA is a zero" to "TSLA is the next trillion dollar company".
That's a lot to take in for a guy, and you cannot really blame him for trying to blunt the pain with copious amounts of alcohol, and seeing double letters through teared up eyes is not good to your grammar, nor is it conducive to basic coherence of logic for that matter.
So cut him some slack!
I wouldn't be surprised if whatever options they cut it down to for S/X, we don't see them reintroduced before either the expected/rumored interior refresh to be more in line with the 3's styling, or a full on model update (switch to 3/Y style architecture, using 2170 cells, etc) which would include said interior update.
Did anyone else notice the irony in one of Sméagol’s twitter replies to Andrew Left when he castigated him for looking backwards at q3? Looking backwards at q1&2 was absolutely the shorts favorite talking point when discussing “cash burn”.
I watch this stuff because the people that link it I respect. But man these people in the videos just stammer and struggle to admit there is a MASSIVE sea change coming.
It's like the titanic they cant change course...they just can't.
bhtooefr
Active Member
sundaymorning
Active Member
How will tomorrow AH trade like if Tesla is cash flow positive in the following range:
A. $200-300 million
B. $300-500 million
C. $500-700 million
D. Above $700
A. $200-300 million
B. $300-500 million
C. $500-700 million
D. Above $700
sundaymorning
Active Member
Citron’s u-turn was a classic case of “pumping & dumping.”
Pump the negative narrative, attract more unsuspecting dumb shorts, and then dump a massive load on the unsuspecting.
Congrats to the dumb shorts for sticking around, Citron just wrote your obituary.
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
