Yamantasdivar
Member
I feel like the price should react more. Everyone was surprised by the announcement! Can anyone help me understand why it hasn’t and when it will? Thank you kindly.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A) Sorry, I did miss your comment on multiple tweets.
B) I thought final decision was to build Model Y on the same platform, so yes that was my argument.
You needed more proof?Not even mad if we end the day in red, just to finally get a proof how irrational the market can be.
If they are hiring drivers to drive company-owned cars they are not an "Uber-like" service. They are a taxi company that has to pay a minimum hourly wage. That is one of several advantages Uber and Lyft have over traditional taxi companies where drivers complain of making as low as $5 per hour after expenses. And even at that, Uber and Lyft are not making money yet.There is a taxi company started from Hangzhou, China. They buy EVs from Geely, and hire drivers to provide Uber like service. They have been very successful in Hangzhou so they are expanding to other cities.
曹操专车
The car they are using sells for 200k RMB, vastly inferior to my model 3. How do I know? I used their service a couple dozen times and talked to the drivers.
Now imagine 35k$ model 3 in China without the tariff!
link?Just watched (skimmed) the Future Investment Initiative day 3 video. No mention of Tesla. Honestly given the current climate around the Kingdom I think we are better off without any kind of announcement. Although I wouldn’t mind if Tesla sold them a bunch of solar and powerpacks.
I think it's pretty important to be able to discern pedestrians, bicyclists and moving objects in order to "drive well". Autopilot already handles these pretty well.
GM's self-driving car reportedly has trouble recognizing pedestrians
V9 has pedestrians!
If they are hiring drivers to drive company-owned cars they are not an "Uber-like" service. They are a taxi company that has to pay a minimum hourly wage. That is one of several advantages Uber and Lyft have over traditional taxi companies where drivers complain of making as low as $5 per hour after expenses. And even at that, Uber and Lyft are not making money yet.
Until drivers can be eliminated from the equation ride-hailing is a break even at best proposition.
A division of my transport company, operated crew cab pickup trucks to deliver RV's across the U.S. and Canada out of the factories in Indiana. The manufacturer pay rates are tough. Without tight cost controls and volume savings on fuel and maintenance discounts, most independent contractors go belly up after a few years when it comes time to replace a transmission or rebuild an engine. The RV transport industry already knows this and that is why they are constantly hiring new drivers with their own trucks who want to take a shot at the "easy" money. Pretty much the only successes in this business are retirees who use the trips to cover their travel expenses to places they want to visit.
Uber and Lyft have been no different. They churn through drivers continuously because they are not making enough money. As the miles rack up (for full-time drivers) they forget to allocate depreciation for the miles. It hits them in the face when it comes to repairs and vehicle replacement.
The trick for Tesla will be to convince the public that the BEV is worthy of a premium price for (pick your reason). Without a premium price, it will be very difficult if not impossible to make a ride-hailing service profitable until drivers are out of the picture. Of course, then there will be equal competition from other providers. Uber and Lyft could easily go bankrupt before then unless rates increase to riders. I think Tesla should stick be being the vehicle manufacturer and leave this money-losing business to others.
In your China example, the company started in one city so that they could get enough depth to support a service. I believe Tesla will have a hard time finding enough owners in any given city to support 24/7 operations with adequate coverage to minimize rider wait times. The average Tesla buyer makes over $100,000 a year. You really expect those people to burn up their cars and free time making $10/hr or less?
Thank you Elon and Team Tesla. Keep up the mission.
It seems we all knew what’s going on, but the analysts don’t know.
Raise it to what?@GerberKawasaki
Now that Tesla has an positive eps estimate. Maybe $6-$8 per share over the next year. Every analyst MUST raise their estimates Jonas at MS got his note out first. Titled. “I’m just so wrong about Tesla”
They've talked about that here in CA as well (I think they might have actually already approved it, but maybe not implemented it). The logic being that so much of state DOT revenues are based on gas taxes, and with no gas taxes being paid for by EV drivers - then no tax. It's clearly true that if EVERYONE moved to an EV and that was the financial model to pay for DOT road upgrades, repairs, etc, we'd ALL be screwed for sho.. So, something will have to change in the future as the percentage of EV vehicles on the road move from 1-2 to 4 to 8% of the overall vehicles.
At least here in CA I think it was only something like a 125$ additional fee on the annual registration. Not TOO big a deal.
Although I mostly agree the volatility won't go away but I don't think we need to wait for another quarter before we see another climb up from here. Large institutions will begin to accumulate soon, they will be careful not to cause price spike, but when news are out, that is another story.
Face it, nearly 900 mil free cash flow caught everybody by surprise, including us here. Put in perspective, members of this forum are the most informed when it comes to Tesla's financials. If we are pleasantly surprised, what about others? Plus it is easy for us to accept this fact because this information confirmed and strengthened our belief. What about those people who have been selling us cheap shares in the past several month?
From twitter, it is pretty apparent the shorts are in the first stage of grief: denial. You know, to write something truly convincing you have to believe it first. I guess the shorts peddling false information are true believers of their own koolaid. When the earning report completely destroyed their world view, it will be painful and slow for them to go from denial to anger to...
And there are institutions who sold in the past month or so. It will take a while for them to admit mistake and change courses.
Profits are not all created equal, last time Tesla used all kinds of tricks to get to a profitable quarter. This is different. Even with ASP going down in the 4th quarter, it is very difficult to see Tesla going into red again. I think this report alone already removed all doubt about whether Tesla can pay its bills. And that was the gist of bear thesis.
Another surprise is Elon's behavior on the earnings call. He refuses to give any aspirational goal, only said things alone the line of this is something we are working on, we achieved this, which will make it easy for us to do that. Some of us even find it boring, some has negative interpretation of this. But this is what large investors want.
fasten your seat belt and enjoy the ride, I bought tuesday at 276, yesterday right before closing at 289, and about another ago at 304.
That's sort of interesting. As it stands, Tesla does basically ZERO marketing or advertising, relying solely on owners and showrooms for building awareness and interest. It would be interesting if internally at TESLA they had moved to some types of product placement, in shows, movies, etc., in some fashion. ti's usually a more complementary form of advertising, not in lieu of usually, but it would be interesting is somewhere internally they had decided to put product placement in the mix for a start.But on a positive note I've noticed quite a few more Teslas showing up on TV shows recently. For instance, on Chicago PD last night, the bad guy was being driven in a Model X (by a good guy... kinda) and it was way cool to see one of the falcon wing doors open.
That's great, cheap advertising. I suppose the cops kept the car though...
No the rate was the average rate per week in 3rd qtr. He did say he could not see them dipping below 5000 a week in response to what happens when credit goes away next yr (he didnt even bother to correct phil baboon that it decreases but doesnt go away)They did answer some of those throughout the call I think or in the letter. The one I remember for you is current rate is about 4200 or 4300 per week for m3. The stated they think 7k without too much more capex spend.
Raise it to what?
At your $8 that is a P/E ratio of 37.5 for $300 SP. That exceeds almost every company in the tech industry. Most auto OEMs are in the single digits. How high would you have them price TSLA since Musk was clear that growth from here forward will be internally financed?
I agree that he got away without predicting is crazy good. How can you miss if not predicted. It was more a comment of the analysts not pinning him down. How can you possibly predict or model earnings without knowing that metric or even curoous to ask for it. We are already 1/3 of the way through the qtr and i am sure they already know november output. There is a potential for an enormous surpriseIt's tempting to believe that Elon is playing "rope a dope" for a change, as opposed to "over promise and under deliver".
How can Q4 not be good? I finally want ValueAnalyst to post a Q4 poll and she is MIA.
Nice try but I aint clicking on boomberg...bugerburg...bullshatberg..bolonyberg...bobsyouruncleburg ...bettyboopberg...butthurtberg...or even blooperrealberg.Yeah, like that jerk Sandy Munro you guys don't like:
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?