Tslynk67
Well-Known Member
I vote for Eindhoven, Netherland.
Indeed, not many Dutch that don't speak English. Or Flanders in Belgium is another possibility.
Can't be UK, obviously, with Brexit (idiots...), plus wrong side of La Manche...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I vote for Eindhoven, Netherland.
Indeed, not many Dutch that don't speak English. Or Flanders in Belgium is another possibility.
Can't be UK, obviously, with Brexit (idiots...), plus wrong side of La Manche...
It was only since the last CC that Tesla has stated that Model Y wouldn’t be built in Fremont. In the past they claimed that Fremont might go to 1M cars. By the end of 2018 (or whenever they are at the 10K/week M3 rate) they will be at 600K. I seriously doubt that they only figured out last month that would max out Fremont. The only explanation I can imagine for the sudden statement that Model Y will not be produced in Fremont is to use remaining space for more Model 3 production. Which could mean Model 3 production could go to 1M in 2019/2020. There you have the financing for Model Y gigafactory: 25% margin on an extra 500K Model 3s.
An new gigafactory for Model Y would also explain the Model Y delay to 2020, as building a new fab would need more time than installing equipment in Fremont.
...
It will be impossible to find those people in Southern Europe. I live in Spain, and here, young people hardly know what software engineering is. Couple to that, the influence of the trade unions, 35 hour weeks and a government hostile to solar energy and innovation then it is not an attractive place at all for Tesla.
...
My two cents here:
Well, do you have evidence to back your opinion? I'm asking as a Spanish software engineer who's lived in London for a while now and who's been paid by several American and British companies. There are hundreds of thousands of software engineers living in Spain and dozens of thousands working all over the world.
As a Belgian, I pretty sad to about this perception of Belgium, and certainly from somebody who barely lives 1000km away from us.I would avoid Belgium at all costs. Trade unions rule, 35 hour weeks, loads of holiday, constant strikes, 50% tax rate... very socialist country
I really doubt this is how it's going to work.
First, we shouldn't be expecting 10k/week this year. We should be getting 5k/week sustained in late June to mid July (cautiously optimistic prediction), followed by a cost and process optimisation interval ("3 months probably, 6 months definitely") during which all the remaining versions are slowly added to production, and only after that we will see a slower ramp towards 10k/week. To be fair, I doubt Elon will have the patience or the diligence to fully optimise the production process at 5k/week before starting the next ramp up towards 10k, but that's another discussion and we're not there yet. So overall I fully expect Tesla to reach 10k/week production rate for the Model 3 at some point in the first half of 2019. We may exit 2018 at 7-8k/week.
Once 10k/week is reached, it really wouldn't make sense for them to try to squeeze further increases in Model 3 production at Fremont, instead they will probably be in some advanced stages of building another factory either in China (most likely) or in Europe, or both. Then, for the Model Y, a separate Gigafactory in the States (Elon said something like "we're packed to the gills in Fremont" during the last CC), but this is still very unclear. Again, it wouldn't make sense to only produce the Model Y in China and ship it around the world. The Semi will probably be either at the Giga in Nevada or at Fremont, as they don't plan more than 100k/year.
And on your point regarding 25% margin on the Model 3, I really don't see that happening, at least not without further drops in the production costs of battery packs. Short to mid term (2019) I expect 20% on all the versions combined, possibly a bit more. They can probably get the S and X to 30% though.
My experience is of a business person who has hired 30 young graduates in Spain over the past few years. The skills coming out of the universities here are very low (much less than the UK) and most of the so-called "bilingual" students can barely speak English. Couple that with the attitude that they really shouldn't work very hard (and legally people can only work a few dozen hours of overtime each year) then this would be a pretty toxic environment for Tesla to get into.
You are correct, I don't know a great deal about software engineering in Spain. I try and hire the brightest graduates from any discipline, those achieving "premios fin de carrera" and at least at 8 as a final score at university, and they say they don't even know what it is. Maybe I just have an ignorant bunch
We should be getting 5k/week sustained in late June to mid July (cautiously optimistic prediction), followed by a cost and process optimisation interval ("3 months probably, 6 months definitely") during which all the remaining versions are slowly added to production, and only after that we will see a slower ramp towards 10k/week.
I mean, it's a private company, they really don't have many controls on that type of thing. It's really a non issue, especially with the state of the cap tableAs a corporation becomes more illiquid and more financially unstable, the difference between bonds and equity narrows. The question that SpaceX directors would need to answer would be "Why did your company, primarily involved in aerospace and with no prior experience or expertise in distressed credit or junk bonds, invest substantial funds in a Caa1/B- long-term obligation? Was it because of the influence of the common controlling shareholder?"
Netherlands could work, they are pretty liberally minded and highly skilled. Wages shouldn't be any more than California although building costs could be.
I would avoid Belgium at all costs. Trade unions rule, 35 hour weeks, loads of holiday, constant strikes, 50% tax rate... very socialist country
Unfortunately, we cannot pick and choose which statement fits better with what we want to happen and go with that. I strongly believe that the 1M statement was a very optimistic extrapolation that Elon made, assuming the 'machine-that-makes-the-machine' plan is fully implemented. It would be good for the company to produce close to 1M Model 3s per year, just not all in the same place.My point is that Elon’s ‘packed to the gills’ statement is not consistent with the ‘we can do 1M cars in Fremont statement.
I disagree with this. I feel that his statement was made considering the current plans for ramping up the Model 3 are carried out. No space for additional lines. It may possibly accommodate the Semi assembly line if the battery packs and motors are produced in Nevada.My speculation is that when Elon made the ‘packed to the gills’ statement, he already had plans in his mind for the remaining space in Fremont and that those plans prevent using Fremont for the Model Y production.
Yes, there is a significant difference, and I'm not saying Fremont will never reach 1M/year production rate, just not in the next couple of years. It may happen when the S and X are updated. I doubt those two models will ever be produced anywhere else except Fremont.There is a significant difference between producing 600K cars and 1M cars in Fremont, there still must be a significant amount of space left that will be used for something.
Yes, I think it's agreed that the current line will reach a sustainable production rate somewhere between 5k and 6k/week. Ramping up to 10k/week requires doubling some sections of the line, and extra equipment for battery pack assembly.Agree with most of what you wrote, but I think we'll see an asymptotic approach to the max rate of the current line at much less than 10k followed by step changes when new equipment is added to the pinch points. (Unless Elon totally sand bagged and the current equipment will do 10k/wk on its own)
The best choice is East Europe ( Poland, Lithuania). Cheap but very hard working labor ( half compare to western Europe), 42 - 48 h week, flexy or none unions, the cheapest logistics in Europe, superb roads, has good access to the sea ports. Close to main markets: scandiniavia + good access to one of the biggest future markets ( Russia).
Speaking of which, I'm still not clear on the status of the Grohmann line. I believe it was supposed to be installed and started in April. Are they using it at the moment, or is it all the semi-automatic lines?
Switzerland should get it !!!!Poland should get it, they’re very hard working people
I mean, it's a private company, they really don't have many controls on that type of thing. It's really a non issue, especially with the state of the cap table
I thought someone said Semi will be produced at Gigafactory 1, in Nevada. But I could be misremembering.One thing puzzles me. Is anyone aware of where tesla semi will be produced? Will it be assembled in gigafactory? Or another facility?
I thought someone said Semi will be produced at Gigafactory 1, in Nevada. But I could be misremembering.