tivoboy
Active Member
They aren’t in place after hours. I think.I don't know how the short selling circuit breaker works during after-hours trading, but it's interesting to me that we're hovering right at a 10% drop.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They aren’t in place after hours. I think.I don't know how the short selling circuit breaker works during after-hours trading, but it's interesting to me that we're hovering right at a 10% drop.
Also Moses. In a different way...Exactly
My friend Ed is the same way. He's great at finding girls but can never ever seal the deal
He is a buyer, to "secure funds" you don't need to have signatures, basis promises are enough. SEC claims he had it neither.I don't know -- I feel like the SEC's point is that at the time of the tweet, nothing had in fact been secured. It's certainly impressive that he scrounged up $30b in two weeks following, but I feel like they make a solid case for nothing actually being secured at the time of the tweets and that Elon knew this.
Where do you see that?
Probably not yet. Few more years at leastPayPal is another great example...
I believe Elon has brought Tesla to the point where it will succeed with or without him.
I've just read through the complaint:
Their case looks weak to me, because it ignores the August 8-24 time period, where Elon secures funding. It ignores the presentation Silver Lake and Goldman Sachs gave to the Tesla board, where they present 30 billion dollars of funding and outline that they think the going-private transaction can be pulled off.
Here's the contemporary Wall Street Journal report:
Public Bravado, Private Doubts: Inside the Unraveling of Elon Musk’s Tesla Buyout
"By Wednesday evening, they had a presentation for Mr. Musk, proposing a roster of deep-pocketed investors, including Volkswagen and Silver Lake itself, that had agreed to contribute as much as $30 billion, people familiar with the matter said."
"Wednesday" was August 22, two weeks and one day after the tweet.
This falsifies a central claim of the SEC's lawsuit, outlined in the very beginning:
"Musk’s statements, disseminated via Twitter, falsely indicated that, should he so choose, it was virtually certain that he could take Tesla private at a purchase price that reflected a substantial premium over Tesla stock’s then-current share price, that funding for this multi-billion dollar transaction had been secured, and that the only contingency was a shareholder vote."
So Elon was virtual certain that funding was secured, and two weeks later 30 billion dollars of funding was indeed not just secured but committed as well. So Elon's belief, which the SEC claims to be false, was demonstrated to be correct within 2 weeks. The SEC has no case that I can see.
A lot of bluster in the SEC lawsuit, an ask-for-the-moon request to bar Elon from being a CEO (this could be pressure tactics to force Elon to settle), and some interesting details: it looks like the Saudis indeed offered Elon to take Tesla private a couple of days before his tweet.
BTW., a side note, the SEC lawyers writing this complaint are visibly biased in favor of shorts in the lawsuit, they describe them as 'investors', almost as victims, so it should IMO be investigated separately who leaked to shorts from the SEC: today's price action was very weird: NASDAQ rose but Tesla was shorted like there was no tomorrow.
New So SEC says it's important for a CEO not to lie
Get that idiot kicked out of TSLA already damn it
I don't think they object to that - "contingent only on a shareholder vote" is the problem, I suspect.I think the best we can do is start calling Trump and Congress and have the person at the SEC who started this removed. That can really only happen after the case is closed. Twitter is Musk's way to communicate with shareholder. Now we have to let the case play out and see if his tweets were out right lies. If they were not I am calling my congressmen since at that point it's nothing but the SEC manipulating TSLA.
We don't know what information the SEC has. It must be damning because I have never heard of a CEO getting removed/barred for making a public announcement about wanting to take their company private. Shareholders are supposed to be informed of that info. Everyone is going to conclude that the SEC has serious info that is not public.
Fidelity has no shares for shorters.I don't know how the short selling circuit breaker works during after-hours trading, but it's interesting to me that we're hovering right at a 10% drop.
If you're foolish enough to buy into the BS "case" the SEC is bringing that's your problem. Again, Elon did nothing wrong with those tweets, they are trying to railroad him.Musk ... Please for the love of god delete your goddammed twitter account and STFU.
Anyone else want to chime in on what a great communicator and media manipulator Musk is ?
Sheesh .....
Elon Musk is truly a complete jerk... Sec sueing him not without reasons and even holding a press conference. God Damnit Elon, why did you lie?? Great work
I would, but I'd have to sell TSLA to buy TSLA, which really wouldn't make much sense...Same here