That is the APC protector that resulted in a 15 million unit recall. Due to at least 700 potential fires that APC knew about. Also
discussed here.
A surge, too tiny to overwhelm protection in attached appliances, also destroyed that tiny joule protector - catastrophically. Protector part (MOV) manufacturers state that catastrophic failures must never happen. Only acceptable failure mode is degradation.
So, a surge, too tiny to harm attached electronics, almost caused a house fire. Grossly undersizing a protector (
Type 3) gets naive consumers to recommend that protector. Rather than superior circuits, inside an appliance, that are more robust.
Effective protectors remain functional for many decades after many direct lightning strikes. With specification numbers that say so. Provided by other companies known for integrity. Protector must never burn - fail catastrophically.
For same reasons, if a plug-in protector is found in your luggage, a cruise ship will probably confiscate it. They take fire threats far more seriously.
That protector did no effective protection. Adding five cent protector parts, to sell for $25 or $80, protects profit margins. Effective protectors remain functional - do not burn. Come with numbers that define protection even for direct lightning strikes. Cost about $1 per protected appliance. Must exist to protect Type 3 protectors. Nearby lightning strikes cause no changes if protection is effective.
Effective solution answer this question. Where do
hundreds of thousands of joules harmlessly dissipate? Then potential house fires do not exist. Then fans did not spin. A Tesla did not need external power to open its door. Indicators that no effective protection existed.
How many joules in that APC protector? Thousand joules is near zero protection.