zoomer0056
Active Member
Good question, I will be listen for akee's answer on that.Tessie has 96.9% battery health.. Is it possible to get that back up to 100% by following the charging guidelines suggested (the 50/55%)?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good question, I will be listen for akee's answer on that.Tessie has 96.9% battery health.. Is it possible to get that back up to 100% by following the charging guidelines suggested (the 50/55%)?
I just brought home a used 2022 LR AWD with 6,900 miles on it.. I've read this whole thread and must admit, most is over my head.. I love how users (@AAKEE ) take the time to dig into all this and share their knowledge.. So appreciate it!!
As low as possible. Which means 50% as Tesla did not give us the opportunity to set 3% as the daily… (just kidding).That being said, my daily commute is 17 miles one way to work so 34 miles give or take minimum.. Plus some running around for kids practices etc.. Setting my charge to 55% should be no issue for me as at that charge Tessie says "estimated 150 miles real world"..
Is it 55% or 50% that is the best to set at?
No. Lost capacity is forever lost. Thats how we should think. To some extent, its possible to recover capacity.Also, Tessie has 96.9% battery health.. Is it possible to get that back up to 100% by following the charging guidelines suggested (the 50/55%)? I can see myself charging it higher for the weekends and trips etc.. I'm getting a Gen3 wall charger installed right now..
Lithium ion batteries do not have any memory effect.Also, if I go with the 50/55% daily charge, is it ever suggested to charge up to 80+% for any reason? Sorry, still learning and reading a ton.. Freaking love all this data even if I don't understand it all! lol
You might see a (slight) increased range from the recovery of the battery capacity, possibly also increased range as 50-60% seems to in the end show a higher range.Good question, I will be listen for akee's answer on that.
Appreciate the reply! So is it concerning that my car which is a year old with only 7K miles is already down to 96.9% (according to Tessie)?No. Lost capacity is forever lost. Thats how we should think. To some extent, its possible to recover capacity.
After using high SOC or fast charging if the low SOC strategy is used some of the lost capacity will probably return. But not all.
I do not have a good knowledge of the recovery but in most cases it probably is not a big part of the lost capacity.
I have a Feb 2022 MSLR, 16 months old, with 10, 300 miles. Tessie says 3.8% degredation, right on the fleet average line. So it seems your vehicle is average or better than average. Side note: my car's battery degredation (per Tessie) is less today than it was a month ago. That coincides with gradually setting charge limit lower and lower from 89% to now at 55%, more details on that later. Does Tessie really know? I think (and I only know half of everything) the absolute numbers depend on who/what is making the measurements. To me, more important is trend.So is it concerning that my car which is a year old with only 7K miles is already down to 96.9% (according to Tessie)?
Most cars will loose some 5% the first year. Some more, some slightly less. Most depending on temperature (climate) and the average SOC the car has.Appreciate the reply! So is it concerning that my car which is a year old with only 7K miles is already down to 96.9% (according to Tessie)?
Tessie has got some things wrong. Some parts is good, some is nor as good.(In the furure I hope they sort these things out).I have a Feb 2022 MSLR, 16 months old, with 10, 300 miles. Tessie says 3.8% degredation, right on the fleet average line. So it seems your vehicle is average or better than average. Side note: my car's battery degredation (per Tessie) is less today than it was a month ago. That coincides with gradually setting charge limit lower and lower from 89% to now at 55%, more details on that later. Does Tessie really know? I think (and I only know half of everything) the absolute numbers depend on who/what is making the measurements. To me, more important is trend.
I will. I'm gathering data now. Stay tuned, maybe a week of more of charges. Then I'll file a report.Care to post a dump of the tesdie screen?
You maybe can post a picture of the energy screen and the SOC, like this:I will. I'm gathering data now. Stay tuned, maybe a week of more of charges. Then I'll file a report.
Absolutely!! Just please tell me exactly where to find them. Thanks!Most cars will loose some 5% the first year. Some more, some slightly less. Most depending on temperature (climate) and the average SOC the car has.
97% capacity after one year is very good.
I would guess that Tessie possibly set a too low initial capacity, which shows a little understated degradation (usually, it’s lika that).
Care to post a screen dump of the ”available capacity” and the initial, inside the meter?
I dont have Tessie, but there is a screen with a meeter with a kWh number inside, and a kWh number for ”available capacity”.Absolutely!! Just please tell me exactly where to find them. Thanks!
This is the one @AAKEE is referring to. You can find it my going to Battery, then tapping the Health icon:I dont have Tessie, but there is a screen with a meeter with a kWh number inside, and a kWh number for ”available capacity”.
@AAKEE , see Battery Degredation Lessens With Lower SOCTessie has got some things wrong. Some parts is good, some is nor as good.(In the furure I hope they sort these things out).
Care to post a dump of the tesdie screen?
Here you go. Thanks!View attachment 945813View attachment 945814I dont have Tessie, but there is a screen with a meeter with a kWh number inside, and a kWh number for ”available capacity”.
Thanks!