You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what is your source of data for the "fact"Yep, the flooding is getting worse, thanks to global warming
denying reality when it does not conform to one's personal biases is something humans are very good at.
Point taken. Reality is difficult for some people to deal with. In this case, the data is the reality.I have no clue about your "knowledge of the psychology" of the global warming hoax
hardly reality, for every so called climate alarmist "expert" you can refer to, there is another "expert" ready to refute their claims. the only hard fact is that there are no real facts, just conjecture and opinions.Point taken. Reality is difficult for some people to deal with. In this case, the data is the reality.
His statement is factually correct.what is your source of data for the "fact"
his statement referred to flooding, there is no sharp increase in any flooding in FLA.His statement is factually correct.
The sea level has been rising (are you arguing this point?).
The rising sea level is due to warming of the ocean (are you arguing this point?).
He never said it is or isn't anthropogenic. But the evidence on this one leans very heavily one way vs. the other. I won't waste my breath on this topic.
I'm not sure what your point is.his statement referred to flooding.
my point is that you rose to defend his statement with a misstatement.I'm not sure what your point is.
I see you later added this comment, and I googled, and apparently you're right -- Florida Disaster - The website for Florida disasters online - FloridaDisaster.com (assuming this site has accurate facts). It's about a flood every 3-4 years consistently over the last 40 years.there is no sharp increase in any flooding in FLA.
I appreciate your ability to get the facts and admit that your comment wasn't accurate.I see you later added this comment, and I googled, and apparently you're right -- Florida Disaster - The website for Florida disasters online - FloridaDisaster.com (assuming this site has accurate facts). It's about a flood every 3-4 years consistently over the last 40 years.
You may want to look into "sunny day" or tidal flooding in coastal areas. Those have increased in frequency. A 2016 UM (Miami) study noted a consistent increase over the last decade.I see you later added this comment, and I googled, and apparently you're right -- Florida Disaster - The website for Florida disasters online - FloridaDisaster.com (assuming this site has accurate facts). It's about a flood every 3-4 years consistently over the last 40 years.
...The perineal problem of the USA is how to reconcile the people of the paragraph above with the traditionally well-educated 'eastern' people. ...
I had this same opinion until recently. A decade ago, this was true - we didn't have good scientific attribution methodologies. However, that has rapidly evolved. Today, the science is pretty reliable for extreme event attribution. A search for that term will turn up a lot of results showing how far we've come in recent years, especially from 2014-present.Even being a believer in climate change, I have a (very) hard time assigning a specific event or events to be the effect of climate change. Convincing people who aren't "sure" is an exceptionally difficult thing to do.
I get irritated when people look at every weather anomaly and assign it to climate change. That hurts the credibility of the entire argument. It's a bit like crying wolf.
Good grief! I have little excuse for failing to spell-check my spell-checker. My best excuse is that I am a legal resident and registered voter in a city surrounded by Miami, thus I probably don't think the sea level is rising because I cannot read the century-long data in that area. Also most of my plants flower every years so I need not plant them anew. Much like that the problems we have described in this thread have been with us a long, long time and probably will remain with us.Oh, and by the way - there you go again. We need to adjust your spell-check.....
Are you an atheist?I have no clue about your "knowledge of the psychology" of the global warming hoax but I do know that you squat about florida
So when Democrats are in control, they use a bipartisan commission and try to draw fair district lines, but when Republicans are in control they try to gerrymander as much as possible in their favour?
That seems like a losing strategy for Democrats. They should draw lines that favour Democrats as much as possible and hope for someone / something (SCOTUS?) to somehow end gerrymandering once and for all.
Actually California is an outlier, as it always is. As partial proof of that, I was born there. When Democrats have been in less strong positions than are those of California they have chosen gerrymandering also. Factually, politicians normally act to perpetuate themselves. They are the perfect illustration of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs; survival comes before all else!
Yep, the flooding is getting worse, thanks to global warming
So Republicans (conservatives) are less educated?
Huge polling research (Vote Compass) found the same thing in Australia