You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's a little concerning that once again unforeseen production challenges are the culprit. !
Agree with all that... I still wouldn't mind if Elon didn't announce "ludicrous" delivery goals every year, just would be OK with "insane".
so what does a delivery miss bode for the quarter EPS?
Ford to develop several Tesla killers over the next 5 years. At least I'm sure that's what the bears are thinking...
Ford Adding Electrified F-150, Mustang, Transit by 2020 in Major EV Push; Expanded U.S. Plant to Add 700 Jobs to Make EVs, Autonomous Cars | Ford Media Center
On Oct 26th, Tesla said they would hit 50k for the second half after doing 24,821 in Q3, or 25,179 for Q4.
That is almost 3k worth of "production problems" that then happened in November and December.
Spiegel predicted 18500 deliveries, or about 20% below actuals. I think he should just STFU for now.Edit: And another bigger problem with this is Mark Spiegel now will rant with even more panache for one more quarter. I bet that guy murders Elon every night in his dreams
Building the most-expensive cars near the end of a quarter (ie. P90DL in end of Q2, P100D end of Q4) can be used to borrow for a period of time against the ABL. A built expensive car is worth more than the sum of its parts. Then they can be sold in the following quarter at discountable prices after miles are drawn against the car and written down in terms of mileage allowances by the IRS. Let's see how the ABL looks at the end of Q4 on the Earnings Report. It can be paid back in January - but is a tactical CFO maneuver to build inventory for a short period and make the customers who are paying full price wait a little longer (ie. cars "in transit").
I think the biggest problem with this is the loss of confidence in Elon's words from now on. TSLA affirmed the H2 50k guidance on Oct. 26th Q3 call. So is it just coincidental that production probs occurred only after that call?
Basically, even if TSLA says they will deliver 120k -130k S&X in 2017, I'm going to stick with 110k (assuming about a 50% increase from actual numbers, just like 2015 to 2016).
The biggest impact I fear is market not trusting the M3 timeline as well now, even if TSLA management continues to affirm till Q2 2017. That takes away one major catalyst for the SP.
Edit: And another bigger problem with this is Mark Spiegel now will rant with even more panache for one more quarter. I bet that guy murders Elon every night in his dreams
To quote Tesla: Tesla vehicle deliveries represent only one measure of the company's financial performance and should not be relied on as an indicator of quarterly financial results, which depend on a variety of factors, including the cost of sales, foreign exchange movements and mix of directly leased vehicles.
Q4 deliveries in context:
On Oct 26th, Tesla said they would hit 50k for the second half after doing 24,821 in Q3, or 25,179 for Q4.
That is almost 3k worth of "production problems" that then happened in November and December.
I think the biggest problem with this is the loss of confidence in Elon's words from now on.
So, I can't see Q1 deliveries overall being much more than 21,000. Model S should be staying strong but without the USA sales of September as they were (lease deals and discounts on P90DL) they fell back again in Q4.
However, the delay in AP2 HW production and the AP2 SW catch-up to AP1 capability are both disconcerting. Tesla needs to demonstrate that they can roll out new features and products on a reliable schedule, otherwise people will always question how these delays could impact M3 ramp.