Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

2021 Model 3 and differences from 2020

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
While I didn't hate the piano black console, I ended up spending $40 for a matte console wrap which takes care of the issue completely and looks great. Seems hardly necessary to go to 2021 just to get rid of the piano black console...
Well he did say he was insane ;)
The new console is definitely more practical and I really like the wireless phone chargers. But I'm not overly impressed with the choice of plastic finish. It looks and feels a bit cheap and I suspect it would easily get scratched/chipped if you actually used the cup holders. Not a big deal, maybe third time lucky if they have another attempt?
 
V16 was certified on the 1st of March:
v16_Reasons for Change.jpg
v16_Table.jpg
 
This means that EU is getting new motors on next delivery? About may-june.
Yes, I believe in April we will see the release of the Long Range with the 82kwh pack and new rear motor. Deliverys in May and June.

Would be interesting if someone with more knowledge would explain the benefits of the new motor design. The motors have the same power rating by the way, so don't expect some ludicrous new Performance model.

In the end it's not a question of IF, but WHEN!
 

Attachments

  • c80a42184fd8a9b691b31be1f9ada59493e28f4f_2_1034x374.jpeg
    c80a42184fd8a9b691b31be1f9ada59493e28f4f_2_1034x374.jpeg
    49.4 KB · Views: 151
  • 7371667f370b5febc2192d1e2edda1663220c0ef_2_1034x138.jpeg
    7371667f370b5febc2192d1e2edda1663220c0ef_2_1034x138.jpeg
    16.3 KB · Views: 143
  • 777e9f7587f6508b8496a6a5209f973eb6d41268.jpeg
    777e9f7587f6508b8496a6a5209f973eb6d41268.jpeg
    24.4 KB · Views: 136
  • 79ec231558c6fc4793559ab7ac565bd879712409_2_1034x186.jpeg
    79ec231558c6fc4793559ab7ac565bd879712409_2_1034x186.jpeg
    27.6 KB · Views: 132
  • c0ca8c82d5957de756d246df7800ddb1fde2dde1_2_1034x90.jpeg
    c0ca8c82d5957de756d246df7800ddb1fde2dde1_2_1034x90.jpeg
    14 KB · Views: 113
  • b31283eeec51b2b6e13acd379f886260fd020fd3_2_1034x108.jpeg
    b31283eeec51b2b6e13acd379f886260fd020fd3_2_1034x108.jpeg
    18.7 KB · Views: 109
  • 644d01dc8b254e63b6355efb0322797d0ebc89b7_2_1034x248.jpeg
    644d01dc8b254e63b6355efb0322797d0ebc89b7_2_1034x248.jpeg
    28.8 KB · Views: 103
  • 511b568035098369382da4eac8383e37f8b1412a_2_1034x86.jpeg
    511b568035098369382da4eac8383e37f8b1412a_2_1034x86.jpeg
    16.8 KB · Views: 104
  • Like
Reactions: TomaGo
Yes, I believe in April we will see the release of the Long Range with the 82kwh pack and new rear motor. Deliverys in May and June.

Would be interesting if someone with more knowledge would explain the benefits of the new motor design. The motors have the same power rating by the way, so don't expect some ludicrous new Performance model.

In the end it's not a question of IF, but WHEN!
Should this also affect Performance? That is usually getting first these changes. Or is that already new motor?
 
Maybe it's just me but I'm having a difficult time deciphering the above table. Can someone explain or break-down what Table 1 above means? How can you tell Long Range vs. Performance from the information on the table? Also, there are 2 SR and 2 LR that show Panasonic 2170 C or L. What does this mean? Also, is this in effect now or sometime in the future? I apologize if I'm the only one that doesn't get it.
 
It only means that all of these options are validated to be delivered to customers. It does not mean that actual cars will be delivered with those combinations. Tesla is able to do so legally if they so decide.

But the table tell that LR-version can be delivered with all bigger battery variant including 82kWh Panasonic battery and Performance can be delivered with all variants including 75kWh LG battery. SR can be delivered with new Panasonic battery chemistry or old one or CATL Chemistry. It does not mean these combinations will be delivered or produced by Tesla. Only that those combinations have certified for EU deliveries.
 
This morning US models appear to have gotten new door panel inserts, as well as updated center console colors.


Tim
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: JohnnyEV
This morning US models appear to have gotten new door panel inserts, as well as updated center console colors.


Tim
As well as another $500 increase.
 
My understanding is the the refreshed Model 3 comes with regenerative braking now locked at only the highest level and there is no option to reduce it to a lower setting like the original Model 3?

My M3P lease is up in a year, and I was considering an outright purchase of a new M3P because of the improved heat pump, sound insulation, but I live in an area with regular ice on the roads during the winter and I noticed the high level of regenerative braking makes the cars unstable, while the low level does not.

If Tesla really has taken away that choice between high and low regenerative braking with the new Model 3, then I will just have to buy my old car when the lease is up.

Another know the story on that? Particularly if it is impossible to switch regen braking to low setting on the newest model 3 refresh?
 
My understanding is the the refreshed Model 3 comes with regenerative braking now locked at only the highest level and there is no option to reduce it to a lower setting like the original Model 3?

Exactly, with refresh model no choice to switch between "low" / "high 'regenerative braking.
But i would like to say that regenerative braking standard level (highest) on a 2019 LR seems to be stronger than on a M3P 2021 with no option - I am driving these 2 cars at the moment alternatively - and so, impossible to say how many, but I notice that the decrease in speed due to regenerative braking is lower on 2021 M3P.
 
I think this is just a temperature thing. I drove both 2019 LR and 2021 and didn't see a difference.

And I can confirm that on slippery road and downhill with snow low regen is better. But Tesla cares more about EPA range in the city in California than safety, unfortunately.
To all these people complaining about not having low regen: have you not been able to figure out how to use the accelerator in a way that "coasts"? You can position your foot in the right position to where the car is not accelerating or decelerating. It's not that hard imo and you can look at the green and black bar to figure out at what point you aren't producing or using energy.
 
Yeah, except that on a slope, especially in the snow, you don't want to coast, you want to break with the engine like you would do shifting down. And with high regen it is very hard to gradually do it. Trust me, it is very, very hard. And the minute you switch to low regen you gain control.

Even Bjørn Nyland complained about it. It is a very dangerous situation.

I am pretty sure you can fix that with software by giving less regen on slopes and slippery conditions, but these guys in California probably have never driven in snow to begin with. So giving us low regen option is the best thing.

But like I said, since the EPA will use it, as it is an option in the car, this will probably cut down the range by a few miles. And Tesla is more concerned about winning the EPA game.

Which in turn results to idiots like the Edmunds people "debunking" the EPA range, thus nullifying Tesla's advantage, and we are back at square 1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sbax