Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register
This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Nope, no poke. What you see below is 18x9.5 +22 GTX01 with OEM performance rotors and 265/40/18 NT01's. Out of anything that I do, wheel and tire setup is my forte' and has been for the last 30 years. Keep in mind NT01's have bulgy sidewalls also. A normal street radial won't be like this.

I also have only -1.0 camber front and -0.6 rear. This was before I had front FUCA's so I reduced camber in the rear to be less than the front for more rotation. Plenty of guys have run this setup with street radials.


View attachment 775113View attachment 775114

Are those wheels black or mag blue? Is this your car?
 
Someone's poke could some someone else's tuck. Just different views. :)
I always understood poke to mean an object that is protruding past another. In this case, the tire is not protruding past the fender. It is flush with the fender. Under compression it tucks under as well. I would hate for your definition of poke to mislead others. That's why I posted the picture so that people can understand how I define "flush."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Theraven and GAGT
Nope, no poke. What you see below is 18x9.5 +22 GTX01 with OEM performance rotors and 265/40/18 NT01's. Out of anything that I do, wheel and tire setup is my forte' and has been for the last 30 years. Keep in mind NT01's have bulgy sidewalls also. A normal street radial won't be like this.

I also have only -1.0 camber front and -0.6 rear. This was before I had front FUCA's so I reduced camber in the rear to be less than the front for more rotation. Plenty of guys have run this setup with street radials.


View attachment 775113View attachment 775114
Definitely buying my next set of wheels through you. Your fitment is awesome on multiple setups.
 
Yup that looks fire 🔥 glad cause I have 9.5 +22 ready to install
If you have PUP brakes you “might” be ok based on drop and tire sidewall but on a non Pup it will rub. Be prepared to buy a fuca. You will also have wheel poke.

9AD171F5-FF84-4A59-A204-8BC56DE0DC4B.jpeg
 
I’ll get camber arms if I end up needing them. That spec has been used many times now.
 

Attachments

  • ADD3EBF8-46DD-497B-BF43-B4964DEFAE80.jpeg
    ADD3EBF8-46DD-497B-BF43-B4964DEFAE80.jpeg
    781.3 KB · Views: 361
  • A92ABC92-0364-4B54-9537-A3C26CBB216B.jpeg
    A92ABC92-0364-4B54-9537-A3C26CBB216B.jpeg
    455.2 KB · Views: 301
  • A5AB3363-557F-4657-BF49-6CD40A724D65.jpeg
    A5AB3363-557F-4657-BF49-6CD40A724D65.jpeg
    418.7 KB · Views: 319
  • E56664C2-B11E-4E5F-9692-4837BFFEC88A.jpeg
    E56664C2-B11E-4E5F-9692-4837BFFEC88A.jpeg
    739.5 KB · Views: 326
  • 6F0E5384-CCC1-40B4-87D0-14FDCC19A003.jpeg
    6F0E5384-CCC1-40B4-87D0-14FDCC19A003.jpeg
    636.8 KB · Views: 469
I always understood poke to mean an object that is protruding past another. In this case, the tire is not protruding past the fender. It is flush with the fender. Under compression it tucks under as well. I would hate for your definition of poke to mislead others. That's why I posted the picture so that people can understand how I define "flush."
Must have camber and/or lowered.
 
I’ll get camber arms if I end up needing them. That spec has been used many times now.
Anything “can” fit. You can run 10.5 up front with 275 tires and 3.5 degree of negative camber. Will 99% of members do it? No not really. I’m just stating that for the majority of members that want a different wheel. If you are buying wheels that are not going to fit naturally it needs to be stated that you added additional components to make it fit. A blanket statement of “it fits” isn’t going to bode well for members that weren’t planning on adding more cost to the car.
 
Vossen HF-5 Gunmetal 20x9-20x10.5
These are also for sale if anybody is interested in SoCal!

Looking for TE’s!☺️
 

Attachments

  • A23F7E69-6BB7-4F82-A1B1-DBA2FF4A73E8.jpeg
    A23F7E69-6BB7-4F82-A1B1-DBA2FF4A73E8.jpeg
    896.6 KB · Views: 454
  • CC06745E-FF69-4B0F-A9B8-8BFDDF79DADF.jpeg
    CC06745E-FF69-4B0F-A9B8-8BFDDF79DADF.jpeg
    654.6 KB · Views: 442
  • AACDE8F6-F832-4933-BA90-1E7180FC065A.jpeg
    AACDE8F6-F832-4933-BA90-1E7180FC065A.jpeg
    575.7 KB · Views: 408
  • Like
Reactions: Lindenwood
This is probably my favorite Konig design. 18x9.5 +35 with the concave "B face" and clears the red caliper P3D brakes from what Konig told me.

Under $1100 is a steel for something that looks this good imo. They should be around 20lbs each. I'll try to weigh one before I put tires on. You can see them on my friend's blue TM3 below. I already got some RS4's on hand 275/40/18 as well as some hubcentric 5mm spacers for additional room on my P3D to the upright. I know it's a tight fit with 275's without them.

View attachment 669083
View attachment 669087
that right there is the bargain of the century... is that the 18x9.5 +35 wheel?

this one? AM98514356B,18×9.5B,5×114.3,35,DARK METALLIC GRAPHITE,73.1,FLOW FORMED,projected 19.50
 
  • Like
Reactions: Theraven
Yeah, looks great! Also curious what your wh/mi ends up with these. Martian only lists these MW03's in 18x8.5, +35 on their website. Do they do custom?
Martian no longer has them listed on the site, but has some sets still available. Their take is that 9.5 width was wider than range chasers wanted, but not wide enough for ultimate track builds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ss71