2022.20.8 seems to have completly removed the energy graph even by voice command.
Not sure I understand why all of the sudden the Energy App has become a big secret!!! It's a very informative app to use.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2022.20.8 seems to have completly removed the energy graph even by voice command.
I think they know of it, or some other bug related to 2022.24.5 because I had it available to install and I didn't install it but then it went away and gave me the option to install 2022.20.8 instead.
I'm still holding strong in my 2021.44.6 since I haven't heard of a solid release since then yet. 2022.24 finally got defroster on the main bar, 2022.20.8 seems to have completely removed the energy graph even by voice command. I think at this rate I'll be holding out till v12.
Thank you for the clarification, it's hard to tell what model/year people are talking about sometimes when they dont list them in their signature. I had assumed it was all vehicles, but that makes sense with the vertical screens.The Energy Graph is only missing on Palladium S and X'. All "Legacy" vehicles still have the Energy Graph on all firmware versions, just as @Huachipato mentioned.
The Energy Graph is only missing on Palladium S and X'. All "Legacy" vehicles still have the Energy Graph on all firmware versions, just as @Huachipato mentioned. The problem was that ...
This thread is about AP1 cars. There really should be no confusion.
Agreed, but this thread isn't as active as other thread especially when it comes to new firmware releases so you need to gather information from other threads and then bring that information here to see what other AP1 users have experienced.This thread is about AP1 cars. There really should be no confusion.
AP1 car is now on V11, 2022.8.10.1 not only is the graph there, but can be added to the new tool bar.I used the energy screen just a couple days ago. I'm on version 2022.24.5.
since you are on V11, any thoughts about the addition of Tidal? I signed up for it, does not seem to have any advantage over TuneIn or spotify.Release notes look the exact same as 2022.8.10.1, as expected.
Yes, the estimates are MUCH closer to reality on my 85. Fairly spot on unless the battery is cold.Question to "nerfed" SuC 85 owners (most of 85 owners, I guess): I noticed that charge duration estimates in the Nav seem adapted to the slower SuC speed.
For a long time, and definitely during our last road trip in February, it would still estimate charge stops time, as if the car was still able to charge before the infamous nerfing. So always way too optimistic.
Now, I see very long charge time announced (50' & 1h10'), when planning a long trip. Not sure though if it is close to reality, but looks like it is.
Anyone here also noticed this?
Anyone still getting this? Even after updating to 2022.24.8 and rebooting, I have to close the backup camera window in order to look at songs in the playlists or else it will collapse back down automatically and immediately.Anyone on MCU2 see a glitch after updating to 2022.24.5 where the top window can’t be dragged and set further up on the screen to expand out music options on the bottom of the screen? When I let go of it the bottom immediately collapses. I have to close the top window to access the playlist.
I have updated to 2022.24.8 (unfortunately). If I have the backup camera open I can view the music in the small window (about 2 inches tall), and the medium window (about 5 inches tall) but if I try to make it the largest size it will close the rear camera. Pushing the button to resize the window it toggles between the small and medium sizes and never enables the largest size music window with the camera up.Anyone still getting this? Even after updating to 2022.24.8 and rebooting, I have to close the backup camera window in order to look at songs in the playlists or else it will collapse back down automatically and immediately.
Last month, 6k road trip. SuC charge time estimate way off as usual.Question to "nerfed" SuC 85 owners (most of 85 owners, I guess): I noticed that charge duration estimates in the Nav seem adapted to the slower SuC speed.
For a long time, and definitely during our last road trip in February, it would still estimate charge stops time, as if the car was still able to charge before the infamous nerfing. So always way too optimistic.
Now, I see very long charge time announced (50' & 1h10'), when planning a long trip. Not sure though if it is close to reality, but looks like it is.
Anyone here also noticed this?
Thanks for the detailed report.Last month, 6k road trip. SuC charge time estimate way off as usual.
Updated to 2020.8.10.5 last night.
Navigate to a 250kw SuC, pulled in as soon as SMT showed pack heater off at a cell temp of about 102 deg F.
Charging rate higher a bit than BMS limit shown on SMT. Saw 96Kw at 30% SoC.
Charging rate + SoC seemed a bit higher, 116 at 30%, to 112 at 70% SoC.
Charge time shown has greater precision, showing second digit as other than zero or 5, such as 18, 12, 8 minutes remaining.
Set timer when it said 20min to completion. Timer said 26 min when car said calculating, 26.5 min to complete...
Just saw you also replied. As mentioned above, seems not all good for me anyway.Yes, the estimates are MUCH closer to reality on my 85. Fairly spot on unless the battery is cold.