Dude, that's not a productive attitude. Some serve in jobs where there's no need for deployment, others simply were in during a stretch where their unit didn't deploy — especially nowadays when deployments are far fewer than in previous years. The "If your ain't deployed then you ain't s***" attitude doesn't help develop an effective or cohesive fighting force. It puts all the emphasis on the glory of the patch than on service to your country and comrades.
Sorry for my attitude, but it was carefully honed over many years of watching soldiers in units figure out ways to get out of deploying: school, mental, physical, family, pregnancy, EFMP, drug abuse, insubordination, sudden injuries, etc, it left a bad taste in my mouth.
Looks like the military is getting sick of it too. It's not effective or cohesive. Maybe the non-deployables could be aligned to the stateside jobs, so soldiers like you can deploy.
Deploy or get out: New Pentagon plan could boot thousands of non-deployable troops
The Army National Guard wants to cut down on non-deployables, increase quality of training
BTW Thank you for your service. I don't know what you do and it doesn't really matter, as long as you served.
From the 2018 Guard Posture Statement:
After 9/11, our National Guard began its transition to the operational force it is today. Since then,
Guard members have deployed more than 850,000 times to locations such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, the Balkans, Guantanamo Bay,and the Sinai. Today, we are an operational force that fights seamlessly with the joint force. With the implementation of Total Force initiatives with the Army and Air Force, we are more closely integrated than ever before.
http://www.nationalguard.mil/portal...8-National-Guard-Bureau-Posture-Statement.pdf