I will start with saying two things:
1) -90% is OK. Your battery will survive, so no problems. But it won’t have the lowest degradation.
2) -You will struggle really,really hard to find *any* evidence that 80 or 90% is the best SOC for the longevity of the battery. I have tried this myself, to try to shoot the things I learned down from a lot of research by trying to find something that shows that its wrong. Just to be sure. The only thing on that side of the coin is myths with no data to back it up.
I do not base my statements on a opinion.
I read the research and I follow and learn the sum of all research that builds the case.
There is no single test data that show something very important. They do this together. And the data is so solid that I could calculate your cars degradation/displayed range if I get some numbers.
This is Tesla model S cells ripped lut of a 6 months old car (2017, I think):
If we take this data and put it in the other calendar aging charts, it matches very well.
20% and 50% SOC show even less degradation than the regular calendar aging charts does. There is s very probable explanation. If cells have been used at higher SOC, after lowering the SOC and leaving them there, or cycling them at low SOC they show a recovery effect where lithium restorts from lithium plating to cycleble lithium.
We should not think that 20% SOC will give exactly zero, it would have been just like any other chart if the car had’nt been used with 70-90% SOC or so.
View attachment 939317
Note that 100% show lower degradation than 80%. About 2/3 of the research reports show that 80% is about the worst SOC for calendar aging and that 100% might be less bad. Note that not all research show this, in some its about the same 70-100% and in some 100% is slightly worse, specially att higher temperatures.
Heres the two step cyclic degradation test:
View attachment 939318
Data from this research report