You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, extremism (in any form) is a mental disorder, since it involves denial of reality, massive conformation bias, and cherry picking of data (or generation of fake data) to support a dubious and/or untenable position.After the extermination part, that should be living proof that liberalism is a mental disorder!
Didn't you say that you wanted to exterminate the poor?After the extermination part, that should be living proof that liberalism is a mental disorder!
So, is that health care facility owned by poor people? You democrat-socialists are oblivious to the fact that wealthier nations are much more capable to clean up their environment than poor nations. Many of the poor are still burning wood for their energy source. I get that many of you want to keep it that way.From an environmental standpoint, the rich in the world are the main problem. If you ignore the environment, they are less bad. Still bad mind you but less so.
At some point in an interconnected world, excess use of a limited resource creates a burden to the poor even when you ignore the environment.
If you can't stand back and see that, then you are missing a good part of the picture. Doesn't make rich people "bad" of course, but their power to do things usually creates a problem for some people. There really isn't any great solution for it but you should acknowledge that is an issue.
I work in health care. My employer (like most) is a non-profit. It is not owned by rich people. There are lots of government dollars and lots of health insurance dollars. Most of my patients are what you might call poor - because truly rich people tend to have less medical issues. But we should probably clarify what poor is - which is very few people in the US.
So how does that fit? - I am not employed by a rich person. In fact, I don't work nearly as much for rich people. And my sector is just over 13% of the US workforce.
No. Your buddy said that.Didn't you say that you wanted to exterminate the poor?
Then why don't you step up and lead by example!Saving the future for our children by not having them? Nay. The answer is death.
Because for me, the job of killing people just doesn’t seem like a good fit.Then why don't you step up and lead by example!
The latest data is showing that the earth is cooling off. The global mean temperature is the same as it was all the way back to 1980!Given that the human industrial era is less than 10% of that period, and that human activity is increasing, recent data should have the strongest signals of any impact.
It's similar to the way using 2016 UK coal usage data to describe its level of coal use is omitting a significant time period.
Well, you sure seem to be an advocate for it.Because for me, the job of killing people just doesn’t seem like a good fit.
Advocating for the extermination of a species, based on a flimsy theory about a greenhouse gas, is a mental disorder of the highest magnitude.No, extremism (in any form) is a mental disorder, since it involves denial of reality, massive conformation bias, and cherry picking of data (or generation of fake data) to support a dubious and/or untenable position.
Fox reports. You decide.People believe what they believe because they want to believe it. Fox News just parrots what they already believe.
This is what the "sanctuary city" idea that started in California has sprung. If you are going to defy the Feds by hiding illegal aliens, then you can defy the Feds by protecting the petrochemical industry as well.But McCormick, a Republican, introduced a bill at the Louisiana capitol last week that would protect oil companies and not residents in his district who have to breathe in that air. The bill would establish Louisiana as a “fossil fuel sanctuary state” and ban local and state employees from enforcing federal laws and regulations that negatively impact petrochemical companies.Bill seeks to make Louisiana ‘fossil fuel sanctuary’ in bid against Biden’s climate plans
Republicans and Democrats are introducing bills to push against Biden’s new restrictions on oil and gas companieswww.theguardian.com
I think you missed the point.This is what the "sanctuary city" idea that started in California has sprung. If you are going to defy the Feds by hiding illegal aliens, then you can defy the Feds by protecting the petrochemical industry as well.
One protects people, the other kills them. See the difference?If California is going to have their illegal alien sanctuary, Louisiana will have their fossil fuel sanctuary.
The latest data is showing that the earth is cooling off. The global mean temperature is the same as it was all the way back to 1980!
Fox reports. You decide.
So, being so fair and balanced, did FAUX NEWS cover PIZZA GAETZ?
Ive decided. They are full of *sugar*.Fox reports. You decide.