Ostrichsak
Well-Known Member
In my case the car was 100% driveable and the damage was superficial, cosmetic and barely noticeable. No rental required but I do recall them saying that it would adhere to whatever rental coverage I paid for with my policy if I went that route. That being said, it was probably pretty minimal as I tend to self-insure as much as possible and don't do extended warranty or put much value in "peace of mind" as the next person. I'd rather hold onto my own money and pay out-of-pocket should the need ever arise. I've done this long enough across all items that I own that I've saved a boat load of money over the decades and having to cover something out-of-pocket wouldn't be a big deal now. Not to mention it gives you new perspective on how how much most people waste on insurance & warranties they probably don't need.Are you able to share - what was the timeline of repairs, and did your company offer a rental during that time? My company (Farmers) explicitly said they would not subrogate rental costs, and any rental would have to be part of the rental coverage I have on my policy. If other companies operate similarly, this might a case where rates increased - the subrogation didn't count as the claim that switched the actuarial tables used for underwriting, but rental reimbursement did.
tl;dr No rental. lol