TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Cost comparison

Discussion in 'Model S: Driving Dynamics' started by Patrick W, Aug 11, 2015.

  1. Patrick W

    Patrick W Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    847
    Location:
    SLC, UT
    #1 Patrick W, Aug 11, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2015
    I'm trying to compare the cost of "fuel" to drive my S vs my ICE. Anyone here care to check my figures?

    My ICE gets 27 MPG.

    Gasoline currently costs $2.96 per gallon (a bargain compared to the rest of the world).

    The display on my S says I have driven 4,090 miles since resetting the counter and that during that time I used 1,136 kwh.

    With electricity currently costing $0.088854 per kwh I spent $100.93 to power the S.

    If I had driven the same distance in my ICE I would have burned 151.5 gallons of gasoline costing $448.40.

    So about $101 in "fuel" for the S and about $450 in fuel for the ICE.

    Does that look right?

    Thanks!
     
  2. stevezzzz

    stevezzzz R;SigS;P85D;SigX

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    6,062
    Location:
    Colorado
    Seems right, and in line with other comparisons I've seen.
     
  3. deonb

    deonb Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    3,020
    Location:
    Redmond, WA
    Unless you've measured the 1136 kWh at the wall, your numbers are probably a little light.

    Your actual usage was likely around 15% higher than that (so 1306 kWh), due to charging losses and vampire drain.

    That would mean $116 instead of $101.

    Not a huge difference though.
     
  4. tstafford

    tstafford Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    Messages:
    790
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Side note - You sure have cheap electricity in UT.
     
  5. JPP

    JPP Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,845
    Location:
    SF Bay area, CA
    In the SF Bay area, my cheap night rate on a tiered EV plan is $0.11/kw. You don't want to know what the peak rate is.....
     
  6. brucet999

    brucet999 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    1,316
    Location:
    Huntington Beach, CA
    You used about 8% - 10% more AC electricity than the battery received in DC. Did you measure kWh usage at a dedicated power meter, or calculate from battery metrics?
     
  7. Patrick W

    Patrick W Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    847
    Location:
    SLC, UT
    Ah, had not thought of that. But even with that I'm guessing I actually spent well under $100 as a lot of what I used came from super chargers.
     
  8. sorka

    sorka Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2015
    Messages:
    3,269
    Location:
    Merced, CA
    In 8K miles of driving, I've only charged about 1/3 of the miles at home. The rest was at work and at superchargers. I put 1600 miles alone last weekend and all but 200 miles of it was on super chargers.
     
  9. Patrick W

    Patrick W Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    847
    Location:
    SLC, UT
    Nothing that fancy. Just used the energy usage shown in the Trip Menu.

    But no matter how it's calculated it's pretty obvious electrons are cheaper than carbon.
     
  10. BoerumHill

    BoerumHill Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    608
    Location:
    New York, NY
  11. deonb

    deonb Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    3,020
    Location:
    Redmond, WA
    Markup vs. markdown effect.

    18% loss in efficiency, marked up becomes 22% "higher than expected".
     
  12. BoerumHill

    BoerumHill Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    608
    Location:
    New York, NY
    Bingo! Great point, makes perfect sense when you run the numbers. His efficiency was 81.4%; consumption was 728, actual meter usage was 894. But if you extrapolated the cost (I know he paid $0.24 per other blog posts, no TOU plan available in MA), the consumption appears to have cost $174.72 when in fact it was $214.56, or 22.8% higher.
     
  13. deonb

    deonb Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    3,020
    Location:
    Redmond, WA
    Or put another way, 100 / 81.4 = 122.8% :)
     

Share This Page