Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Demand

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Yep, the weekend test drive--real time use with the windshield, having it in the garage (trying the FWDs in the garage), seeing the ease the kids get in and out of the X--was key to convert this fence sitter to a buyer. Tesla still needs inventory vehicles in their fleet.

Yeah - the "will it fit in the garage" test. It turns out that it does, but we decided to name it "Hugo". Because "Humongous" is just too long to say all the time :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoTslaGo
Model S, which has just started it's 6th year of deliveries, has not followed that pattern. However in order to keep demand from faltering Tesla has used battery variant changes, price tweaks, etc. to induce demand that would otherwise not be there in the normal pattern we see in models from Mercedes, BMW and others.

And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that (well, we can discuss Tesla's constant, multi-times a quarter change policy as a different question in other threads). Nothing wrong with that from a demand perspective, it is normal that models lose demand over time.

I am merely of the opinion Tesla is not production constrained on Model S/X anymore and despite of facelift(s) in 2016 and ramping up the still-new Model X, that seems to remain the case in 2017. I do agree they used to be production costrained in around 2013-2015.
 
More b.s. If you check the Model S spreadsheet from last quarter the latest confirm date that was delivered within the quarter was June 7th. For Q1 it was March 10th.
Oh yes, I have seen turnaround times of 10 days near quarter ends. The spreadsheets don't capture all deliveries.
For someone who follows Tesla so closely, you conveniently overlook pertinent facts. Elon has stated in multiple conference calls that the S+X final assembly line is capable of producing approximately 25K cars/quarter. Tesla uses pricing, feature changes, etc. to match demand to that production ceiling. If they could produce 30K S+X, I'm sure they would find other incentives to generate demand for 30K S+X per quarter.

Now, this is bs, or you are repeating someone else's bs. Is Tesla running 3 shifts? Didn't Tesla also report 2400(or 2200) cars produced in a week? At that rate,it can produce 31200/28600 in 13 weeks. This may not be the most optimal setup, but 25k is definitely not the limit. When the line is running 24 hours, 7 days a week at its max speed, that is the limit.

But I see that you agreed in essence, that Tesla is matching production to demand. If Tesla thought it could sell more S&X easily, wouldn't it be pulling more production levers instead of demand levers? Think about it, and let us know what production levers Tesla has pulled in the last many quarters.

PS: Elon's statements are not always facts. AP2 due in Dec'16 is still less than AP 1.0. He has said many incorrect things.
 
I don't think there are any items in a custom order that are exotic and not readily available off the shelf parts that go into many of the cars, especially since Tesla seems to like to use highly optioned top line models for demo/loaners. Fact is if they were demand constrained as you claim that means there are effectively empty spots in the production line waiting for vehicles to be slotted in. That does not equate to a 1.5 month wait. It's not as if Tesla builds dozens of different models.

Tesla just decided to plug that particular car in a free slot one month from now. Doesn't mean that there aren't any earlier slots available.
 
Now, this is bs, or you are repeating someone else's bs. Is Tesla running 3 shifts? Didn't Tesla also report 2400(or 2200) cars produced in a week? At that rate,it can produce 31200/28600 in 13 weeks. This may not be the most optimal setup, but 25k is definitely not the limit. When the line is running 24 hours, 7 days a week at its max speed, that is the limit.

But I see that you agreed in essence, that Tesla is matching production to demand. If Tesla thought it could sell more S&X easily, wouldn't it be pulling more production levers instead of demand levers? Think about it, and let us know what production levers Tesla has pulled in the last many quarters.
I see that you don't follow Tesla that closely, except maybe for things that fit your bear narrative. Otherwise you would know that Tesla added a third shift at the beginning of 2017. And reduced overtime significantly because it was contributing to worker repetitive stress injuries. The relevant quote from Elon (from the Q1 call) about the S+X line being designed for 100K per year and the difficulty of operating beyond the design limits has been quoted here so many times I'm not going to bother going to find it again.

To expect Tesla or any other manufacturing company to be able to produce at peak weekly output for 13 weeks in a quarter with zero downtime for maintenance or line changes is ridiculous. What profession are you in?
 
So Tesla randomly decides to skip earlier available spots and make customers wait for what reason exactly?

Because it hopes to be able to fill that available earlier slot in the days to come with an order from Florida, so that both orders can be delivered this quarter. This is all well-documented behaviour that is easy to follow in the model S tracking spreadsheet.
 
I see that you don't follow Tesla that closely, except maybe for things that fit your bear narrative. Otherwise you would know that Tesla added a third shift at the beginning of 2017. And reduced overtime significantly because it was contributing to worker repetitive stress injuries. The relevant quote from Elon (from the Q1 call) about the S+X line being designed for 100K per year and the difficulty of operating beyond the design limits has been quoted here so many times I'm not going to bother going to find it again.

To expect Tesla or any other manufacturing company to be able to produce at peak weekly output for 13 weeks in a quarter with zero downtime for maintenance or line changes is ridiculous. What profession are you in?

Yes, I do remember that. As you yourself said, it was to reduce overtime and injury rates during end of quarter pushes. Tesla changed two 12 hour shifts to three 8 hour shifts; so this move doesn't increase production. No word about the middle or beginning of quarters, when Tesla pulls the throttle levers.

Wikipedia said:
Up to May 2010, NUMMI built an average of 6000 vehicles a week, or nearly eight million cars and trucks since opening in 1984.[14][15] In 1997, NUMMI produced 357,809 cars and trucks,[16] peaking at 428,633 units in 2006
NUMMI - Wikipedia
Toyota was making ~400k cars there, so why is Tesla's line designed for only 100K a year, 20 years later, using more modern machines? I think, you will agree it is either intentional or a design flaw to have such low capacity. Electric cars are claimed to have very few moving parts (Ron Baron research), so it should be easier to manufacture. Don't believe everything told in the Tesla ERs; pay attention to what Jeff Evanson says about forward looking statements and the escape paths for execs for what they say in the ERs.

BTW, Nice try diverting the subject with personal attack/query. If I tell you I am the CEO of YumYum electric motors, will you believe my words without all these debates? :)

Another reason for this projected "1.5 month wait time" (3 months at beginning of quarters) could be just a bone that Tesla throws at bulls like @JRP3 and bullish analysts like Jonas, who use it to push their narrative of "Tesla has insatiable demand".
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Krugerrand
Another reason for this projected "1.5 month wait time" (3 months at beginning of quarters) could be just a bone that Tesla throws at bulls like @JRP3 and bullish analysts like Jonas, who use it to push their narrative of "Tesla has insatiable demand".

Don't descend in silly conspiracy theories. There is a perfectly good business explanation why the wait time for Californian orders is just so they can make end of quarter delivery. They need to maximize current quarterly deliveries over future quarterly deliveries. It's unfortunate, but that comes with the territory of being a public company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neroden
Don't descend in silly conspiracy theories. There is a perfectly good business explanation why the wait time for Californian orders is just so they can make end of quarter delivery. They need to maximize current quarterly deliveries over future quarterly deliveries. It's unfortunate, but that comes with the territory of being a public company.

The company has set plenty of precedents for such hypes (hyperboles) without any apparent 'business reason'.
If you see how the bulls like @JRP3 (representing >90% of retail TSLA longs, imho) and some analysts run with these tidbits, it is not that silly. When the company's survival depends on continuous capital raises, execs are cashing their options left and right, and it uses high SP to justify lower wages to employees, I'd argue that keeping the stock price artificially inflated by all means is a paramount 'business reason'.
I won't take anything off the table; Tesla needs to go all out to help with that objective :)

BTW, what 'business explanation' do you have for Tesla to hide ~90% of their inventory? Or the reason to play hide and seek with their inventory cars? Now you see them; now you don't :)
 
BTW, what 'business explanation' do you have for Tesla to hide ~90% of their inventory? Or the reason to play hide and seek with their inventory cars? Now you see them; now you don't :)
Probably because guys like you who don't understand how Tesla's business model is different from all of the other car companies would make erroneous conclusions based on the number of inventory cars. That's the same reason that they don't publish monthly sales figures.
 
This inane demand speculation is why I love the tesla vision and my model s ....but can't make any sense of the stock it is priced for perfection too many years out into the future to make any reasonable conclusion based on 2017 or 2018 demand with looming execution risk .....the junk bond offering is interesting....at least shares outstanding are not diluted.....but makes you think?
 
Sure, like when Elon on three separate occasions said the stock price was too high, that was secretly artificially inflating the price by any means...
That's exactly what I'm talking about! You picked a tidbit and ran with it to prove your view. But the whole double-spoken statement means entirely different.

Paraphrasing Elon, with additional commentary in italics by yours truly:
"Yeah, our SP is high if you base it on where we are today. But based on our future potential, which I have painted with very bright & sparkling colors while wearing the rosiest of my eye glasses for all of you to behold, it is worth a lot more. I have told my German employees, the stock can quadruple soon. Yeah, soon we will sell millions of cars at huge gross margins. We will be a trillion dollar company."

Elon_Sp_tweet_Apr3_2017.JPG
Elon_Sp_tweet_july11_2017.JPG

Probably because guys like you who don't understand how Tesla's business model is different from all of the other car companies would make erroneous conclusions based on the number of inventory cars. That's the same reason that they don't publish monthly sales figures.
Haha! Guys like me are already doing the math and know how many inventory cars are under the surface :) This hide and seek must be for guys & gals who are not like me.
 
Last edited:
  • Disagree
Reactions: Krugerrand
Just looked into the Oct/Nov/Dec table and noticed a crazy amount of orders from Norway.

Checked out elbilforum.no and it seems like they had a 0.25% financing offer until a few days ago.

What's also interesting is that some of those cars already went into production. Maybe Tesla hopes to get those delivered late Q3.
 
  • Informative
  • Helpful
Reactions: mmd and GoTslaGo