There comes a time in every (successful) organization's development when the founder starts to get in the way of growth, rather than promoting it. Mr. Musk is not a Tesla founder but I know he sees himself that way. And we may be nearing the moment when "Founder's Syndrome" is beginning to rear its head: where a charasmatic leader's missteps diminish the organization he helped create. That despite all the nights he spent sleeping on rooftops and factory floors. He's an able problem solver. No, a genius problem solver. But when he generates as many problems as he solves (don't know the exact ratio but there's entries on both sides of that ledger of late) , it's time to think about change.
Robin
Before you make ignorant statements, you should do a simple search to be sure that what you are about to post is accurate. Musk provided the funding for Tesla and had to take over when the CEO proved hiimself inept and dishonest. He is identified as a co-founder because of the funding he provided to get a great idea going. He is the only reason anyone was able to get a roadster and everything after that is due to he driving force. Others were instrumental, but Elon was and is key to the success of the company.
If you have doubts about Elon's ability to lead the company, you should probably sell your shares because you will only find more reasons to be upset and frustrated going forward.