Daniel in SD
(supervised)
Yes, the California state legislature would never pass a law that violates the US Constitution.Also, if you don’t like the law as written, please contact the California legislature.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, the California state legislature would never pass a law that violates the US Constitution.Also, if you don’t like the law as written, please contact the California legislature.
Absolutely ethical if you are trying to show problems with verification and draw the attention of lawmakers.
As I said this is common with "white hat hacking", public "bug bash" etc.
Not always true.FYI - white hat hacking isn't exactly legal. Most companies look the other way, because it benefits them to have someone point out their bugs for a fee, but by the letter of the law, it's not legal.
Fair enough. There are what I think are horrible people in this world that would think it’s okay to impersonate someone (when it’s not clear it’s parody) and then try to make that person look bad.Don't assume your specific "morality" is universal.
Now you’re saying that their intent was to show problems in verification. That may have been some of the intent but I think it could have been handled way differently. It could just be pointed out the issues and let Twitter solve them.Absolutely ethical if you are trying to show problems with verification and draw the attention of lawmakers.
As I said this is common with "white hat hacking", public "bug bash" etc.
There is zero chance even Justice Thomas would find it wrong
"harm to Elon" is not the legal issue. Ofcourse when you show any company's products have problems, you are causing its owner "harm".Now you’re saying that their intent was to show problems in verification. That may have been some of the intent but I think it could have been handled way differently. It could just be pointed out the issues and let Twitter solve them.
I do think some of the intent was to cause harm to Elon.
Not always true.
Companies invite hackers to find bugs. Its been going on for years. Why is that not "legal" ?
Google invites hackers to break in
The online giant kicks off an experimental program that allows security researchers to find bugs in its sitewww.infoworld.com
I'm not sure by which law its illegal .... but IANAL.They don't make threats to release anything, but because they did it without explicit permission, but law, it's illegal.
I'm not sure by which law its illegal .... but IANAL.
ps : DMCA ?
Well the problem is that the goal here is to cut costs to make money for one of the richest people alive.
I doubt there are many people who would find this very inspiring.
Well, the House is calling SBM to testify ...Biden is the one giving the money to Ukraine who is giving it to FTX who is giving it to candidates. You need to keep up on your conspiracies. Given all the folks Elon responds to these days it’s definitely all over his timeline.
OTOH Tesla and SpaceX are among the top 2, if not the top 2, desired destinations for engineering graduates. They seem to find it inspiring even if it makes money for the richest person alive.
As an engineer, having a green field to play on and innovate is a lot more inspiring than doing maintenance on a bloated code base.
DMCA would be involved if hacking requires any kind of decryption ?It's illegal, and doesn't involve DMCA (which is copyright claims):
Is Hacking a Crime? United States Hacking Laws Explained - Julie Rendelman
While some state laws can be traced back hundreds of years, computer hacking, computer fraud – and similar computer crimes – are a comparatively new area of law. Since the federal laws relating to computer hacking are so new, it can sometimes be challenging to find a defense attorney with...www.rendelmanlaw.com
My background is tech as well. 32 years. Dedication is a reasonable ask, especially with small and efficient teams.I couldn't disagree more. I've been in Silicon Valley for 30+ years and have seen people happily work 80+ hour weeks for a product/company they believe in. A team of 10 great engineers who are highly motivated can do more than a 500 person team of mediocre people that don't care.
DMCA would be involved if hacking requires any kind of decryption ?
Anyway I guess one could argue the below applies to white hats.
Either way, getting verification with a different name would not come under this
- Obtaining information from a computer without authorization (computer trespass)
Skippy? Why are you getting into mean name calling hereUh skippy, that's simply not true. MOST of the bannings were against obvious parodies.
Reality is kinda hard, but you really should take a look at it.
Some people here are moving the goalposts when it suits their narrative. Being a free speech absolutist is Elon's PERSONAL view but nobody said it would be applied to Twitter. Some people are just arguing against strawmen.I’m not even sure why people are still arguing about this. Elon has said there will be content moderation on Twitter. That is obviously not free speech absolutism (I.e. whatever is legal). Which is fine because nobody actually wants that.
We really don't know what brackets Musk is putting around this.I’m not even sure why people are still arguing about this. Elon has said there will be content moderation on Twitter. That is obviously not free speech absolutism (I.e. whatever is legal). Which is fine because nobody actually wants that.