Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Hi, I’m a short seller

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
long dated puts have basically doubled to quadrupled in price this year. You do know you have to cover them at expiration right?

I certainly don't have to cover them if they expire (you do know what "expire" means, right?), and the strikes I sold are still out of the money. TSLA would have to drop well below $250 and stay there in order for me to lose money on the deal and that is simply not going to happen.

The time value and corresponding decay on these is absurdly high, due to fools like the one who started this thread. I'm actually up already.

If TSLA actually drops well below the strike price, I'll be happy to pick up the extra shares; it'll be a very good purchase price. I have the resources to buy the stock at those prices.
 
If you sold any to me you are solidly underwater thanks to our boy’s petulant demeanor yesterday.
Ah, you only got into the trade recently? I sold mine a while back and am solidly up.

Recommendation: get out of your trade now. You can make money on this sort of swing-trading short-term but you're going to be metaphorically run over by a bus if you hold past Q3 earnings.
 
I don’t think the call went well (although profitable for me). Elon snubbing a few of the Wall Street guys is biting the hand that feeds you. They put out the price targets, research notes, etc. that have been propping up the stock price so far.
On a side note, the YouTube guy asked very good questions.

Which is why Musk answered them. It was appreciated. I'm getting as tired as Musk of wasting my time listening to really dumb questions from really dumb "analysts".
 
Jbcarioca, I very much appreciate your personal posts. My father, during his work on hybrid systems, taught me all about the critical importance of boundary conditions in mathematical models -- and mentioned that sloppy engineers usually ignored them.

That is an excellent question. The securities analysts always must ascribe evaluations and they do, often quite weak in logic, but not always.
There are bad incentives. In particular, an analyst, like an investment adviser, has a very strong incentive to say *something* -- an incentive to pretend to know something when he doesn't. The analyst who honestly says "damned if I know what you should invest in", or the analysts who says "This stock will be worth between $0 and $1 million", isn't really valuable to anyone and is unlikely to continue getting paid.

However, forecasting is hard, so most of the time, you actually can't do a reasonable forecast; only occasionally can you actually make anything approximating a reasonable prediction. Someone without the perverse incentives might only make forecasts occasionally. But someone paid as an analyst or adviser or manager doesn't have that option. They have to recommend *something* or make *some* price forecast, rather than just saying "Outside my area of expertise". This leads to a lot of nonsense.
 
The core difference I see in long term shorts (such as purchasing '19 or '20 Puts, or selling shares short) and long term owners (such as myself), is that we both talk about products and finances, but we lead with different items. I lead with products and monitor finances of the company for follow through and avoidance of inability to continue.

Shorts talk about company financials, and are largely confused about the company products.

Product matters.
Yeah, a balance sheet means nothing unless you understand what's going on underneath it. The fact is that every industry and every business has its own "quirks" -- you have to know the sector and the individual business in order to actually read the balance sheet. Some sectors have perenially overstated depreciation; others have perennially understated depreciation. Some companies are not running the business model which the rest of the sector is running.

As an amusing example, which someone may wish to use some time: Stocks in the railroad sector can be swing-traded by watching maintenance expenditures. When maintenance expenditures are cut, the idiots on Wall Street see higher profits and the stock price rises, but in five years, profits start to crash as deferred maintenance catches up and poor operations drive away customers. When maintenance expenditures rise, the idiots on Wall Street see lower profits and the stock price drops, but in five years, profits rise as the benefit of a well-maintained network kicks in. There's lots of stuff like this all over the market.
 
Whats the benefit of holding BRK.B over the S&P index?
I wasn't the one you asked, but in my opinion, the advantages are:
1 -- less exposure to fraud stocks like the megabanks, which dominate the S&P (though Warren's idiot purchase of Wells Fargo has hurt performance; I actually warned him about it by a letter two years before the scandal broke, but he ignored me);
2 -- less exposure to the fossil fuel sector (Berkshire Hathaway Energy is a leader among utility companies in going all-renewable)
3 -- lower fees

A fossil-fuel-free ETF would probably be better at this point though. I'm sitting on a lot of BRK with old purchase dates and a lot of deferred gain, though, so the cost of switching is high.
 
I was referring to the possibility of turning $30 into $300+. I would have done that.

Regarding Tesla’s past brushes with bankruptcy, they came close in 2008, but Daimler stepped in with a $50 million investment. In 2015, it was rumored they were close in early 2013. It wasn’t reported at the time however.

In 2013, as we discovered later, they were close to *selling to Google*. Think hard about the difference between "bankruptcy" and "selling your entire startup to Google". If you still believe that Tesla will go bankrupt due to inability to raise cash, you might also consider Larry Page's statement that he'd rather leave all his money to Elon Musk than to charity.
 
In 2013, as we discovered later, they were close to *selling to Google*. Think hard about the difference between "bankruptcy" and "selling your entire startup to Google". If you still believe that Tesla will go bankrupt due to inability to raise cash, you might also consider Larry Page's statement that he'd rather leave all his money to Elon Musk than to charity.
In 2013 I might have agreed with you. 2018 is completely different, Elon is looking more and more to be out of control, and he’s taking the company down with him.
 
Ah, you only got into the trade recently? I sold mine a while back and am solidly up.

Recommendation: get out of your trade now. You can make money on this sort of swing-trading short-term but you're going to be metaphorically run over by a bus if you hold past Q3 earnings.
There won’t be any earnings in Q3, just higher losses. A few of us think they might not even make it until then.

As for me, I started buying put spreads in the Fall, was down for a while, now profitable. I doubled down this morning after Elon’s Twitter rant. He is becoming unglued.
 
If you sold any to me you are solidly underwater thanks to our boy’s petulant demeanor yesterday.

Could you give us some insight into your confidence levels after Elons Tweet today?


  1. Elon Musk‏Verified account @elonmusk 2h2 hours ago


    Oh and uh short burn of the century comin soon. Flamethrowers should arrive just in time.


  2. Fred Lambert‏Verified account @FredericLambert 2h2 hours ago
    Is a "short burn of the century" as bad as a "tsunami of hurt"?

Elon Musk‏Verified account @elonmusk
Replying to @FredericLambert
It will be next level. These are really big numbers.


Have you already covered or do you have balls?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EinSV
Could you give us some insight into your confidence levels after Elons Tweet today?


  1. Elon Musk‏Verified account @elonmusk 2h2 hours ago


    Oh and uh short burn of the century comin soon. Flamethrowers should arrive just in time.


  2. Fred Lambert‏Verified account @FredericLambert 2h2 hours ago
    Is a "short burn of the century" as bad as a "tsunami of hurt"?

Elon Musk‏Verified account @elonmusk
Replying to @FredericLambert
It will be next level. These are really big numbers.


Have you already covered or do you have balls?
I doubled down actually. When a CEO starts a “blame the shorts” campaign, it’s a sign they are becoming unhinged. Ask Dick Fuld and Jeff Skilling about it.