Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Is it unethical to charge extra for Autopilot (software) after we had paid for the hardware?

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
I support Tesla’s vision and have always recommended them to friends and coworkers. With the latest firmware, I was able to try Autopilot for the first time and would like to buy it - but I’m having a hard time justifying the purchase.

If I had to bring the car in for service to have them install additional sensors or cameras, then I’m all for shelling out the $6000.
However, with a 30min software download, I now have Autopilot, which means I had already paid for the hardware. It’s like buying an iPhone with camera enabled, but live video recording disabled unless you download a paid app.

I think Tesla should’ve offered an option with less Autopilot hardware for less than the $49k base. Or they should’ve raised the base price and made Autopilot standard. It leaves a bad taste to take away a feature when the car you bought already has the hardware. If it’s a monthly subscription fee for a modest $25-$50 for server maintenance, improvements and updates, then yes. $6000 is just too much.

I’m sure Tesla already factored in the cost of BOM and included that in our invoice. $6000 goes straight to the bottom line.

Curious to hear your thoughts. Thanks all
 
Most of the Autopilot hardware is in active use in even cars without EAP. It used for FCW, AEB, and SCW for example.

Sure they could leave a few of the cameras off, but they need all of the computing power, radar, and ultrasonic sensors... The $6k is for the software, not the hardware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jedi2155
You paid for the hardware because the car already do things that requires the hardware. Forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, lane assist warnings including steering intervention, etc.. are all standard on all Model 3's. They use the autopilot hardware. The hardware is simply capable of more, which you pay for if you wish to unlock.

It's very much like iphones, you could download apps or pay for apps to do things that the default phone won't do. Because your iphone is capable of much more than what the default apps show you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anticitizen13.7
I imagine there is a ton of cost in not just the software development for EAP, but also liability/legal issues as well if something goes wrong with the system in a way the driver can't intervene.

So it's perfectly ethical to charge people for the EAP package.

What I do believe is ethically challenging is to promise features, and then never deliver on them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C141medic and Vaxe
But how sure are we that Tesla did not already spread EAP development cost into the $49k base price? I don’t think they would stake recouping all that software R&D cost to consumer choice.

You paid for the hardware because the car already do things that requires the hardware. Forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, lane assist warnings including steering intervention, etc.. are all standard on all Model 3's. They use the autopilot hardware. The hardware is simply capable of more, which you pay for if you wish to unlock.

It's very much like iphones, you could download apps or pay for apps to do things that the default phone won't do. Because your iphone is capable of much more than what the default apps show you.
 
I think Tesla should’ve offered an option with less Autopilot hardware for less than the $49k base.

That would ruin one of the best things about Tesla. That is the active safety (AEB/FCW/etc) requires that hardware. So by releasing it without the hardware makes the car less safe.

There also is an agreement among the NHTSA, and various car manufactures to have automatic emergency braking technologies on all their cars by a certain date. The SAME hardware that's used for the convenience package is used for active safety like AEB.
 
I’ve bought IT data center hardware that had the hardware capabilities for a number of features that I didn’t pay for and they don’t work unless I purchase them and obtain the necessary license key.

Bottom line is that if you understand what you’re buying, there’s nothing wrong with that business approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SSedan and Vaxe
As long as you are aware of the terms when purchasing the car, there is nothing unethical.

Tesla chooses to build AP into every car whether they get paid for it or not. They also choose to charge less for AP when you buy it initially. They have every right to make both of those choices.
But why would they not want to get paid? My point is how do we know we didn’t already pay for EAP development cost in our invoice?