Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Is Tesla going to end up like Tucker Motors?

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
In 1948, a visionary named Preston Tucker tried to change the automotive industry.

Some components and features of the car were innovative and ahead of their time.

1) The most recognizable feature of the Tucker '48, a directional third headlight (known as the "Cyclops Eye" ), would activate at steering angles of greater than 10 degrees to light the car's path around corners.

2) A perimeter frame surrounded the vehicle for crash protection, as well as a roll bar integrated into the roof.

3) The windshield was made of shatterproof glass and designed to pop out in a collision to protect occupants.

4) The doors extended into the roof, to ease entry and exit.

5) A collapsible steering column design.

6) A glove box was added to the front door panels instead of the more conventional location in the dash to provide space for the “crash chamber” that the Tucker is now famous for. This is a padded area ahead of the passenger seat, free from obstructions, providing the front seat passengers an area to protect themselves in the event of an accident.

7) The engine and transmission were mounted on a separate subframe which was secured with only six bolts. The entire drive train could thus be lowered and removed from the car in minutes. Tucker envisioned loaner engines being quickly swapped in for service in just 30 minutes.

All these items are found on cars today and thought of as standard features. Only 51 cars were made before the company folded on March 3, 1949, due to negative publicity initiated by the news media, a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation and a heavily publicized stock fraud trial (in which allegations were proven baseless in court with a full acquittal). Speculation exists that the Big Three automakers and Michigan senator Homer S. Ferguson also had a role in the Tucker Corporation's demise.

It has happen before, lets hope history does not repeat itself with Tesla..
 
Last edited:
Random observation...
Lot of identical text here: 1948 Tucker Sedan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why reinvent the wheel? I should have quoted the source..

So many of Preston's ideas just like Elon's ideas where/are ahead of the time. Most people laughed and thought they were ridiculous and unnecessary. Just like many of the ICE owners think about EV.

Look at how many ideas of Tuckers are present in today's cars and in Tesla?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nikielizabeth
Tesla has far surpassed Preston Tucker's achievements and DeLorean's as well. I would group the EV-1 in there too, though not a manufacturer, it was a great idea that was killed off due to an outside force, or many forces, that saw it as a threat. If Tesla were to fail, it would be by their own hand. The only way I can see that happening it through a sale of the company and mismanagement by the subsequent owner. Elon's vision seems clear to me; I don't think anyone else could pull it off. He is just as much Tesla as the car is.
 
Is Tesla going to end up like Tucker Motors?

I'll bite, so what is your view? Did Tucker have an equivalent $17 billion capitalization in 1948 dollars?

Larry

By the spring of 1948, the initial public offering of the stock had only raised $15 million, rather than the expected $20 million.

$15,000,000.00 in 1948 dollars are worth $116,977,526.12 in 2013.

While not $17 billion, Tucker did have $116,977,526.12 (in current dollars) to produce his vehicles.

While I admit the movie makes it out that there was a conspiracy. It looks like financial mismanagement is more likely the cause of the company's downfall.

My point is the movie portrays the automotive industry killing Tucker motors because it was a threat. Wouldn't gas/oil industries, automotive and certain government lobbyist see Tesla as a threat to their interests and pocket books?

I know I am speculating/speaking out loud.. To me it is possible for these parties to make it difficult for Tesla.. Make it hard to register/license a Tesla (jump through a bunch of hoops like Texas. Which is a large oil producing state). Or like Virginia that is a coal producing state which would be full support of EV. Except now they are more interested in fracking and natural gas production and not very supportive of EV/Tesla..
The whole manufacturer can't be a dealership issue stopping from opening up dealerships in all 50 states and selling them.

(i am sure some of this is not correct/exact, this is from skimming TMC)

As a TSLA stockholder and future Tesla owner (model x). I am a full supporter of Tesla and want them to succeed.
 
By the spring of 1948, the initial public offering of the stock had only raised $15 million, rather than the expected $20 million.

$15,000,000.00 in 1948 dollars are worth $116,977,526.12 in 2013.

While not $17 billion, Tucker did have $116,977,526.12 (in current dollars) to produce his vehicles.

While I admit the movie makes it out that there was a conspiracy. It looks like financial mismanagement is more likely the cause of the company's downfall.

My point is the movie portrays the automotive industry killing Tucker motors because it was a threat. Wouldn't gas/oil industries, automotive and certain government lobbyist see Tesla as a threat to their interests and pocket books?

I know I am speculating/speaking out loud.. To me it is possible for these parties to make it difficult for Tesla.. Make it hard to register/license a Tesla (jump through a bunch of hoops like Texas. Which is a large oil producing state). Or like Virginia that is a coal producing state which would be full support of EV. Except now they are more interested in fracking and natural gas production and not very supportive of EV/Tesla..
The whole manufacturer can't be a dealership issue stopping from opening up dealerships in all 50 states and selling them.

(i am sure some of this is not correct/exact, this is from skimming TMC)

As a TSLA stockholder and future Tesla owner (model x). I am a full supporter of Tesla and want them to succeed.

Thanks very much for the helpful background.

However, you didn't answer the question.

What is your view? Is Tesla going to end up like Tucker Motors? :wink:

Larry
 
Thanks very much for the helpful background.

However, you didn't answer the question.

What is your view? Is Tesla going to end up like Tucker Motors? :wink:

Larry

I do not believe that the company will fail from inside... If it did fail it would be from outside sources..

As it was mentioned during Q2 conference call..

" We have production constraints, not demand constraint. "

" We are not trying to push it higher than that because it's kind of pointless to push volume when you don't have the production to meet it."

It is clear that their vendors were not expecting the demand and not able to tool up to meet the demand. So this is a potential bottle neck that could be severely affected by outside sources.. If a major disruption (war, flood, earthquake, embargo, hurricane, etc) happened to Panasonic production facility that effect Tesla battery production. It will really hurt and hamper Tesla's growth especially when ramping up production..

Another scenario is if Elon gets tired of the EV car world. Sells the company to Toyota like he sold paypal to ebay. At which point the champion/motivator/passion behind Tesla would be gone. At which point the company is swallowed up by Toyota and Tesla becomes just another boring Toyota model..

I know Elon stepping aside is far fetched and he promise his money ($100 million) in stocks will be last out.. (can't find the direct quote right now)

The company won't fail on it's own..
 
By the spring of 1948, the initial public offering of the stock had only raised $15 million, rather than the expected $20 million.

$15,000,000.00 in 1948 dollars are worth $116,977,526.12 in 2013.

While not $17 billion, Tucker did have $116,977,526.12 (in current dollars) to produce his vehicles.

(Slight difference at least according to http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ where $15 million in 1948 is $145,391,701.24 today.)

I assume there was indeed some form of conspiracy against Tucker's business, but I agree that they themselves were prolly equally to blame.

So far Tesla has been executing pretty brilliantly. The last thing I equate them with is Tucker. I'm a long-term investor and my car is in production right now and I can't wait to get it.
 
I think you could have made this comparison early roadster days, but not now.

Elon Musk once said, "If I had a dime for every time someone brought up Tucker I would not have need any loans to build the Roadster."

(or something like that)
Those are my thoughts. My own parents had basically the same question when I put the deposit down on the Model S. My answer then (almost 3 years ago now) was basically that I might end up with a collector's item and that an electric car isn't as complicated as an ICE. Besides... Roadster.

The question now might be if Tesla becomes like Saturn. That is very unlikely, but more likely than Tucker at this point.
 
Those are my thoughts. My own parents had basically the same question when I put the deposit down on the Model S. My answer then (almost 3 years ago now) was basically that I might end up with a collector's item and that an electric car isn't as complicated as an ICE. Besides... Roadster.

The question now might be if Tesla becomes like Saturn. That is very unlikely, but more likely than Tucker at this point.
Has anybody put together a list of all automobile companies in history sorted (roughly) by number of vehicles produced yet? It would be fun to follow Tesla's rise in this ranking.
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: SW2Fiddler
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Tucker also have disc brakes and seat belts as standard? I seem to recall that there was a lot of opposition to including seat belts in the industry because they thought that just having seat belts in the car would remind customers that cars ARE dangerous and COULD crash and you MIGHT die from it.