JeffK
Well-Known Member
Nah, it's the same subject.So does body mass, however I guess that's a different subject.
The model with a metal roof will out accelerate the glass roof option due to decreased mass.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah, it's the same subject.So does body mass, however I guess that's a different subject.
Nah, it's the same subject.
The model with a metal roof will out accelerate the glass roof option due to decreased mass.
I'm sure no one in Europe will even put in a reservation... /sarcasmGoing beyond all the admirable comment on the aesthetics of the so-far-released Model 3 design; for many markets, most particularly the UK and rest of Europe, Model 3 HAS to have a hatchback tailgate (or at least there should be a variant hatchback version).
Without hatchback provision the 3 will not sell well in the UK and rest of Europe. This is because Model 3 is a mid-size car in European terms. Hatchbacks dominate the European mid-sized sector, customers demand this practicality in their cars. It is market suicide for any manufacturer selling into to Europe to ignore this reality (regardless of a car platform's propulsion technology).
I wish Illinois residents didn't have to have front license plates
Skinning a cat is horrible.
It's only market suicide if that is the primary market, and it isn't. More than half of the cars Tesla sells go to markets where the hatch is not the predominate choice so not having one doesn't affect them that much at all. With that being said, those that really want a hatch can wait until the next model, that will likely be an SUV with a hatch.Going beyond all the admirable comment on the aesthetics of the so-far-released Model 3 design; for many markets, most particularly the UK and rest of Europe, Model 3 HAS to have a hatchback tailgate (or at least there should be a variant hatchback version).
Without hatchback provision the 3 will not sell well in the UK and rest of Europe. This is because Model 3 is a mid-size car in European terms. Hatchbacks dominate the European mid-sized sector, customers demand this practicality in their cars. It is market suicide for any manufacturer selling into to Europe to ignore this reality (regardless of a car platform's propulsion technology).
ot?.. as if skinning a chicken or cattle or fish is any less horrible.. anyway that is OT..
Going beyond all the admirable comment on the aesthetics of the so-far-released Model 3 design; for many markets, most particularly the UK and rest of Europe, Model 3 HAS to have a hatchback tailgate (or at least there should be a variant hatchback version).
Without hatchback provision the 3 will not sell well in the UK and rest of Europe. This is because Model 3 is a mid-size car in European terms. Hatchbacks dominate the European mid-sized sector, customers demand this practicality in their cars. It is market suicide for any manufacturer selling into to Europe to ignore this reality (regardless of a car platform's propulsion technology).
Like I said, I don't need a strip either and prefer it without. While it can be an eye-catcher, ultimately I think it's tacky and gaudy.Doesn't look "empty" to me, I prefer the minimalist look as compared to the busier Model S back end.
Compared to any other current production car that I can think of (and I am sure that someone will come up with an example) the Model 3 design is simpler and cleaner so it may strike some people as odd or too unusual.
Aesthetics are subjective, of course.
Without hatchback provision the 3 will not sell well in the UK and rest of Europe. This is because Model 3 is a mid-size car in European terms. Hatchbacks dominate the European mid-sized sector, customers demand this practicality in their cars. It is market suicide for any manufacturer selling into to Europe to ignore this reality (regardless of a car platform's propulsion technology).
This is where the S/X have that shiny metallic bar connecting the taillights, but the 3 is missing that (probably because it screams "premium" if not a bit tacky).
It looks empty, like something is missing. This is accentuated by the cut-off taillights. It's almost like the car was designed with the metal strip, but then they pried it off and left the rest as is. The visible license plate lights give it an unfinished feel as well, like parts are hanging out. The metal strip covers this on the S/X and ties the whole back end of the car together with the added bonus of a nice T E S L A logo to ensure the guy following you knows what to look up when he gets home. The lack of such on the 3 makes the back feel bland and incomplete. I'm not asking for a metal strip, but I am asking for the back not to look like it needs a metal strip
Another reason this car will look best in black. The silver T emblem will provide greater contrast, even with a shadow cast upon it. While we're on the subject of shadows, shadows are black, and a black car will make the front end stick out less awkwardly and with less controversy.
It appears to me that the asymmetry is not the plate lights, it's the rear view camera placed slightly off center, I assume because the trunk release point is in the center.you can even see the license plate lights which is bad enough, nevermind the asymmetry of them!
After about 10 years of hatchbacks, I'm actually looking forward to getting back to the noise isolation that a trunk brings. As long as it has a pass through for skis (and 2x4's), I'll be happy.
YesAre they really that much quieter? I never really thought about that...