Instead of addressing your digs (as well as others) in the form of personal attacks on my intellectual aptitude (or according to you the lack thereof) at this time, I choose to concern myself with the more so pertinent issue, i.e., "heat transference as the byproduct of work/friction:
Well I have four words for you: First Law of Thermodynamics.
So come on then, hit us up with how you intend to break it. Now's your chance.
Well, I actually have two(2) methods of circumventing/
breaking the "First Law of Thermodynamics" depending upon the application which amounts to little more than removing from the equation/process that which is creating the heat (the troublemaker), i.e., circuitry generated heat and mechanical friction, both of which concern the operational processes of the Tesla Roadster's technology.
The first of which being
Adiabatic system processes achieved via reversible, pipelined logic gates.
You see, while there are the typical forms of thermodynamic processes that are regulated by the definition you reference, i.e., isobaric, isochoric, and isothermal, my comments are more so oriented towards the less referenced, often discounted/disputed, adiabatic process wherein no heat is added or removed from a system. The first law of thermodynamics is thus reduced to saying that the change in the internal energy of a system undergoing an adiabatic change is equal to -W. Since the internal energy is directly proportional to temperature, the work becomes:
As for the second method, well, that deals with the process of
Diamagnetism, i.e., the property of a material/substance being repelled by
both poles of a magnet.
Coincidentally, most substances that are commonly considered to be nonmagnetic, such as water, are actually
diamagnetic. Though diamagnetism typically exhibits a very weak effect compared with ferromagnetism and paramagnetism, it
can be employed to produce often very exciting effects such as levitating objects, e.g., rotors within the coils of a motor.
Understand
now?
dpeilow said:
Oh - and do so objectively. Consider your previous posts strike 2.
"Strike"
this.
As with most of the conflict that I encounter when attempting to disseminate information to others, it is often the byproduct of their not understanding the concepts that I'm attempting to convey, which is only exacerbated by their unwillingness to allow me the opportunity to explain myself, choosing instead to belittle and berate my contribution(s) as nonsensical gibberish/rantings of a
confused troll.
When there is something that you do not quite understand/a concept that you do not quite grasp, it is
always the best policy to ask a question and, if need be/if your ego demands it, look/feel a little foolish for a minute or two than it is to never ask a question and remain foolish about the matter for the rest of your life...some good advice that has served me well over the years as I am in the habit of asking
alot of questions, afterall, who wants to go through life looking foolish, particularly if they are not?!
dpeilow said:
Just-an-allusion
Because of persistent off-topic and abusive posts, and complaints from several members of the site, you have been restricted to posting in the off-topic section of the site only.
The next abusive post will earn you a ban, no questions asked.
Sir, I believe that you stand corrected and, as such, now owe me an apology.
ress Releases - Development of the World's First Fuel Cell Hybrid Railcar
