re Rotenburg/Finland: I haven't determined whether he truly has citizenship or just a passport. In the US, the latter are provided only to the former...I believe. Still awaiting input from a Finn on this.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pérez replaced Debbie Wasserman Schultz, whose preferencial treatment of Clinton over other candidates was infamous. But the DNC continues to impede primary candidates opposing incumbents, especially corporate Democrats. The DNC is firmly under the control of the Corporate Wing of the party.
Hello everyone,
[...]
- Warren seems to be *a lot* weaker politically. She wasn't bold enough to endorse Bernie in 2016 but rather waited and endorsed Hillary instead.
- Warren also constantly champions the bad impact of money in politics but will take corporate PAC money in the generals. She also funneled her Senate race money containing corp. PAC money into her 2020 campaign and is surrounding herself with some questionable PAC actors.
- Although this is, of course, not in her control, the fact that Neera Tanden is speaking positively about her (repeatedly and repeatedly) seems a bit suspicious to me (the same Neera Tanden that is the president of the pro-establishment think thank Center for American progress; the same Neera Tanden that met in secret with Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Pete Buttigieg, et al to discuss how to stop Bernie).
- Again, while this is not in her control at all, her recent very positive coverage in the media where she seems to be used as an argument to discredit Bernie is also looking a bit weird to me.
[...]
It's quite possible that Bernie has no personal issue with a woman president, but after Hillary's loss in 2016 came to the conclusion that the US electorate isn't ready for a woman president. Hillary asserted that at least one reason for her loss in 2016 was misogyny. There are some people, mostly members of socially conservative religious groups, who don't believe a woman should be head of state, but most of those people vote Republican anyway.
I don't think there is as much resistance to a woman getting elected as some people think. Some people judge the same behavior between men and women differently. A bold man is seen as strong, but a woman doing the same thing is seen in a more negative light. However, I think many of these people don't have any deep seated ideals against a woman president and if the right combination of character and policy came along, they would vote for her. Polls have shown Michelle Obama would have done very well if she had decided to run. But she knows better.
U.S. coal-fired power plants closing fast despite Trump's pledge of support for industry
U.S. coal-fired power plants shut down at the second-fastest pace on record in 2019, despite President Donald Trump’s efforts to prop up the industry, according to data from the federal government and Thomson Reuters.
Toxic emissions should absolutely be regulated away. Should have happened a long time ago. Market is slow and stupid.
If we weren't subsidizing oil like crazy for the past 40 years, the market would have taken care of this already.
Sorry, but I'm very much a "government keep your hands off" except for nacent technologies that need to be incubated. Solar and wind were that way, but now they are cost competitive enough that I'm happy to see their tax incentives expire over the next few years.
Maybe. A certain amount of computational power advances needed to take place before motor control and battery management was sophisticated enough. Chip speed and circuit board fabrication advances were driven by other industries.If we weren't subsidizing oil like crazy for the past 40 years, the market would have taken care of this already.
No, incentives for renewables will only speed the transition. Our power grid cannot transition quickly enough.Sorry, but I'm very much a "government keep your hands off" except for nacent technologies that need to be incubated. Solar and wind were that way, but now they are cost competitive enough that I'm happy to see their tax incentives expire over the next few years.
Yes market participants and proponents of coal will get silicosis and asbestosis. They will not be able to participate in the market. The market has spoken...As it should be. Let the market determine these things, not regulations.
Given the last 24h, I've decided to pause my lurking and revisit my first post on this website. This 'news' was just dropped by CNN:
Bernie Sanders told Elizabeth Warren in private 2018 meeting that a woman can't win, sources say - CNNPolitics
Given that Bernie heavily encouraged Warren to run against Clinton in 2016 and only decided to run himself after she decided not to - this is almost certainly a disgusting lie.
"The description of that meeting is based on the accounts of four people: two people Warren spoke with directly soon after the encounter, and two people familiar with the meeting."
This, in my opinion, makes it highly probable that this story is originating from the Warren campaign. If Warren does not speak out against this, just like her comunications director didn't ("Warren's communications director Kristen Orthman declined to comment."), it unfortunately underlines the suspicion that I outlined in my quoted post: the opportunistic nature of her campaign.
Didn't want to ruin this amazing day of TSLA breaking through 500, so I also wanted thank all of the posters here that continue to push against the anti-progressive nature of the US media and politics. Seeing the type of YouTube channels and tweets that get posted here and the arguments that are being made in favor of policies such as the GND are very encouraging to see!
Crossing my fingers for a positive primary.
Personally I'd rather Bernie describe himself as a FDR Democrat or even an Eisenhower Republican. I was born be for FDR died.R
He raised the alarm last night on Brian Williams show about Bernie Sanders. He has said in the past he respects Bernie Sanders, but his history and politics is a very deep vein for the remaining slime throwers working for the GOP to mine. One of the biggest divides politically in the United States between those born before about 1980 and those born after is the meaning of the term "socialist". Those born after 1980 don't really remember the Soviet Union, it fell apart while they were children or before they were born. Their formative years were in the post Soviet era.
For those born before 1980, even for those who are deep down lefties, the term "socialist" has been linked to communism and all the bad memes about it we were bombarded with during the cold war. Those of us who think it through know that there is a big difference between western European socialistic democracy and the USSR, but for a large number of older Americans who have never really thought about it, their system is loading with negative memes about "socialism" that can be reactivated with the right ad campaign. Political advertisers who know how to hit those limbic buttons want Bernie to be the Democratic nominee because they will have older independents cowering in the corner about the new red menace in a few weeks of advertising blitz.
So you think accusing Sanders of sexism and lying is the way for her to become his VP choice?