Meh. It's faster than top supercomputers 20 years ago and it's faster than a modern desktop machine at those particular calculations...
First...Nvidia’s Words, not mine. https://electrek.co/2017/05/22/tesla-nvidia-supercomputer-self-driving-autopilot/, next. There is an airbag control module that run on 1’s and 0’s. But the main point is this individual drove when they should not have and call into question the safety of the car we are fanatical about in the forum for fanatics. The person who crashed has a pattern of poor choices, blaming the car is ridiculous. The courts historically side with me on this one and it’s a simple exercise in root cause analysis.
I used that word because it is bantered about frequently. It was a shorthand way to get the idea across. In your hypothetical situation, I wouldn't blame the car either. But I would be asking questions about whether or not the airbags should have deployed.wcorey said:
The OP never asked about the tax credit or how to game the system. That was brought up by others. And there's nothing wrong with trying to limit the financial impact of anything, assuming honest behavior. (Fraud would be a different story.)wcorey said:
wcorey said:
Or perhaps Emergency Braking, on even non EAP cars slowed the car to lower than airbag deployment speed.
I got that sense from many of the posts. I get having a ruptured appendix is painful and the experience was unnerving. I do. Asking for technical information on how the Tesla should respond is best asked to a Tesla tech support rep, not customer service. Someone was responding to OP re: dual tax credits and his/her taxable income being too low. It did not ref earlier convo. I assumed it was part of an earlier convo. I cannot say if I've seen every last post he made. Chances are good he can call Tesla mobile service to come and collect data even if car is at body shop. Some assumptions I've made are very few owners actually read the owners manual as what the car would do is pretty clear. But to come out of the gate assuming the car did not function and was not safe is assuming facts clearly not in evidence and is highly prejudicial.After reading the OP's first post, I wondered the same as you (presumably) if s/he was looking for someone to blame. But after seeing the OP's responses, I believe they are genuinely wondering why things happened the way they did.
As for your earlier comment:
I used that word because it is bantered about frequently. It was a shorthand way to get the idea across. In your hypothetical situation, I wouldn't blame the car either. But I would be asking questions about whether or not the airbags should have deployed.
The OP never asked about the tax credit or how to game the system. That was brought up by others. And there's nothing wrong with trying to limit the financial impact of anything, assuming honest behavior. (Fraud would be a different story.)
As for attacking others, I can't speak for the OP, but I suspect it's more a case of defending their honor against the attacks by the "haters".
"Under a minute" to go from annoying to incapacitating pain. Taking the OP at their word, incapacitating would mean they could no longer choose to do anything about it. I'm sure if the OP had time to avoid the crash, they would have done so.
I'm interested in whether or not the car had EAP and if not, will the OP buy it on the replacement car (assuming they get another Model 3).
I would say, if for no other reason, PR. I have no doubt this will be picked up elsewhere and used to bolster agendas so it would be in Tesla's interest to have sufficient info to say definitively what happened, what driver input there was and what the software did.
