Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Blog Model 3: Is The Long Range Battery Worth It?

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
At $9,000 US, one of the pricier options for Model 3 is range. The Standard Range (SR) vehicle comes with 220 miles of EPA-rated range and a Long Range (LR) car has 310 miles. Is the long-range upgrade worth $9,000 for 90 more miles? Today, we’ll explore this question.

You need to understand your personal driving needs. If you’ll never use the additional 90 miles, you might as well save the money. If, however, you’ll use it or it would give you peace of mind and you can afford it, you should get the LR.

Faster Charging

In addition to the extra range, the LR will also charge faster when connected to Tesla’s High Power Wall Connector. The SR charges at a rate of 7.6 kW (about 30 miles per hour), whereas the LR charges at 9.6 kW (about 37 miles per hour). The slightly faster home charging is a nice add-on, but far from justifies the cost. The point of the LR is the additional range, let’s move to that aspect.

Battery Cost

I thought you said we were going to talk about range next; this is cost. Yes, I did. But the question we are asking is about value for money. So, let’s look at the cost value of what you’re getting.

The price of lithium-ion batteries has declined from an average of around $400 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) in 2012 (when the Model S was launched) to under $150 today. For comparison, GM says when buying batteries for the Chevy Bolt, they pay LG Chem about $145 per kWh. This is, of course, just for the battery cells, it does not include the packaging, cooling, installation… The final retail price for any finished goods would be far above the cost of the raw components, but this gives you a starting reference.

Although Tesla has not released specific pack sizes for the two vehicles, there have been leaks that have let us know the that the SR has about 50 kWh of capacity and the LR has 75 to 80 kWh. So let’s assume that the extra $9,000 buys you 30 kWh more capacity. That is a retail price of $300 per kWh. From this perspective, Tesla is not giving us a bargain, but there are other ways to look at this too.

It’s All About The Range

If you just look at the price of the car and the range, you can make a simple table of price per mile. Our table will have the Model 3 LR and SR as well as a few other EVs for comparison. Note, these are base prices (not including incentives). If you want to buy leather seats, or dual motors, that’s up to you, but including it here would complicate the table.

Screen-Shot-2017-10-06-at-9.43.11-AM.png


* The 2018 Leaf data is not final/official at the time of writing, this may need an update when final pricing and EPA results are published.

Looking at the range this way, the LR is the best per mile bargain in the bunch. Only the Model 3 SR and Chevy Bolt are even in the same category for dollars per mile category.

Summary

The car you’ll like best is the one that meets your needs and your budget. Make sure you understand your driving habits. Open Google Maps and plot out your regular drives. For your longer drives, open the Tesla Supercharger map and see if there are any Superchargers along the routes for your longer drives.

Sidebar: Margins & Upgrade Options

Tesla has to make money on each car they sell. These funds go towards building out the production capacity, charging infrastructure, and more. The no frills SR car should be as affordable as possible to allow as many customers into the 200-mile plus EV market as they can. One way to do this is to keep the profit margin on the base model of the car low and then offer compelling upgrades (with higher margins). This allows the company to have a blended margin that is above that of the base model while keeping the door open to more price-sensitive customers. Tesla is far from the only automaker to use this scheme and it is a win for both the company and customers.

TMC Member Patrick0101 is a solar and electric vehicle advocate who blogs at Cards With Cords

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your analysis looks accurate. What is missing is my belief most drivers do not feel comfortable driving on the last 1/8 of their gas tank..
Yes supercharger EV travel is different. From what I have learned from the gurus here, standard (and quickest) operating procedure for SC travel is to arrive at minimal SOC like around 10%-12% (i.e. less than 1/8 tank). No big deal, since if you start running short you can easily increase range enroute.

Note I am just another keyboard pilot. I am renting a Tesla in the near future to try all this out LOL.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Vern Padgett
Your analysis looks accurate. What is missing is my belief most drivers do not feel comfortable driving on the last 1/8 of their gas tank. (Of course I can’t prove that statement, but it seems like a pretty safe assumption.) That’s why LR makes sense to me and many others. I believe resale values for the SR will plunge solely because the competition including Teslas will routinely eliminate range anxiety and a rated range of 220 won’t. So what’s the range anxiety cut off? 300 maybe, 400 for sure as at that point EV range will match many ICE vehicles. Of course hybrids can achieve 500+ but I doubt many people buy hybrids for that reason.

ABetterTripPlanner defaults to an arrival charge of 10%, only slightly less that your 1/8th tank. You can still make it easily from supercharger to supercharger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vern Padgett
Your analysis looks accurate. What is missing is my belief most drivers do not feel comfortable driving on the last 1/8 of their gas tank. (Of course I can’t prove that statement, but it seems like a pretty safe assumption.)
I'd agree. On road trips i get much closer to empty than most drivers are willing, as I know how to access the setup menu on the trip computer and see raw fuel level sensor data.. I don't start getting pucker-factor until the sensor says 4.0L and is not fluctuating with braking and acceleration. Haven't run out yet.. *touches wood*

That’s why LR makes sense to me and many others. I believe resale values for the SR will plunge solely because the competition including Teslas will routinely eliminate range anxiety and a rated range of 220 won’t. So what’s the range anxiety cut off? 300 maybe, 400 for sure as at that point EV range will match many ICE vehicles. Of course hybrids can achieve 500+ but I doubt many people buy hybrids for that reason.

400miles at highway speeds is a lot of battery, in volume, weight and $$$. I think we are 5+ years from a 400mile highway range EV that is anything near affordable. There isn't a lot of aero gains to be made, motors and inverters are also highly efficient so not a lot of gains to be made there, so its small incremental gains unless there is a battery chemistry breakthrough.

I don't think resale on the SR will be that bad, even in 6-10 years there will be plenty of 2+ car households that will be able to use the SR to replace the around town ICE car and still have either an ICE or a long range EV for trips.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vern Padgett
Here is my math. I drive 15K miles per year based on the last 8 years, I might take a couple of long trips a year say a total of 2K per year. The result means I drive an average of about 50 miles a day in local trips. I don't need to spend 9K on long range, even if it is amortized over a 10 year period to drive 50 miles per day on average. Even if I drive 100 miles a day, every other day, SR will still be fine.

I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. If I made a long trip once a month or I lived in a cold climate or if LR was half the price or I didn't have at home PV charging, I would probably come to a different decision. Each has their own criteria and needs and we are fortunate that TESLA gives us options.
 
I'm on the verge of retirement (my friends say I'm already there), and we like taking road trips, sometimes to places where there aren't a lot of Superchargers (yet). I'm using abetterrouteplanner.com to game the differences between the SR and LR on specific routes with varying assumptions, like ending state of charge %, max speed, etc. I'm under the (possibly mistaken) impression that long term battery health requires I shouldn't by choice run the charge below 15%, and that's a good level to avoid my own personal range anxiety. So I use those parameters to compare the two Model 3s, particularly total time of travel and time at each SC stop.

My mode of travel is not rushed, and (TMI!) my bladder won't let me go for hours on end without stopping. So I take that into account. Texas speed limits run as high as 75 MPH (maybe 80 in west Texas) and I'm uncomfortable being the guy holding up a line of cars (or trucks) on the two-lane ranch road or farm to market road doing 65 in a 75 MPH zone. Especially in a car with a 140 MPH max speed. :)

I could use either the 11 year old Prius or 7 year old Kia Soul we have now for road trips, but don't enjoy either one for that purpose. I plan on liking the Tesla! So based on all that, I'm choosing the LR--faster trips, less range anxiety. I can afford it, and the wife said I could have it. When I first found out the LR was $9K extra, I was undecided for most of that day and did a rough calculation of the profit margin (it's gotta be at least 50%). But after that, I've been convinced it's worth it *for me*. YMMV. I'm not getting the PUP (nothing in it is appealing except the 12-way adjustable driver seat), so it's a roughly $50K car. Less federal tax credit. That is a price I can rationalize.
 
So, I haven't had a chance to test drive either the SR or LR. From the reviews, the LR sounds awesome, as the kids used to say. Any idea how the SR may drive? Better? Different? I would love to hear intelligent speculation.
Should drive the same. I am not sure you will notice the weight difference. Certainly some automobile connoisseurs will claim that they can tell, but most probably wouldn't. I would assume that the SR will have different spring and dampening rates due to the nominal weight difference, but again, I don't think most will notice.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Dr. J
I am so sorry that I paid thousands of dollars more for leather seats. It is like sitting in a plastic bag. Buy the fabric seats!
Interesting that you say that. I got the fabric seats in part because I don't like leather — sticky when hot because they don't "breathe" and a colder feel in cold temperatures. I'm really glad I did; I like the fabric seats a lot.

The Model 3 seats are reported to be fake leather, which figures to be more durable than real leather but will likely have the same "plastic bag" feel. One workaround in hot weather is to precool the car before getting in or, for short errands, keep the cooling on while away from the car via camper mode.

I'd rather have the fabric seats, if they are anything like my S seats. However, my impression is that fabric seats will not be available a la carte, but only as part of the standard, non-PUP, configuration (right?). At least for the time being.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vern Padgett