You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope.He didn't touch the wheel for 6 seconds prior to the crash & could see the barrier for 5 of those seconds
Yep, my thoughts exactly. I'm thinking the driver may have told the car, with a double detent on the lane change stalk, to enter the gore (is that what it is called?) area. Tesla will have this data however if that was the case. Other than that I don't see how the car was on autopilot in a non-lane **IF** it was in autopilot for at least a 1/2 mile prior to impact.It doesn't say how long they think the car was in the gore area. Did auto-steer get into that non-lane and stay there the whole time? ..."five seconds and 150 meters of unobstructed view of the concrete divider"... does that imply that it was in the gore area that whole time? I just rewatched one of those dashcam videos of the area and 5 seconds seems about right for the whole gore area at highway speeds.
Also it doesn't say anything about lane change requests.
OMG... Tesla's update is monumentally concerning...
It's pretty well-known that stationary objects may not be detected. That's not a surprise.
So question, it says TACC but not Auto-Steer. So basically just cruise control? And it would or wouldn't keep you in a lane? I would never drive at highway speed with it set min. distance. For those of you who use AP regularly looking forward to hear your comments.
Gosh I wonder what he was doing in those last 6 seconds that he didn't take any action. I'm assuming that there's no way other than eyewitness accounts to know what lane he was driving in. Maybe there was some medical issue going on or maybe as simple as some distraction in the car. Since the CHP said he was driving highway speed, and considering the extent of the crash, it must have been 65mph or more. Maybe we will get that info as well from Tesla. Definitely be looking for the other investigative reports when they come out and hopefully ABC7s indepth look, I hope, at accident reports for that area. I read the words and comprehend them but still hard to understand how he could not have been paying attention at that critical juncture in a road he traveled each day to work. Tough news to digest.
Does it? We use the adaptive Cuise Control but don't turn on Autosteer.
They did not specify the timeline. it's entirely possible the warnings were long ago and autosteer was enabled and disabled in the interim multiple times. The only clear thing we know is at the time of impact autopilot (I assume autosteer) was enabled.You don't get hands on wheel warnings in TACC only. Tesla stated he had been warned prior to the accident.
...what bothers me is how AP got into the gore lane and subsequently hit the diver.
They did not specify the timeline. it's entirely possible the warnings were long ago and autosteer was enabled and disabled in the interim multiple times. The only clear thing we know is at the time of impact autopilot (I assume autosteer) was enabled.
This question may have been asked and answered somewhere in the 50 pages of this thread
Did the Model X involved the fatal crash have AP1 or 2?
...Second AP fatality (in China) described here...
It depends on a lot of things, like how confident AP is, curvature of road, ... could be over a minute, I think.After how many seconds of not having your hands on it will you get a warning?
How do you know that? (Just curious)He bought it last November, so I would guess AP2.