You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed, but a seal should seal and not allow water to pass, at least not significantly. For me, simply replacing with a waterproof connector isn't curing the root cause. Yes it makes sense to do that but the primary issue is sealing that isn't working very well.the thing to bear in mind here, is that this issue doesn't look like it's strictly an issue with the windscreen seal, it's more related to the positioning of a none-water-tight plug that apparently has now been moved slightly and made water-resistant.
If there were larger issues related to the seal, we'd see this issue on the US and other EU LHD cars.
It would be good if there were some images of what has actually changed, as Tesla may not issue a recall and some people may want to protect themselves a little better than pushing at a windscreen seal, as this may only buy time (or at least check if their car has the fix already or is potentially going to fail at some point).
Windscreen cowl is RHD and LHD specific. See parts catalog.but it's not going to only be the RHD cars where this seal isn't fitted well, it'll be all cars. So it's likely that a large number of model 3's have water leaking past this "seal" and it isn't an issue. It's very unlikely to be 100% so it should be designed to allow water to flow down without damaging anything.
Well, I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be a seal and if you have a look in the compartment, it seems pretty clear that water isn't meant to be in there. It may miss components or land on kit that's been waterproofed, but longer term issues, e.g. rust, still remain. There are drain ducts at end of the cowl where water is supposed to go, not pi$$ through the seal. It's clearly an issue and hopefully Tesla will sort it. If they just intend to replace the loom and still let water in, I won't be accepting that unless they provide some sort of insurance against any future issues. New cars shouldn't leakbut it's not going to only be the RHD cars where this seal isn't fitted well, it'll be all cars. So it's likely that a large number of model 3's have water leaking past this "seal" and it isn't an issue. It's very unlikely to be 100% so it should be designed to allow water to flow down without damaging anything.
What does that mean? A recall? A new part? Do you have some insight here?It's an oversight, but it's being dealt with.
The replacement loom piece that they are retrofitting to the early cars is a component they are currently fitting to cars being manufactured (so in theory they have "fixed" the issue).What does that mean? A recall? A new part? Do you have some insight here?
It's all in this thread I think.What does that mean? A recall? A new part? Do you have some insight here?
When my M3P had the problem a couple of weeks ago the safety systems were disabled (Emergency breaking, stability control, etc and I think I even saw something about airbags), so I don't think the s/w fix was in 2020.4.1
Also, the notes detailing the work done for the repair say that they only cleaned up the electrical terminals and repositioned the cables rather than replaced with a new harness. They said the existing terminals were still in good condition so did not require replacement. SO, they are not necessarily replacing UK wiring harness with a new, more watertight one.
Anecdotal at best. Between 424xxx and 463xxx, over 11,000 RHD (source: Model 3 VINs (@Model3VINs) | Twitter). Granted not all destined to the U.K. Like others, running the latest software. This is my invoice. No replacement of harness.Cars have been modified at the factory for some time now. Any cars already here which are affected to the point where errors are thrown and the owner books a service call will get the new harness. Software has been changed so that water ingress doesn't disable safety systems. Everyone else should check the trim is seated properly and probably won't be affected.
I take it from this that they didn't resolve how water is getting in? "Modification to allow water to escape" - doesn't sound ideal to me. I can see where the water is pouring in to mine and hopefully they are planning to fix it rather than "modify". No reply from the SC yet.Anecdotal at best. Between 424xxx and 463xxx, over 11,000 RHD (source: Model 3 VINs (@Model3VINs) | Twitter). Granted not all destined to the U.K. Like others, running the latest software. This is my invoice. No replacement of harness.
Concern: Water ingress water loom 22/01/20
Carried out wiring repair to the wiring harness and connectors and a modification to allow the water to escape. Updated
the firmware and confirmed the vehicle is now as designed.
Correction: General Diagnosis
Correction: Disconnect 12V Power
Correction: Underhood Storage Unit (Remove & Replace)
Correction: Harness Connector - Repair (Does Not Include Access Labor)
Correction: Firmware Update - Repair
Correction: Perform Validation Test Drive
I'm not sure they're actually curing the root cause i.e. the leak. I've politely requested they address the leak on mine and will advise what they say - assuming I ever manage to get through to the SC that is. I'd much prefer that water doesn't flood in, even if it comes out at bottom of the car. If you get chance, try pouring a jug of water down your screen with the frunk inspection panel removed and take a look under the cowl seal or place some kitchen towel thereHere's the description of the rectification to my car ... interestingly there's no mention of the water aspect.
View attachment 515653
Multiple system failureWhere has that VIN range come from?