@AWDtsla Yes I get the fact I received something more than I paid for for a brief period of time. (and of course it isn't the same thing as people not getting what they paid for). What did not happen is Tesla did not contact me to let me know there had been a mistake, a simple phone call is all it would have taken.
Rightly or wrongly I viewed it in the same way as if I bought a new car with an alloy spare wheel instead of a steel one. I'd driven off not noticing, having signed all the paperwork and both parties were happy with the deal (even though there was an error unknown to either at the time). Later the dealer realised their mistake, and rather than talk to me about it they swapped my spare wheel in the middle of the night, to put the deal back to how it should have been.
What I am really trying to highlight is the power Tesla has with OTA, and how it needs to be treated with a bit more sensitivity and transparency.
I will leave aside the fact under UK distant selling rules that if goods or services cannot be delivered as ordered then a substitute of equivalent or better should be given. In my case single charger UK cars were not available at time of delivery, so a dual charger car met that legal requirement for the delivered good. Retrospectively changing it's behaviour without notice is what upset me.
When the car was new nothing could get a jump on it from the lights...
