TSLA chart above
QQQ chart above
TSLA trading during market hours was highlighted by the stock getting within about $1.50 of 300 around 11:30am. This friskiness of TSLA did not sit well with the market makers and hedge funds, and so we saw 63% of TSLA selling tagged to shorts as (apparently) the Wall Street big dogs fought to keep TSLA safely below the very tall 300-strike call wall.
Shortly after close Tesla released the Q2 Earnings Report with a decent beat on non-GAAP earnings per share (0.91 vs. 0.81 expected and 0.85 in Q1). Initially, after-hours showed a big dip down, followed by a big recovery into the green then another big dip and recovery. After the gyrations, TSLA leveled off just below the red/green line as we awaited the conference call. My question is this? Why was TSLA trading so level at a loss after the beat? My guess is that someone was ironing out any upward pushes to maintain the story that the beat was actually a disappointment.
Here's CNBC's take. Why would someone do this? Consider:
* Max pain is 260 and no big put walls until a descent to 270. That Mt. Everest call wall at 300 was getting way too close for comfort
* NASDAQ 100 rebalancing should take place during Friday's closing cross. Those hedge funds buying on Friday's close from the Nasdaq 100 index funds have likely already shorted the stock and will be making a nice profit as they buy to cover on Friday. The lower TSLA closes on Friday, the bigger the hedge fund profits from this front-running
Anyway, here's how both the spin and some actual disappointment of the earnings call evolved. Pierre Farragu suggested a Q2 miss but that Q2 would be the trough for this gross margins dip and so everything would be okay. At least one other analyst picked up on this Q2 is the trough idea and stated that Tesla needed to make it clear that Q2 was the bottom in terms of gross margins. The thing is that TSLA didn't miss in terms of earnings, and so there was no need for them to justify themselves. When Elon was asked for forward guidance regarding any possible future price cuts on vehicles, he gave the honest answer, which was to say it all depends upon the economy. If interest rates climb higher, price cuts might be needed to move vehicles, if the economy is good and rates hold stead or decline, maybe not. He mentioned that what happens in the short run is not of much consequence because with Full Self Driving coming, all vehicles sold in the near future are going to produce tons of profits when FSD is added. That argument briefly worked when Wall Street was enamored with AI, but this was an earnings call and Elon's sentiment received the typical pie-in-the-sky response.
Following the stock price during the conference call, one of the first downward spikes came when the question about transfer of FSD came up and Elon said yes, but in Q3 only. That reply was seen as a suggestion that Q3 had some demand problems and needed help. In reality, the situation is that many Model 3 owners are indeed ready to trade up, but most are waiting for Highland with V4 FSD hardware. Thus we see one of the unique challenges of Q3 will be moving sufficient numbers of Model 3s until the Highland upgrade comes about. Moving FSD from a Model 3 to another vehicle type might provide some demand traction, however. Efforts to modify the production lines (presumably including Highland preparations) will reduce output in Q3 and production will be somewhat below Q2's, which did not sit well with investors (but makes total sense in the long run).
What you'll notice is that the events in the Q2 ER that were seen as negatives happened in the conference call, and some negative adjustments were warranted. Nonetheless, there's the issue of TSLA trading below Tuesday's closing price BEFORE the conference call began, and I think that low trading number was a pretty easy manipulation to pull off with the relatively low volume of after-hours trading and Q2 results being a small beat but not a blowout. The Wall Street pirates reached into their bag of tricks and did what was necessary to turn a beat into a dip. Such is life as a Tesla retail investor.
The good news? Inflation is toast and the economy is still strong. Darth Powell and his band may well raise rates a quarter percent in July just for bluster (even though inflation continues to come down at a rapid rate). Powell will threaten more rate hikes, but as long as inflation continues its descent, another hike after that is not likely. When we start seeing deflationary months the Fed will be forced to start cutting rates, and that's when being an auto manufacturer really gets good again. It's coming. In the meantime, Tesla is also an AI company and we're going to continue seeing rapid improvements in FSD. Tesla is in early talks to license FSD to another auto maker. Tesla energy products margins are in line with vehicles now. There's a 10% energy improvement in 4680 cells. Lots of good stuff still to go.
Percent of selling tagged to shorts came in high at 63%, suggesting lots of manipulations
Yields on 10 yr. treasury bonds closed at 3.76% on Wednesday
Max pain Wednesday morning was way up at 260, reflecting an average upward shift in puts and calls
Wednesday's options volumes
The big question is where does the stock price go this week after a beat that was spun as a disappointment? Max pain is 260, but I suggest we're more likely to see the fade stop short of the 270 put wall and then a recovery can begin.
Conditions:
* Dow up 108 (0.31%)
* NASDAQ up 4 (0.03%)
* SPY up 1 (0.22%)
* TSLA 291.26, down 2.08 (0.71%)
* TSLA volume 291.26, down 2.08M shares
* Oil 75.36
* IV 56.6, 41%
* Max Pain 260
* Percent of TSLA selling tagged to shorts: 63%
* Volume at 4pm closing cross: 2.5M shares