Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Prediction Competition for 2015

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
fc2fca5cc8833d35c92822a6af386914480a4e7c2411a6329d9742eb6bc89110.jpg
 
I think a true estimate does not use february guidance but does so simply from end of year sales. I think for true competition, we need to remove subsidies and close the guesses the day before the Q4 call occurs. Let's make it a true guessing contest and not rely on help from the company. By holding the guess date with the member, we can see if they are just extending guidance or using their own skill level. This is a contest for finding the "true Oracle" and that means their own skills are being used. We can never know if a mid year "card" will be thrown. Nobody knew 70 RWD or Ludicrous was coming during 2015. We also assumed Model X would be here by now. I doubt the value of waiting for Q4 call guidance matters much. Only four of 2015 contest guesses will be under the actual delivery number. That indicates 35 are over and possibly many were guessing with some level of exuberance built from following or extending corporate guidance. Same thing happened in the 2014 contest. 12 2015 guesses were 60,000 and higher. Strange thing is, 55,000 was possible if the company actually pushed harder to get Model X out the door earlier in the year.

Benz, I do still believe I have 2015 "in the bag". Three weeks until we know. I won't mind a repeat win. And also, aren't 1400 2015 sales considered 2014 vacation-affected sales?


Doesn't matter, because they weren't counted in 2014. So your "winning value" only happened in 2014 because of those sales being off set, you can't have it both ways.

By the way, I like your idea, as that was what derived my guess was basing a guess of the final 2014 number and extrapolating the 2015 projections. Although this time around we will have the 2015 number (or at least close enough to likely declare a winner) before the Q4 call, so if you wanted to base a 2016 number you should have enough information minus whatever would have been given out by the Q4 call itself.

Personally I'm feeling an 80k 2016 number, but that might be too generous of a number yet again (I keep over shooting... *grumble grumble*)
 
So I think we can safely say that we have a winner for the 2015 prediction competion, if we don't get a too big final adjustment by Tesla in their upcoming Q4 report in February.
With the current deliveries, as reported by Tesla today, the total stands at 50,580.

Our winner is 'Lump' that predicted 51,888 almost a year a go. He is off by only 1,308 deliveries.
Our second runner up is 'maoing' with a prediction of 52,800 deliveries, off by 2,200 deliveries.
Third place goes to last years winner, 'bonaire' with a prediction of 47,690, off by 2,890 deliveries.

Congratulations Lump! I think we might have a TMC cap as the first price :smile:

As for the 2016 full year prediction competition, I'll open up a thread tomorrow. The rules we played by the past two years have been that the voting closes one week after the February quarterly report so as to give everyone a fair chance to take TM's guidance into consideration, so we've got plenty of time. Thanks for participating everyone and hopefully we'll get more participants in the next competition.
 
So I think we can safely say that we have a winner for the 2015 prediction competion, if we don't get a too big final adjustment by Tesla in their upcoming Q4 report in February.
With the current deliveries, as reported by Tesla today, the total stands at 50,580.

Our winner is 'Lump' that predicted 51,888 almost a year a go. He is off by only 1,308 deliveries.
Our second runner up is 'maoing' with a prediction of 52,800 deliveries, off by 2,200 deliveries.
Third place goes to last years winner, 'bonaire' with a prediction of 47,690, off by 2,890 deliveries.

Congratulations Lump! I think we might have a TMC cap as the first price :smile:

As for the 2016 full year prediction competition, I'll open up a thread tomorrow. The rules we played by the past two years have been that the voting closes one week after the February quarterly report so as to give everyone a fair chance to take TM's guidance into consideration, so we've got plenty of time. Thanks for participating everyone and hopefully we'll get more participants in the next competition.

Congrats Lump and maoing.

I think Denmark was the wildcard this year which I didn't factor in early in 2015. Going to have to factor any outgoing incentives in for 2016. Do you think we should limit the guess to "without going over"? Only four guesses for 2015 did not overshoot the actual number. Only two guesses were under the number for 2014. Which is also an indication of why the stock price is so high - high expectations.
 
I think Denmark was the wildcard this year which I didn't factor in early in 2015. Going to have to factor any outgoing incentives in for 2016. Do you think we should limit the guess to "without going over"?

Again, Demand is not an issue.

~1500 units less to Denmark would simply mean 1500 more units somewhere else.

How about limiting guesses "without going under?"

There are high expectations because Tesla has high y-o-y sales growth.

And the SP is not high.
 
Congrats to bonaire too! I believe it's not coincident for Lump and I among the top 2, who were both accused as "FUDster", "shorts" and "sky falling guy" in 2015 for multiple occurances. I really hope everyone thrive in 2016 and going forward, but rule #1 is to set proper expectation with balanced views.

Congrats Lump and maoing.

I think Denmark was the wildcard this year which I didn't factor in early in 2015. Going to have to factor any outgoing incentives in for 2016. Do you think we should limit the guess to "without going over"? Only four guesses for 2015 did not overshoot the actual number. Only two guesses were under the number for 2014. Which is also an indication of why the stock price is so high - high expectations.
 
I'm not sure why there are so many people want to convince themselves and novices that demand is not an issue for Tesla. Demand certainly is growing but that's not Tesla investors can be satisfied. We need demand growth exceeding expectation, guidance without sacrificing margin. Otherwise, we should not debate if 50580 met on reduced low end of guidance instead of how much Tesla can beat 55K even w/o model X. Here is my earlier reply to papafox wrt. demand constraint reasonings http://www.teslamotorsclub.com/show...vements-2015?p=1239789&viewfull=1#post1239789. I'll stop replying here. People always like to choose what they want to believe and I have no obiligation to convince them.

For 2016, the 17K model S quarterly demand like Q4 is not sustainable. But model X backlog will mitigate the demand issues. So for the Q1/Q2/Q3, TSLA SP is mainly driven by model X production rate.

IMO you are losing the forest for the trees. 50 Pc unit growth in deliveries for 2015 and 2016 ( guidance ), given the high price points, in my view is pretty darn good !

Anyone, who thinks otherwise is completely missing the point. That's like saying someone selling 5 million units of $1000 item , and growing at 50 pc per year , has a problem with demand growth.

I expect that with the Model 3 we will see 3 to 5 times the demand of the Model S. Price elasticity of demand.

Importantly , the above does NOT factor in revenues from Tesla energy , something the same management team is working on .....
 
IMO you are losing the forest for the trees. 50 Pc unit growth in deliveries for 2015 and 2016 ( guidance ), given the high price points, in my view is pretty darn good !

Anyone, who thinks otherwise is completely missing the point. That's like saying someone selling 5 million units of $1000 item , and growing at 50 pc per year , has a problem with demand growth.

I expect that with the Model 3 we will see 3 to 5 times the demand of the Model S. Price elasticity of demand.

Importantly , the above does NOT factor in revenues from Tesla energy , something the same management team is working on .....

Model 3 is a half-price solution. Currently, you can buy CPO Model S RWD for half their original price. And some now into the $40xxx range USD. Since this car is supposed to be better than a Model 3, why are there CPO on the lots still? Is it because people demand the new-car smell? Or they require no scratches or other dirt issues? I feel EVs of 5 miles, 50,000 miles and even 150,000 miles all will run roughly the same performance. The problem is how long does an owner feel a battery will last and also any out of warranty cost concerns with many of the CPOs with RWD Drive Units.

Until the CPO demand shows mass adoption of Model S at a faster pace (and more will be on the lots come later in 2016 due to lease turn-ins) - I don't want to estimate any future demand guesses for Model 3. I actually think the Chevy Bolt won't do that well and it is in the same driving range as Model 3 and could benefit from a growing DCFC fleet of CHAdeMO or SAE combo chargers should they be deployed. To get consumers fully on board, they need to see far more SuperCharger stations or at least far more HPWC at malls, hotels (chains like Marriott and Hyatt), and motorways. I extimate 3-4 times as many SuperChargers should be distributed and more of the 2-head and 4-head and not 8-head solutions. You need them scattered like at convenience stores rather than large ones on major highways. Plus they must display "load status" using car telemetry to indicate how many Teslas are "nearby" the charging point. Data is there - time to use it to help people know if they will have a wait prior to showing up.

Model 3 will be "hot" but also must fit into the budgets of those who are not already in the EV "world". Model S has sold as many as 2,3 or more to single-owners as they went from model to model since 2012. Their repeat buying may repeat with Model 3 but the 3 will definitely be one that requires new un-assimilated buyers to be lining up and getting very good lease finance rates. It's a wildcard, really.

Benz - wasn't it said that Tesla would deliver at 50% annual growth rates "for years to come"? I do think getting past 50% growth for 2016 on cars alone will be tough to do. Denmark had its end of year blitz. Norway is tapped out somewhat waiting on Model X. And the Model X is currently unknown for current reservations holders (based no whether some removed their reservation or switched to Model S). Another wild card.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to ask all to make use the 2016 thread for the next go-around; the next move will be to port over the appropriate posts from here to there; afterwards this thread will be shuttered.

Thank you all for participating and good luck!

And, on edit - five posts appropriate for the new thread have been transferred and this thread is now closed.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.